﻿WEBVTT

00:00:00.018 --> 00:00:02.013
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Hello and welcome.

00:00:02.013 --> 00:00:05.002
Good evening and welcome
to our March Council meeting.

00:00:05.002 --> 00:00:08.017
I&apos;m Mayor Liz Pattison and it&apos;s a pleasure
to welcome members of the community

00:00:08.017 --> 00:00:10.005
into the chambers tonight.

00:00:10.005 --> 00:00:13.020
This meeting is also being live streamed,
so a big welcome to those tuning

00:00:13.020 --> 00:00:17.009
in online, and of course welcome
to my fellow Councillors,

00:00:17.009 --> 00:00:21.003
noting that we are likely
to have Councillor Wellington online

00:00:21.003 --> 00:00:23.002
tonight.

00:00:23.002 --> 00:00:25.014
Live captioning
will accompany the live stream

00:00:25.014 --> 00:00:28.004
and the Council Chambers is fitted
with a hearing loop,

00:00:28.004 --> 00:00:30.016
which transmits directly to hearing aids.

00:00:30.016 --> 00:00:34.003
We hope that this assists those
who may be having hearing difficulties.

00:00:34.003 --> 00:00:37.012
The Surf Coast Shire local government area
spans the traditional lands

00:00:37.012 --> 00:00:42.003
of the Wadawurrung people and the Gulidjan
and Gadubanud peoples of the Maar Nation.

00:00:42.003 --> 00:00:46.001
I would like to acknowledge that here
in Torquay at the main Council office,

00:00:46.001 --> 00:00:48.005
we are gathered on Wadawurrung country.

00:00:48.005 --> 00:00:52.003
I pay my respects to Elders past,
present and emerging.

00:00:52.003 --> 00:00:55.019
The Wadawurrung people have nurtured
and protected these lands and waterways

00:00:55.019 --> 00:00:59.010
for thousands of generations
and I am so grateful for the opportunity

00:00:59.010 --> 00:01:03.008
to live and work in such a beautiful part
of the world.

00:01:03.008 --> 00:01:05.017
We also wish
to acknowledge the traditional owners

00:01:05.017 --> 00:01:08.001
of the lands on which each person
is attending

00:01:08.001 --> 00:01:12.014
and acknowledge any Aboriginal people
who may be viewing the meeting tonight.

00:01:12.014 --> 00:01:19.020
Last week I was part
of the G21 Region Alliance of five Mayors

00:01:19.020 --> 00:01:22.011
and Council CEOs to visit Canberra
for meetings

00:01:22.011 --> 00:01:25.006
with federal government ministers
and shadow ministers

00:01:25.006 --> 00:01:28.012
to highlight major pressures
on the G21 region stemming

00:01:28.012 --> 00:01:31.007
from rapid population growth,
and that was focusing

00:01:31.007 --> 00:01:37.009
on things such as transport, housing
and key worker visa extensions.

00:01:37.009 --> 00:01:40.012
So we took part in around 18 meetings,
which included Deputy

00:01:40.012 --> 00:01:43.024
Prime Minister Richard Marles,
Infrastructure Minister Catherine King,

00:01:43.024 --> 00:01:46.024
and Regional Development
and Local Government Minister Kristy

00:01:46.024 --> 00:01:52.008
McBain, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton,
and local MPs Libby Coker and Dan Tehan.

00:01:52.008 --> 00:01:57.001
It was a really great opportunity to meet
with our ministers and engage with them

00:01:57.001 --> 00:01:59.011
on things that are really important
for our region.

00:02:01.014 --> 00:02:06.019
And as I already mentioned, we advocated
for improved transport, affordable housing

00:02:06.019 --> 00:02:11.003
and action
to address our key worker shortage.

00:02:11.003 --> 00:02:15.018
So through G21,
we are seeking a permanent policy change

00:02:15.018 --> 00:02:20.024
to the Working Holiday Maker visa,
so visa holders can stay with one employer

00:02:20.024 --> 00:02:24.021
for up to 12 months rather than just six
months.

00:02:24.021 --> 00:02:29.000
This will give our businesses more
stability in staffing and attract workers

00:02:29.000 --> 00:02:32.017
to the region with the promise
of ongoing employment.

00:02:32.017 --> 00:02:35.016
Last month Council celebrated
International Women&apos;s Day

00:02:35.016 --> 00:02:40.003
with the unveiling
of a mural the Strong Woman Strong Spirit

00:02:40.003 --> 00:02:44.008
by First Nations artist Jenna Oldaker.

00:02:44.008 --> 00:02:47.019
So if you haven&apos;t already seen it
at Wurdi Baierr, when you first walk in,

00:02:47.019 --> 00:02:51.000
it&apos;s a beautiful mural, very bright
and colourful

00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:53.003
with some really important messages.

00:02:53.003 --> 00:02:56.023
The artist describes the work as
&quot;a celebration of all the strong women

00:02:56.023 --> 00:03:00.014
that have travelled this beautiful land
that we are lucky enough to call home.

00:03:00.014 --> 00:03:04.019
Our ancestors and Elders travelled these
same lands sharing their culture,

00:03:04.019 --> 00:03:09.013
sharing their stories and ideas, and it
is now our responsibility to take care of

00:03:09.013 --> 00:03:11.013
and nurture our Wadawurrung country home.

00:03:11.013 --> 00:03:14.022
&quot;So those were the artist&apos;s words
in relation to the work.

00:03:14.022 --> 00:03:18.001
We chose to work with an artist
to realise this year&apos;s International

00:03:18.001 --> 00:03:20.013
Women&apos;s Day theme of &quot;Embrace Equity&quot;.

00:03:20.013 --> 00:03:23.016
In Australia, more than half
of undergraduate and three-quarters

00:03:23.016 --> 00:03:26.005
of post-graduate
fine art qualifications are awarded

00:03:26.005 --> 00:03:30.012
to women, yet women&apos;s art makes
up only one quarter of the work acquired

00:03:30.012 --> 00:03:32.018
for public gallery
and municipal collections,

00:03:32.018 --> 00:03:34.008
including public art.

00:03:34.008 --> 00:03:38.005
This shows us that while it&apos;s clear
that women have achieved equity of access

00:03:38.005 --> 00:03:41.000
to education and training in the arts,
there is still nothing

00:03:41.000 --> 00:03:46.000
like equity when it comes
to career opportunities, and in a place

00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:48.010
like the Surf Coast,
where the creative industries

00:03:48.010 --> 00:03:51.017
is a significant contributor
to our economy, this is something we need

00:03:51.017 --> 00:03:53.023
to work actively to understand
and address.

00:03:53.023 --> 00:03:56.016
And now to our agenda for tonight.

00:03:56.016 --> 00:03:59.003
It&apos;s a long one and there&apos;s lots
of important matters,

00:03:59.003 --> 00:04:01.008
so let&apos;s get that under way.

00:04:01.008 --> 00:04:05.014
So our Council meetings operate
according to our Governance Rules,

00:04:05.014 --> 00:04:07.012
which include the following procedures.

00:04:07.012 --> 00:04:10.020
During the meeting, the mover
of a motion or an amendment may speak

00:04:10.020 --> 00:04:13.024
for a maximum of five minutes
to open the debate

00:04:13.024 --> 00:04:16.018
and then a further 2 minutes
to make a closing statement.

00:04:16.018 --> 00:04:19.014
Any other Councillor,
including the seconder, may speak

00:04:19.014 --> 00:04:23.008
to a motion for no more than 3 minutes.

00:04:23.008 --> 00:04:26.022
We have a pledge at our Council,
and I would now like to recite that pledge

00:04:26.022 --> 00:04:30.023
as a sign of our commitment:
as Councillors, we carry

00:04:30.023 --> 00:04:35.024
out our responsibilities with diligence
and integrity and make fair decisions

00:04:35.024 --> 00:04:40.006
of lasting value for the wellbeing
of our community and environment.

00:04:46.023 --> 00:04:51.001
And moving along on apologies,
are there any apologies tonight

00:04:51.001 --> 00:04:54.015
for this Council meeting?

00:04:54.015 --> 00:04:57.017
No?

00:04:57.017 --> 00:04:59.004
And the confirmation of minutes

00:04:59.004 --> 00:05:02.002
- can I please have a mover and a seconder
to confirm the minutes

00:05:02.002 --> 00:05:05.018
of the Council meeting held on Tuesday,
28 February 2023

00:05:05.018 --> 00:05:09.006
and the special Council meetings
for hearings of submissions held

00:05:09.006 --> 00:05:13.021
on 7 March 2023 and 14 March 2023?

00:05:13.021 --> 00:05:15.009
Thank you, Councillor Allen.

00:05:15.009 --> 00:05:17.002
Is it as per the recommendation?

00:05:17.002 --> 00:05:19.001
And seconded by Councillor Hodge.

00:05:19.001 --> 00:05:21.001
All those in favour?

00:05:21.001 --> 00:05:22.021
And the motion is carried unanimously.

00:05:27.004 --> 00:05:30.018
Are there any leave of absence requests?

00:05:30.018 --> 00:05:34.002
No?

00:05:34.002 --> 00:05:37.000
We now move on to declarations
of conflicts of interest.

00:05:37.000 --> 00:05:40.012
If a Councillor or an officer has
a conflict of interest,

00:05:40.012 --> 00:05:43.000
they must declare it now
and do so again just prior

00:05:43.000 --> 00:05:45.000
to the item being discussed.

00:05:45.000 --> 00:05:48.019
The Councillor and/or officer
will be requested to leave the Chambers,

00:05:48.019 --> 00:05:52.011
or for those online to be placed
by the host in a virtual waiting room,

00:05:52.011 --> 00:05:54.010
whilst the matter is being considered.

00:05:54.010 --> 00:05:57.007
Once the matter is resolved,
the Councillor and/or officer

00:05:57.007 --> 00:05:59.002
will be returned to the meeting.

00:05:59.002 --> 00:06:02.002
Are there any declarations of conflicts
of interest in relation

00:06:02.002 --> 00:06:04.019
to tonight&apos;s agenda?

00:06:04.019 --> 00:06:06.010
I have, actually.

00:06:06.010 --> 00:06:11.006
I&apos;d like to note that I am declaring
an interest in item 4.9, as point 2

00:06:11.006 --> 00:06:14.014
of the recommendation requests
that Council note a matter related

00:06:14.014 --> 00:06:19.018
to the Jan Juc Kindergarten bike path
proposal and as my brother-in-law

00:06:19.018 --> 00:06:23.014
is the President
of the Parents&apos; Association.

00:06:23.014 --> 00:06:26.015
So I will not be declaring a conflict
of interest

00:06:26.015 --> 00:06:29.008
because tonight we&apos;re just noting this
report.

00:06:29.008 --> 00:06:33.006
However, in future, when it&apos;s presented
for a decision,

00:06:33.006 --> 00:06:35.004
I&apos;ll be declaring a conflict of interest.

00:06:37.006 --> 00:06:41.004
If any other officers or Councillors
become aware of a conflict of interest,

00:06:41.004 --> 00:06:42.016
let me know.

00:06:45.006 --> 00:06:48.004
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Councillor Wellington
is in the waiting room.

00:06:48.004 --> 00:06:51.006
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Oh, Jake,
can we let Councillor Wellington in,

00:06:51.006 --> 00:06:52.019
please?

00:06:52.019 --> 00:06:54.006
Thank you.

00:06:54.006 --> 00:06:56.023
- are there any presentations
from Councillors tonight?

00:06:56.023 --> 00:06:58.024
CR PAUL BARKER: A brief one, thanks,
Mayor.

00:06:58.024 --> 00:07:00.011
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Sure thing.

00:07:00.011 --> 00:07:03.000
CR PAUL BARKER: On Saturday,
I attended the fundraiser

00:07:03.000 --> 00:07:04.013
for Feed Me Surf Coast.

00:07:04.013 --> 00:07:06.016
I learnt a hell of a lot
about the organisation

00:07:06.016 --> 00:07:09.006
and the changing demographic
that they&apos;re supporting.

00:07:09.006 --> 00:07:12.004
Historically, they&apos;ve only supported,
or needed to support,

00:07:12.004 --> 00:07:15.021
those who were unemployed,
for obvious reasons, but due

00:07:15.021 --> 00:07:18.019
to the cost of living,
they&apos;ve found that they&apos;re now needing

00:07:18.019 --> 00:07:23.020
to support people with jobs,
but are still unable to afford to put food

00:07:23.020 --> 00:07:25.008
on the table.

00:07:25.008 --> 00:07:29.000
I&apos;ll be making mention
of that more in the rest of the night,

00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:35.006
but that&apos;s a significant shift in only
about four years of operation

00:07:35.006 --> 00:07:38.002
to now be needing to support those
with work.

00:07:41.019 --> 00:07:44.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you,
Councillor Barker.

00:07:47.012 --> 00:07:49.000
We now move on

00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:51.020
- CR PAUL BARKER: Oh,
and I do note that Councillor Wellington

00:07:51.020 --> 00:07:54.016
was also there,
as was some other local representatives.

00:07:54.016 --> 00:07:57.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Great, thank you.

00:07:57.016 --> 00:08:01.015
- in accordance with Part 2, clause 1
of our Governance Rules,

00:08:01.015 --> 00:08:05.007
a person whose rights
will be directly affected by a decision

00:08:05.007 --> 00:08:08.021
of the Council is entitled
to make a written submission to Council

00:08:08.021 --> 00:08:12.000
to speak to their submission and
to have their interests considered

00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:13.017
in Council decision making.

00:08:13.017 --> 00:08:16.005
A request has been made by Tim
and Caroline Wood

00:08:16.005 --> 00:08:19.024
to make an oral submission in support
of their written submission provided

00:08:19.024 --> 00:08:24.004
to Council in relation to item 4.1
on tonight&apos;s agenda.

00:08:24.004 --> 00:08:27.011
I will now invite Tim and Caroline Wood
to speak.

00:08:27.011 --> 00:08:31.014
We do have a full agenda tonight,
so I will allow up to 5 minutes for each

00:08:31.014 --> 00:08:33.018
of you to have your submission.

00:08:41.002 --> 00:08:42.015
Thank you.

00:08:42.015 --> 00:08:46.003
Can I just ask you bring the microphone
close so that we make sure everyone can

00:08:46.003 --> 00:08:47.016
hear.

00:08:47.016 --> 00:08:49.020
Thanks so much for coming and speaking
with us.

00:08:49.020 --> 00:08:51.014
CAROLINE WOOD: Hi, I&apos;m Caroline Wood.

00:08:51.014 --> 00:08:53.021
I have met quite a few of you,
but you&apos;re obviously

00:08:53.021 --> 00:08:55.018
- there&apos;s a few new faces, a few old faces.

00:08:55.018 --> 00:08:59.017
I&apos;m thinking you&apos;re all up to scratch
with what&apos;s going on here with us.

00:08:59.017 --> 00:09:03.003
Yes, I was an ex Businesswoman
of the Year.

00:09:03.003 --> 00:09:07.004
I&apos;ve been around living in Aireys Inlet
for 30 years and running a small business,

00:09:07.004 --> 00:09:10.003
which has now closed.

00:09:10.003 --> 00:09:13.009
Look, I think, you know,
after hearing your welcome thing

00:09:13.009 --> 00:09:18.021
and what you stand for
and just saying that you mean wellbeing

00:09:18.021 --> 00:09:22.013
and looking after people, you know,
my biggest issue

00:09:22.013 --> 00:09:26.012
with this whole application
and I think what it&apos;s come down to is,

00:09:26.012 --> 00:09:29.008
for me anyway, safety.

00:09:29.008 --> 00:09:31.008
You know, I&apos;m still working with horses.

00:09:31.008 --> 00:09:33.017
I still am very passionate about it.

00:09:33.017 --> 00:09:36.015
I took a girlfriend the other day
and said, &quot;Look, give me a hand.

00:09:36.015 --> 00:09:39.010
I&apos;ve got to take a couple of horses
around that bitumen road,

00:09:39.010 --> 00:09:41.013
it&apos;s really unsafe,
but can you give me a hand?

00:09:41.013 --> 00:09:43.000
I really need it.

00:09:43.000 --> 00:09:45.015
&quot;Now, the two horses,
they&apos;re not really handled a lot,

00:09:45.015 --> 00:09:48.013
and I thought god, Caroline,
that&apos;s ridiculous, I can&apos;t ask her

00:09:48.013 --> 00:09:51.015
to do that again, and
nor can I ask anyone else to do that

00:09:51.015 --> 00:09:53.002
for me.

00:09:53.002 --> 00:09:54.015
It&apos;s just not safe.

00:09:54.015 --> 00:09:57.008
So for me the biggest issue is that not

00:09:57.008 --> 00:10:03.013
- to get to this point after four years
and just say we need the whole process

00:10:03.013 --> 00:10:07.009
to stop now because it&apos;s
for not the benefit

00:10:07.009 --> 00:10:11.011
of the greater community just makes me
feel like I don&apos;t matter.

00:10:13.014 --> 00:10:15.001
Am I the sacrificial lamb?

00:10:15.001 --> 00:10:17.000
Do I have to wear that?

00:10:17.000 --> 00:10:20.008
And I am a community member
and I&apos;m a very passionate person

00:10:20.008 --> 00:10:28.008
in the town and I have put a lot of years
into supporting tourism, kids, employees,

00:10:28.008 --> 00:10:29.020
you know.

00:10:29.020 --> 00:10:31.008
My three kids have grown up there.

00:10:31.008 --> 00:10:36.022
So, yes, it has affected me but, you know,
it certainly hasn&apos;t stopped me

00:10:36.022 --> 00:10:40.016
from planning a future there
and using that land

00:10:40.016 --> 00:10:44.003
and still working with horses,
but I&apos;m still going to be doing the

00:10:44.003 --> 00:10:48.023
same thing, moving horses from one place
to the other, and for you guys

00:10:48.023 --> 00:10:53.001
to sit there on a bench and say, &quot;Well,
sorry, we actually don&apos;t really care&quot;,

00:10:53.001 --> 00:10:57.022
it does matter to me, and that&apos;s
all I want to say.

00:10:57.022 --> 00:11:00.009
So I think I&apos;d really like you
to consider that

00:11:00.009 --> 00:11:03.011
and even though I haven&apos;t got a business,
it doesn&apos;t mean I&apos;m going

00:11:03.011 --> 00:11:05.015
to not have a business in the next 10
or 20 years.

00:11:05.015 --> 00:11:07.014
I&apos;m still going to be the one wearing
that.

00:11:07.014 --> 00:11:09.010
Thank you.

00:11:09.010 --> 00:11:11.008
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you, Caroline.

00:11:14.007 --> 00:11:15.020
TIM WOOD: Righto, I might

00:11:15.020 --> 00:11:17.011
- again, I&apos;m assuming

00:11:17.011 --> 00:11:19.011
- sorry, my name is Tim Wood.

00:11:19.011 --> 00:11:23.003
I&apos;m assuming you guys
all have a pretty good understanding

00:11:23.003 --> 00:11:24.016
of what we&apos;re talking about here.

00:11:24.016 --> 00:11:27.017
So there is a farm in
between Aireys Inlet and Fairhaven.

00:11:27.017 --> 00:11:32.000
I understand that it would be naive
to think that this doesn&apos;t involve

00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:36.018
a fair level of emotion
from the community,

00:11:36.018 --> 00:11:41.021
but this process has gone on
for a ridiculous amount of time,

00:11:41.021 --> 00:11:43.009
to be perfectly honest with you.

00:11:46.020 --> 00:11:48.016
Anyway, this is where we find ourselves.

00:11:48.016 --> 00:11:53.010
So the Council report identified Blazing
Saddles as the main reason

00:11:53.010 --> 00:11:59.009
for the bridge application,
which I think probably lacks scope or

00:11:59.009 --> 00:12:00.022
vision.

00:12:00.022 --> 00:12:02.009
This is a farm.

00:12:02.009 --> 00:12:04.002
It&apos;s always been a farm.

00:12:04.002 --> 00:12:06.006
The Council

00:12:06.006 --> 00:12:12.004
- VCAT obviously issued a planning
permit and I read &quot;for buildings and works

00:12:12.004 --> 00:12:15.003
for the construction of a bridge
and its use as a road

00:12:15.003 --> 00:12:17.022
for the management of livestock&quot;.

00:12:17.022 --> 00:12:19.009
That hasn&apos;t changed at all.

00:12:19.009 --> 00:12:21.019
I&apos;m just going to go through a couple
of things here.

00:12:21.019 --> 00:12:24.010
So the question seems to be, in speaking
to Jake

00:12:24.010 --> 00:12:25.022
- we have a permit for a bridge.

00:12:25.022 --> 00:12:28.013
The question now is public benefit.

00:12:28.013 --> 00:12:31.004
So I did send you guys a brief letter.

00:12:31.004 --> 00:12:33.003
I&apos;m just going to expand
on it a little bit.

00:12:33.003 --> 00:12:38.006
So there is no allowable shedding
on the Bambra Road side of this farm.

00:12:38.006 --> 00:12:40.011
The section 173 prevents it.

00:12:40.011 --> 00:12:44.021
We can&apos;t put a farm shed for tractors,
for hay, for anything that requires you

00:12:44.021 --> 00:12:46.008
to run a farm.

00:12:46.008 --> 00:12:49.018
So it all has to come
from our Bimbadeen Drive side.

00:12:49.018 --> 00:12:51.005
Now, I&apos;m assuming

00:12:51.005 --> 00:12:54.002
- does everyone know what a hay fork is?

00:12:54.002 --> 00:13:00.018
In order to feed out, there&apos;s steel tines
about four to five foot long go

00:13:00.018 --> 00:13:03.017
through a hay bail, you drive
along the road with the hay bail,

00:13:03.017 --> 00:13:07.001
you drop the hay off and you drive back
along the road with these hay spikes

00:13:07.001 --> 00:13:10.001
out the front of your car.

00:13:10.001 --> 00:13:15.009
It&apos;s a ridiculous proposition that that&apos;s
a better way to do it than coming

00:13:15.009 --> 00:13:17.020
across a farm bridge.

00:13:17.020 --> 00:13:19.007
That&apos;s just one example.

00:13:19.007 --> 00:13:21.017
There&apos;s obviously chemicals,
there&apos;s ploughs.

00:13:21.017 --> 00:13:24.009
Whatever we want to do
to run that farm requires the use

00:13:24.009 --> 00:13:25.023
of machinery.

00:13:25.023 --> 00:13:31.003
A farm bridge enables us to go
between paddocks instead of

00:13:31.003 --> 00:13:32.021
around three roads.

00:13:32.021 --> 00:13:36.015
Bambra Road is the second biggest road
in Aireys Inlet.

00:13:36.015 --> 00:13:40.010
It has a school bus at the end of it,
it has trucks for Barwon Water going

00:13:40.010 --> 00:13:45.001
down it, it has all the tradies coming
from Birrego and Bambra.

00:13:45.001 --> 00:13:48.006
It has people walking up and down
in prams, bike riders.

00:13:48.006 --> 00:13:49.023
It&apos;s a busy road.

00:13:49.023 --> 00:13:54.021
It&apos;s a ludicrous proposition
to put farm machinery on it.

00:13:54.021 --> 00:13:57.018
As Caroline said, the second thing
is livestock.

00:13:57.018 --> 00:13:59.023
Caroline breed and trains horses.

00:13:59.023 --> 00:14:01.011
She&apos;s always done this.

00:14:01.011 --> 00:14:04.012
Despite taking people trail riding,
one of the things she does,

00:14:04.012 --> 00:14:06.008
she breeds them and trains them.

00:14:06.008 --> 00:14:11.013
If you get a young foal who&apos;s untrained
and you need to get it around to our side

00:14:11.013 --> 00:14:15.022
of the farm, walking it on a public road
is a ridiculous proposition.

00:14:15.022 --> 00:14:21.018
If we have a cow with a sore eye that
we need to paddock, stable, feed, put vets

00:14:21.018 --> 00:14:26.007
on, walking a cow along a road
is ridiculous.

00:14:26.007 --> 00:14:30.015
It&apos;s unnecessary, it&apos;s dangerous,
it&apos;s daft.

00:14:30.015 --> 00:14:36.020
Now, just to further sort
of prove this point,

00:14:36.020 --> 00:14:41.023
the State Government has a fund
for the Victorian Farmers

00:14:41.023 --> 00:14:48.014
Federation which allocates $50,000
funds to farmers to put underpasses in,

00:14:48.014 --> 00:14:50.002
bridges in, to get

00:14:50.002 --> 00:14:55.015
- now, I should read this, right,
&quot;To get improved safety

00:14:55.015 --> 00:14:59.010
for Victorian farmers and all road users&quot;.

00:14:59.010 --> 00:15:06.015
There is literally a state fund
to get machinery and stock off roads.

00:15:06.015 --> 00:15:09.010
So I understand that the government

00:15:09.010 --> 00:15:11.024
- this has gone for, what, four years.

00:15:11.024 --> 00:15:17.007
I understand why the governance department
, and I gave Jake a hard time the

00:15:17.007 --> 00:15:22.015
other day, which I apologise for,
but I understand why it would be

00:15:22.015 --> 00:15:24.022
a hard thing to come in too late.

00:15:24.022 --> 00:15:29.014
Caroline&apos;s business has closed, &quot;Oh, well,
Blazing Saddles is not there,

00:15:29.014 --> 00:15:31.002
it&apos;s probably not important&quot;,

00:15:31.002 --> 00:15:33.000
blah, blah, blah, and I understand that.

00:15:33.000 --> 00:15:35.018
But this is clearly not the case.

00:15:35.018 --> 00:15:39.011
There is a very obvious public benefit
of a bridge being there.

00:15:39.011 --> 00:15:40.023
It&apos;s obviously a benefit for us.

00:15:40.023 --> 00:15:44.000
It makes it a lot easier for Caroline
and safer for Caroline, but it

00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:45.018
is bigger than that.

00:15:45.018 --> 00:15:48.006
It is a super obvious public benefit.

00:15:48.006 --> 00:15:51.015
I also saw in your report they&apos;re worried
about the risk of someone coming

00:15:51.015 --> 00:15:54.013
into a horse where the bridge is.

00:15:54.013 --> 00:15:56.023
There is virtually no access
to where the bridge is.

00:15:56.023 --> 00:15:58.021
You can&apos;t see it, you can&apos;t do it.

00:15:58.021 --> 00:16:03.015
The risk of that compared to the risk
to the public on the roads

00:16:03.015 --> 00:16:05.011
is absolutely minuscule.

00:16:05.011 --> 00:16:10.023
Knowing this risk and allowing it
to me makes no sense for you guys.

00:16:10.023 --> 00:16:14.008
Why would the shire want
to put themselves in the position where

00:16:14.008 --> 00:16:17.002
they have a knowable risk and
they allow it to happen

00:16:17.002 --> 00:16:19.023
- to Caroline, to her staff, to the public?

00:16:19.023 --> 00:16:22.002
It makes no sense.

00:16:22.002 --> 00:16:28.010
As I said, I understand that this has been
a political exercise, but this

00:16:28.010 --> 00:16:29.023
is a no-brainer, guys.

00:16:29.023 --> 00:16:31.011
It&apos;s a bridge that nobody can see.

00:16:31.011 --> 00:16:33.021
All the environmental assessments have
been done.

00:16:33.021 --> 00:16:36.006
It helps a farm run smoothly.

00:16:36.006 --> 00:16:37.018
It always was to be a farm.

00:16:37.018 --> 00:16:40.019
Everyone wants the farm to be a farm.

00:16:40.019 --> 00:16:42.009
That&apos;s what people in Aireys love.

00:16:42.009 --> 00:16:45.001
They want it to be managed, looked after,
maintained.

00:16:45.001 --> 00:16:47.016
This bridge helps us to do that.

00:16:47.016 --> 00:16:49.011
Anyway, I rest my case.

00:16:49.011 --> 00:16:51.016
I hope sanity prevails.

00:16:51.016 --> 00:16:53.003
Thank you for listening.

00:16:53.003 --> 00:16:56.012
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thanks,
Tim and Caroline, for coming and speaking.

00:16:56.012 --> 00:16:59.024
We have put a lot of time and thought
and obviously because the matter is

00:16:59.024 --> 00:17:03.011
before us, I can&apos;t really talk about it,
but I just wanted to let you know that

00:17:03.011 --> 00:17:06.018
we don&apos;t make these decisions lightly
and we have had many discussions

00:17:06.018 --> 00:17:10.020
and considered this in depth, so thank you
for coming and speaking with us.

00:17:10.020 --> 00:17:12.008
TIM WOOD: Cheers.

00:17:12.008 --> 00:17:14.012
CR PAUL BARKER: Can I just ask a
quick question?

00:17:14.012 --> 00:17:16.000
TIM WOOD: Yes.

00:17:16.000 --> 00:17:19.020
CR PAUL BARKER: When was Blazing Saddles
closed and for what reason?

00:17:19.020 --> 00:17:22.006
CAROLINE WOOD: At the end
of April last year.

00:17:22.006 --> 00:17:23.019
Look, I&apos;ve worn myself out.

00:17:23.019 --> 00:17:26.021
I think it probably started
during COVID and yeah.

00:17:26.021 --> 00:17:31.017
I mean, look, to be honest, a lot
of it was having to walk horses myself

00:17:31.017 --> 00:17:35.020
around the roads
because I was the only one that was able

00:17:35.020 --> 00:17:37.018
to do that a lot of the time.

00:17:37.018 --> 00:17:42.000
If we needed extra horses, I&apos;d have
to walk them around and back.

00:17:42.000 --> 00:17:44.004
I was exhausted, yes.

00:17:44.004 --> 00:17:45.017
I just couldn&apos;t do it anymore.

00:17:45.017 --> 00:17:49.011
Also, you touched on it before,
but having staffing issues

00:17:49.011 --> 00:17:53.011
and not being able to get staffing in
at that time,

00:17:53.011 --> 00:17:57.018
I just found myself seven days a week
and stressed off my head and kind

00:17:57.018 --> 00:17:59.006
of fell in a bit of a hole.

00:17:59.006 --> 00:18:01.018
CR PAUL BARKER: So if the bridge was built
within a year

00:18:01.018 --> 00:18:05.017
of the initial planning application going
in, what is the likelihood that

00:18:05.017 --> 00:18:07.024
you think Blazing Saddles would still be
open?

00:18:10.000 --> 00:18:12.000
CAROLINE WOOD: Oh, I can&apos;t answer that.

00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:13.012
I couldn&apos;t tell you.

00:18:13.012 --> 00:18:15.007
I mean,
I think that obviously it would

00:18:15.007 --> 00:18:16.019
have made life really

00:18:16.019 --> 00:18:18.022
- you know, it would have been much better.

00:18:18.022 --> 00:18:21.008
I think COVID probably did a lot of it.

00:18:21.008 --> 00:18:23.017
CR PAUL BARKER: Or the government response
too.

00:18:23.017 --> 00:18:25.006
TIM WOOD: I think also there&apos;s a lot

00:18:25.006 --> 00:18:28.007
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Sorry,
I think we&apos;re going to have to cut that

00:18:28.007 --> 00:18:31.018
off, but we&apos;ve had a couple of questions
and thank you so much for your time,

00:18:31.018 --> 00:18:33.006
Tim and Caroline.

00:18:33.006 --> 00:18:34.018
I appreciate that.

00:18:34.018 --> 00:18:36.023
We&apos;re going to move on
to our public questions.

00:18:36.023 --> 00:18:38.010
Thanks so much.

00:18:38.010 --> 00:18:41.004
So we do have some public questions
that came through prior

00:18:41.004 --> 00:18:42.016
to the Council meeting.

00:18:42.016 --> 00:18:44.010
So we have Andrew Kelly I think is here.

00:18:44.010 --> 00:18:48.008
Did you want to come up and speak,
ask your question directly?

00:18:48.008 --> 00:18:50.001
ANDREW KELLY: Yes, thanks very much.

00:18:50.001 --> 00:18:51.013
Andrew Kelly is my name.

00:18:51.013 --> 00:18:54.001
I&apos;m here with my wife, Jessie.

00:18:54.001 --> 00:18:57.022
Tonight a very full agenda for you all.

00:18:57.022 --> 00:19:02.022
I was trying to swot last night
and understand how these things operate,

00:19:02.022 --> 00:19:07.000
so this is a departure from the agenda.

00:19:07.000 --> 00:19:11.007
I understand that mostly you deal
with questions that are part

00:19:11.007 --> 00:19:12.020
of the agenda.

00:19:12.020 --> 00:19:17.014
So I wouldn&apos;t be here, obviously,
if I didn&apos;t think this was an

00:19:17.014 --> 00:19:21.011
important issue and again,
as was mentioned reasonably eloquently

00:19:21.011 --> 00:19:27.014
by the former speakers,
I think that the announcement that

00:19:27.014 --> 00:19:29.022
you made before the meeting
about wellbeing

00:19:29.022 --> 00:19:33.005
and environment probably impacts a
little bit on this particular issue

00:19:33.005 --> 00:19:35.008
that I want to bring to your attention.

00:19:35.008 --> 00:19:37.011
On reviewing the questions,
they do look a bit

00:19:37.011 --> 00:19:45.006
- a little short,
but I suppose I&apos;m also not quite sure

00:19:45.006 --> 00:19:48.019
whether or not there was a word
constraint upon that,

00:19:48.019 --> 00:19:53.016
so I thought maybe I&apos;d just give a
little bit of context for one minute.

00:19:53.016 --> 00:19:58.018
And whilst this may be an exercise
in futility, having spoken with the police

00:19:58.018 --> 00:20:06.011
and also the local member
and a Council officer about this,

00:20:06.011 --> 00:20:09.012
I suppose it would be easy to shrug
and say, &quot;Oh, well, this

00:20:09.012 --> 00:20:12.020
is a difficult issue
and maybe it&apos;s too hard.&quot;

00:20:12.020 --> 00:20:16.007
So what I&apos;m really looking for tonight
is some sort of engagement as to

00:20:16.007 --> 00:20:20.017
whether or not it&apos;s worthwhile
to do something about it

00:20:20.017 --> 00:20:24.002
as a community member
and gather some support or

00:20:24.002 --> 00:20:27.010
whether or not it&apos;s just easier to stay
in your lane and, you know,

00:20:27.010 --> 00:20:32.008
walk past what has been seen
in public spaces.

00:20:32.008 --> 00:20:36.018
So with that in mind,
there&apos;s these things called gatherings,

00:20:36.018 --> 00:20:40.003
as I&apos;ve come to understand,
and they&apos;re young people between the age

00:20:40.003 --> 00:20:46.009
of 12 and 16 ordinarily that gather
through some sort of social media medium

00:20:46.009 --> 00:20:49.009
to congregate in a particular place.

00:20:49.009 --> 00:20:52.020
At least two gatherings of
more than 150 young teenagers,

00:20:52.020 --> 00:20:58.000
and the police lady that I spoke
to suggested that the latest one was

00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:01.014
probably closer to 300 people,
so it&apos;s my estimation that the police

00:21:01.014 --> 00:21:05.003
thought it was closer to 300, engaging
in elicit

00:21:05.003 --> 00:21:10.017
and dangerous behaviour has occurred twice
in Torquay this year alone,

00:21:10.017 --> 00:21:14.020
one on Australia Day and one most recently
on the 11th of March.

00:21:14.020 --> 00:21:19.010
I can speak with great confidence
about the gathering on the 11th of March

00:21:19.010 --> 00:21:24.004
because I attended it three times,
twice on the night and once the morning

00:21:24.004 --> 00:21:30.010
after, to ascertain exactly what was going
on.

00:21:30.010 --> 00:21:33.007
The damage to self is self-evident.

00:21:33.007 --> 00:21:34.020
First responders

00:21:34.020 --> 00:21:38.000
- I notice there&apos;s a policeman here
with us, and he may well be well

00:21:38.000 --> 00:21:39.012
across this

00:21:39.012 --> 00:21:43.012
- having to look
after people that have some form

00:21:43.012 --> 00:21:47.020
of drug or alcohol on board, as opposed
to being able to

00:21:47.020 --> 00:21:53.007
- and babysitting, as opposed
to law enforcement must be a

00:21:53.007 --> 00:21:55.011
great frustration to them.

00:21:55.011 --> 00:21:58.012
The damage to self as well
as the public amenity is evident.

00:21:58.012 --> 00:22:01.024
So what I was interested in is what
is the Council doing to keep the community

00:22:01.024 --> 00:22:05.009
and these young people safe
by ensuring such activities are not able

00:22:05.009 --> 00:22:07.015
to happen again in our neighbourhood?

00:22:07.015 --> 00:22:10.017
Now, I make that with no experience
in this field at all,

00:22:10.017 --> 00:22:16.022
but I would have thought that it&apos;s easier
just to stop it before it happens than

00:22:16.022 --> 00:22:19.002
to deal with it when it is happening.

00:22:19.002 --> 00:22:21.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thanks
for your question, Andrew.

00:22:21.016 --> 00:22:24.019
I&apos;ll respond to that
because I know you have two questions.

00:22:24.019 --> 00:22:26.006
Actually, do we

00:22:26.006 --> 00:22:29.011
- oh, no, actually, did you want to

00:22:29.011 --> 00:22:32.013
- ANDREW KELLY: I think they do move on
from each other.

00:22:32.013 --> 00:22:35.019
Both of these have happened
at holiday periods or public holiday

00:22:35.019 --> 00:22:39.018
weekends, and the next of those
is Easter holidays, which is approaching,

00:22:39.018 --> 00:22:45.009
and young people emboldened by a lack
of action and accountability

00:22:45.009 --> 00:22:46.022
from our community leaders

00:22:46.022 --> 00:22:48.018
- and I put everyone in that.

00:22:48.018 --> 00:22:54.012
As parents, we have a very important role
to play as well, and being devoid

00:22:54.012 --> 00:22:57.007
of any tangible consequences
that I can see anyway

00:22:57.007 --> 00:23:00.005
- others may be able
to give me some examples

00:23:00.005 --> 00:23:03.016
of some consequences that have occurred
other than people being affected

00:23:03.016 --> 00:23:06.018
by illicit substances,
and particularly very, very young people

00:23:06.018 --> 00:23:13.007
- what can we as a community, inclusive
of the Council, lawmakers, politicians,

00:23:13.007 --> 00:23:17.012
all tiers, parents and the people
of Torquay do to counter this trend

00:23:17.012 --> 00:23:20.004
and put a stop to this
before a tragedy occurs?

00:23:20.004 --> 00:23:24.005
And yes,
I admit I&apos;ve been extremely scarred

00:23:24.005 --> 00:23:29.009
by what was witnessed on that night
with people in and out of consciousness,

00:23:29.009 --> 00:23:32.007
clearly drug affected, lying
on front yards, pulling people

00:23:32.007 --> 00:23:41.024
out of trees, and it just seems
to be a difficult issue that I&apos;m keen

00:23:41.024 --> 00:23:43.012
to get your feedback.

00:23:43.012 --> 00:23:46.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thanks, Andrew,
for your question.

00:23:46.002 --> 00:23:48.016
I appreciate you coming and speaking to us
and I can hear

00:23:48.016 --> 00:23:51.016
from you that it was really challenging
what you&apos;ve experienced

00:23:51.016 --> 00:23:53.014
and we share your concerns.

00:23:53.014 --> 00:23:57.019
Myself personally,
I have four young children and as a shire,

00:23:57.019 --> 00:24:00.003
we can share those concerns.

00:24:00.003 --> 00:24:05.018
And we&apos;re working with Torquay Police
and government support and agencies,

00:24:05.018 --> 00:24:08.013
schools and parents
to address these issues.

00:24:08.013 --> 00:24:11.013
Antisocial behaviour
in public places falls

00:24:11.013 --> 00:24:14.016
under the jurisdiction
of Victoria Police, who are aware

00:24:14.016 --> 00:24:17.008
of the recent gatherings in Torquay,
and I would like

00:24:17.008 --> 00:24:20.022
to acknowledge the attendance
of the current Torquay Acting Senior

00:24:20.022 --> 00:24:23.020
Sergeant, Andrew Harris,
who has actually come here

00:24:23.020 --> 00:24:27.013
to the meeting today, so thank you
for attending.

00:24:27.013 --> 00:24:31.022
And I would also like
to thank Surf Coast Local Area Commander,

00:24:31.022 --> 00:24:35.000
Inspector Monique Leffanue,
for providing a statement

00:24:35.000 --> 00:24:38.020
from Victoria Police, which I&apos;ll read out
because we passed on your concerns

00:24:38.020 --> 00:24:42.020
to them: &quot;Victoria Police are aware
of multiple gatherings

00:24:42.020 --> 00:24:46.005
at Torquay beaches which have been
attended by a large number of students

00:24:46.005 --> 00:24:48.023
from different schools across Torquay
and Geelong areas.

00:24:48.023 --> 00:24:52.003
We want everyone to have a safe
and enjoyable time on our beaches.

00:24:52.003 --> 00:24:54.024
However, underage drinking
and antisocial behaviour

00:24:54.024 --> 00:24:56.011
will not be tolerated.

00:24:56.011 --> 00:25:00.001
Local police have been in regular contact
with principals from schools

00:25:00.001 --> 00:25:03.001
across Torquay and Geelong region
to encourage parents

00:25:03.001 --> 00:25:06.016
to have a conversation with their kids
about the risks of underage drinking

00:25:06.016 --> 00:25:08.007
and antisocial behaviour.

00:25:08.007 --> 00:25:11.008
We want to reassure the community
that local police will continue

00:25:11.008 --> 00:25:16.001
to maintain a high police presence
with visible patrols on foot and on roads

00:25:16.001 --> 00:25:18.013
across Torquay&apos;s popular beach areas.

00:25:18.013 --> 00:25:21.024
Torquay police will continue to work
with the Council and community

00:25:21.024 --> 00:25:25.000
to address concerns and are open
to receiving any information

00:25:25.000 --> 00:25:27.023
relating to offending,
which impacts community safety.

00:25:27.023 --> 00:25:32.023
&quot;So that&apos;s the statement
from Victoria Police.

00:25:32.023 --> 00:25:36.010
Council will continue to liaise
with Victoria Police as the lead authority

00:25:36.010 --> 00:25:40.000
on this matter
and support the work Torquay police are

00:25:40.000 --> 00:25:42.002
doing in this difficult situation.

00:25:42.002 --> 00:25:46.019
Parental responsibility
is a crucial factor in ensuring the safety

00:25:46.019 --> 00:25:50.020
of young people and this is a key focus
of the work of Council

00:25:50.020 --> 00:25:52.013
and partner organisations.

00:25:52.013 --> 00:25:56.012
We do so knowing that COVID impacts
and cost of living increases are adding

00:25:56.012 --> 00:25:58.019
to the pressures felt by many families.

00:25:58.019 --> 00:26:02.014
Council supports the delivery of parent
and guardian skills training provided

00:26:02.014 --> 00:26:05.002
by the Drummond Street,
Geelong Regional Parenting

00:26:05.002 --> 00:26:08.000
and Barwon Child, Youth and Family.

00:26:08.000 --> 00:26:10.018
We operate the Youth Lounge
in Torquay three nights a week,

00:26:10.018 --> 00:26:13.019
which attracts up
to 60 people each evening.

00:26:13.019 --> 00:26:17.009
Council delivers State Government-funded
programs to support young people

00:26:17.009 --> 00:26:20.018
to gain employment, connect
with their community, foster youth arts

00:26:20.018 --> 00:26:24.024
and music and support mental health
and Council is supporting Head Space

00:26:24.024 --> 00:26:28.002
and Barwon Child, Youth and Family
to deliver to specialist alcohol

00:26:28.002 --> 00:26:33.019
and other drug and mental health services
in Torquay free of cost to residents.

00:26:33.019 --> 00:26:36.016
I&apos;ve been advised that many
of the young people gathering come

00:26:36.016 --> 00:26:39.009
from areas outside
of the Surf Coast Shire, and that

00:26:39.009 --> 00:26:43.016
is not an excuse, but it adds
to the complexity of managing the problem.

00:26:43.016 --> 00:26:46.019
As the Easter holidays approach,
we urge parents and guardians

00:26:46.019 --> 00:26:49.024
to provide safe and engaging environments
for their children.

00:26:49.024 --> 00:26:52.004
Furthermore,
we encourage community members

00:26:52.004 --> 00:26:57.007
to report any suspicious or dangerous
activities to Victoria Police immediately.

00:26:57.007 --> 00:27:02.011
And I can see that this may or may not hit
the mark for you, Andrew, but it

00:27:02.011 --> 00:27:06.021
is something that&apos;s complex and we do need
to work with Victoria Police and Shire,

00:27:06.021 --> 00:27:10.020
as we mentioned, is doing a number
of activities to engage, connect with

00:27:10.020 --> 00:27:14.023
and provide those supports to families
and our youth in the region.

00:27:14.023 --> 00:27:18.002
So I really appreciate you drawing this
to our attention and

00:27:18.002 --> 00:27:21.016
to enable this further conversation
around it.

00:27:21.016 --> 00:27:25.004
I think it&apos;s a work in progress.

00:27:25.004 --> 00:27:26.017
Thank you.

00:27:26.017 --> 00:27:28.024
ANDREW KELLY: Okay, proof
will be in the pudding.

00:27:28.024 --> 00:27:30.011
Thank you.

00:27:30.011 --> 00:27:34.017
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Our next question is
from Tony Watts.

00:27:34.017 --> 00:27:37.022
Did Tony Watts come
to the Council meeting today?

00:27:37.022 --> 00:27:39.010
No?

00:27:39.010 --> 00:27:42.019
So on that, I will read
out Tony&apos;s question and this one is more

00:27:42.019 --> 00:27:45.021
of an operational nature, so our CEO,
Robyn Seymour, will respond

00:27:45.021 --> 00:27:47.008
to Tony&apos;s question.

00:27:47.008 --> 00:27:48.021
So the question

00:27:48.021 --> 00:27:50.009
- this is from Tony

00:27:50.009 --> 00:27:55.002
- &quot;If Council decides
to postpone the development

00:27:55.002 --> 00:27:59.024
of the Deans Marsh Hub, we urge Council
to consider how the ongoing environmental

00:27:59.024 --> 00:28:02.004
damage
to our community hall can be

00:28:02.004 --> 00:28:04.022
slowed during this three-year
funding pause.

00:28:04.022 --> 00:28:07.019
Council records
will show our community has requested this

00:28:07.019 --> 00:28:10.002
protection work for at least five years.

00:28:10.002 --> 00:28:13.022
Further extended delay could render
our hall unusable, leaving us

00:28:13.022 --> 00:28:16.007
with no meeting facilities at all.

00:28:16.007 --> 00:28:19.019
Therefore, my question is
will Council consider how the ongoing

00:28:19.019 --> 00:28:23.016
environmental damage
to our heritage community hall can be

00:28:23.016 --> 00:28:27.009
slowed during the proposed three-year
funding pause?

00:28:27.009 --> 00:28:30.024
Our heritage hall,
Council&apos;s heritage hall, is in need

00:28:30.024 --> 00:28:32.011
of your protection.

00:28:32.011 --> 00:28:35.002
Thank you.

00:28:35.002 --> 00:28:39.002
&quot;ROBYN SEYMOUR: Thank you, Tony,
for your question and I can assure you

00:28:39.002 --> 00:28:42.012
that we will continue
to ensure that the building

00:28:42.012 --> 00:28:46.014
is maintained so it&apos;s safe to be used.

00:28:46.014 --> 00:28:49.021
We don&apos;t believe that
at the moment there&apos;s any immediate risks

00:28:49.021 --> 00:28:54.000
to the building
from water or other environmental factors

00:28:54.000 --> 00:28:59.002
that will prevent it
from being used safely in the coming years

00:28:59.002 --> 00:29:03.009
If we become aware of any new risks,
we will, of course,

00:29:03.009 --> 00:29:08.011
consider what needs to be done about that
and if you or anyone else believes there&apos;s

00:29:08.011 --> 00:29:12.016
something we haven&apos;t investigated,
please let us know

00:29:12.016 --> 00:29:18.018
by putting a service request
in so that we can look into it for you.

00:29:18.018 --> 00:29:24.008
There&apos;s probably a couple
of other important points of context

00:29:24.008 --> 00:29:27.002
in responding to your question.

00:29:27.002 --> 00:29:32.012
Like many Councils, and
in fact industry more broadly,

00:29:32.012 --> 00:29:36.005
our building renewal budget
is being impacted by cost escalations.

00:29:36.005 --> 00:29:41.000
We&apos;re seeing really significant cost
escalations across our program.

00:29:41.000 --> 00:29:44.003
And so in developing our draft budget,
we&apos;ve had to look

00:29:44.003 --> 00:29:49.013
at when we might have funding available
to fund some of our larger projects,

00:29:49.013 --> 00:29:54.018
such as the Winchelsea swimming pool
and also the Deans Marsh hall.

00:29:54.018 --> 00:30:00.000
So working with community in Deans Marsh
on the facility development plan

00:30:00.000 --> 00:30:03.004
for the Deans Marsh Community Hub
is proving very helpful

00:30:03.004 --> 00:30:07.021
to us understanding what options we have
with the current building,

00:30:07.021 --> 00:30:11.009
what these might cost
and therefore how much external funding

00:30:11.009 --> 00:30:15.009
we might need in developing the new hub
and added

00:30:15.009 --> 00:30:18.002
to our own financial contribution.

00:30:18.002 --> 00:30:24.018
So given all of that,
we will be bringing a plan

00:30:24.018 --> 00:30:30.016
to the Council meeting in May this year
and then there

00:30:30.016 --> 00:30:34.011
will be a further public consultation
on that draft plan based

00:30:34.011 --> 00:30:39.022
on the work we&apos;ve been doing
with the community in Deans Marsh.

00:30:39.022 --> 00:30:46.008
But given the heavy reliance we&apos;re likely
to have on external funding

00:30:46.008 --> 00:30:51.008
for the redevelopment,
the draft plan currently identifies

00:30:51.008 --> 00:30:54.007
- so when I say the draft plan,
I mean the draft budget

00:30:54.007 --> 00:30:56.014
- currently identifies a potential three

00:30:56.014 --> 00:31:00.011
- to five-year timeframe for us to line
up our funding and get support

00:31:00.011 --> 00:31:04.019
from other levels of funding in order
to deliver this important community

00:31:04.019 --> 00:31:06.006
facility.

00:31:06.006 --> 00:31:09.019
But again, just to reassure you,
in that timeframe we

00:31:09.019 --> 00:31:14.010
will ensure that the building
is maintained so it&apos;s safe and usable

00:31:14.010 --> 00:31:19.004
during this time until we can redevelop
the hub.

00:31:19.004 --> 00:31:20.016
Tony, thanks for your question.

00:31:22.020 --> 00:31:24.019
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you, Ms Seymour.

00:31:24.019 --> 00:31:30.005
I have just realised we needed
to actually note the presentations

00:31:30.005 --> 00:31:35.005
by Caroline and Tim Wood,
so can I have a mover to note the receipt

00:31:35.005 --> 00:31:38.007
of the written submission from Tim
and Caroline,

00:31:38.007 --> 00:31:43.011
and we have the recommendation
on the screen.

00:31:43.011 --> 00:31:46.018
Councillor Stapleton, moved
as per the recommendation.

00:31:46.018 --> 00:31:48.006
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Yes.

00:31:48.006 --> 00:31:49.020
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And seconded?

00:31:49.020 --> 00:31:51.007
Councillor Bodsworth.

00:31:51.007 --> 00:31:52.020
All in favour?

00:31:56.011 --> 00:31:58.002
Opposed?

00:31:58.002 --> 00:31:59.015
Did you vote, Paul?

00:31:59.015 --> 00:32:01.002
CR PAUL BARKER: Yes.

00:32:01.002 --> 00:32:02.015
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes, okay.

00:32:02.015 --> 00:32:04.006
The motion is carried unanimously.

00:32:04.006 --> 00:32:05.018
Thank you.

00:32:05.018 --> 00:32:07.014
We&apos;ll now move on to petitions.

00:32:07.014 --> 00:32:11.014
There are no petitions received tonight
and there are also no notices of motion

00:32:11.014 --> 00:32:13.002
for tonight&apos;s Council meeting.

00:32:13.002 --> 00:32:17.018
So we move on to the big part
of the meeting, the reports.

00:32:17.018 --> 00:32:26.019
So our first report is in relation
to the request to licence land adjacent

00:32:26.019 --> 00:32:28.007
to Painkalac Creek.

00:32:28.007 --> 00:32:31.024
The purpose of this report is for Council
to consider the request from landowner

00:32:31.024 --> 00:32:36.000
to grant exclusive licences
on Council-owned land and Council-managed

00:32:36.000 --> 00:32:39.005
Crown land for the purpose
of accessing a proposed bridge

00:32:39.005 --> 00:32:41.011
over the Painkalac Creek and Aireys Inlet.

00:32:41.011 --> 00:32:45.007
Officers are recommending that the Council
does not grant these licences.

00:32:45.007 --> 00:32:47.021
Do I have a mover?

00:32:47.021 --> 00:32:49.008
Councillor Bodsworth.

00:32:49.008 --> 00:32:50.021
Is it as per the recommendation?

00:32:50.021 --> 00:32:52.016
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Yes, thanks, Mayor.

00:32:52.016 --> 00:32:54.018
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And do I have
a seconder?

00:32:54.018 --> 00:32:56.005
Councillor Stapleton.

00:32:56.005 --> 00:32:58.007
Councillor Bodsworth, do you wish
to speak?

00:32:58.007 --> 00:32:59.024
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Thank you, Mayor.

00:32:59.024 --> 00:33:02.012
So I&apos;d like to start
by acknowledging the Wadawurrung

00:33:02.012 --> 00:33:05.016
and Eastern Maar traditional owners,
as Painkalac Creek is thought

00:33:05.016 --> 00:33:09.002
to have marked a boundary zone
between Wadawurrung and Gadubanud country

00:33:09.002 --> 00:33:11.023
and the Creek is now the boundary
between Wadawurrung

00:33:11.023 --> 00:33:15.024
and Eastern Maar registered
Aboriginal party areas.

00:33:15.024 --> 00:33:21.004
I believe that boundary status brings
an extra significance to Painkalac Creek.

00:33:21.004 --> 00:33:24.004
I also congratulate the Eastern Maar
Aboriginal Corporation

00:33:24.004 --> 00:33:28.002
on the hugely significant native title
determination announced this

00:33:28.002 --> 00:33:31.008
morning in Warnambool.

00:33:31.008 --> 00:33:35.009
I would like to thank Caroline and Tim
for your submission

00:33:35.009 --> 00:33:41.022
and I can tell you that
as a person who hates conflict,

00:33:41.022 --> 00:33:45.005
I don&apos;t relish this side
of sitting in the Council chair

00:33:45.005 --> 00:33:51.012
because I can see how deeply this
affects you both.

00:33:51.012 --> 00:33:56.023
It affects other people in the district
deeply as well on both sides

00:33:56.023 --> 00:34:03.023
of the argument and so I, like
all the rest of us, take this seriously

00:34:03.023 --> 00:34:10.004
and feel the emotional investment that
you have in this really deeply.

00:34:10.004 --> 00:34:14.019
So I thank you for coming along,
submitting to us and being part

00:34:14.019 --> 00:34:17.009
of this discussion tonight.

00:34:17.009 --> 00:34:18.022
I&apos;ll explain

00:34:18.022 --> 00:34:23.016
- I think the report explains the situation
well and I support the recommendation not

00:34:23.016 --> 00:34:27.012
to grant exclusive licences
as it&apos;s written.

00:34:27.012 --> 00:34:31.006
I&apos;ll explain my reasoning and look forward
to hearing from fellow Councillors.

00:34:33.015 --> 00:34:37.024
It&apos;s normal for development and use
of land, including farming operations,

00:34:37.024 --> 00:34:40.021
to be constrained by the nature
of the environment and the lay

00:34:40.021 --> 00:34:42.014
of the land.

00:34:42.014 --> 00:34:44.024
One option might be
to alter the environment

00:34:44.024 --> 00:34:48.024
to suit the farming operation or
the land use might be altered

00:34:48.024 --> 00:34:51.008
to suit the environment.

00:34:51.008 --> 00:34:54.009
To me,
if a natural unbridged waterway runs

00:34:54.009 --> 00:34:58.000
between the applicant&apos;s property
and a property they lease,

00:34:58.000 --> 00:35:00.016
that naturally limits options for use
and development

00:35:00.016 --> 00:35:02.017
of the separate properties.

00:35:02.017 --> 00:35:07.000
I don&apos;t believe we should intervene
to remove that natural limitation

00:35:07.000 --> 00:35:10.012
through the issuing
of a licence when that&apos;s not a privilege

00:35:10.012 --> 00:35:15.014
we extend to all landowners
and lessees facing similar constraints.

00:35:15.014 --> 00:35:19.005
At this time, in considering
whether or not to allow a licence,

00:35:19.005 --> 00:35:21.022
I believe the question
of public benefit that was central

00:35:21.022 --> 00:35:26.001
to VCAT&apos;s consideration
of the planning permit application

00:35:26.001 --> 00:35:30.005
is still relevant
and I believe the public benefit implicit

00:35:30.005 --> 00:35:34.004
in this licence application is minimal.

00:35:34.004 --> 00:35:37.000
The applicant&apos;s points
regarding the movement of livestock

00:35:37.000 --> 00:35:40.003
and farm vehicles describes a situation
that occurs on lots

00:35:40.003 --> 00:35:43.024
of rural roads in the shire and
around the world.

00:35:43.024 --> 00:35:49.003
It&apos;s not an extraordinary situation
that warrants a high-impact intervention.

00:35:49.003 --> 00:35:53.003
I do agree with the applicant&apos;s points
about Bambra Road potentially offering a

00:35:53.003 --> 00:35:57.016
great walking and cycling route if not
for risks and accessibility

00:35:57.016 --> 00:36:02.005
and amenity issues associated
with vehicle traffic, and further

00:36:02.005 --> 00:36:05.005
to that point,
although it&apos;s not the proposal before us,

00:36:05.005 --> 00:36:10.009
I could imagine a bridge that was not
for exclusive use and formed part

00:36:10.009 --> 00:36:14.001
of a public pathway
across the floodplain linking Fairhaven

00:36:14.001 --> 00:36:17.009
and areas and connecting
to a Painkalac loop walk

00:36:17.009 --> 00:36:21.011
as shown in the 2015 Aireys
to Eastern View Structure Plan.

00:36:21.011 --> 00:36:24.016
It could potentially
be licensed for non-exclusive

00:36:24.016 --> 00:36:29.008
commercial use,
but the primary benefit would be public.

00:36:29.008 --> 00:36:32.008
That&apos;s a discussion for another day.

00:36:32.008 --> 00:36:36.019
As far as the licence application
before us is concerned, I urge Councillors

00:36:36.019 --> 00:36:40.012
to support the recommendation
to not grant an exclusive licence.

00:36:40.012 --> 00:36:42.008
Thank you.

00:36:42.008 --> 00:36:45.013
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: Mayor,
I have a question to ask if I may.

00:36:45.013 --> 00:36:47.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Of the officers?

00:36:47.005 --> 00:36:48.018
CR SCHONFELDER: Yes.

00:36:48.018 --> 00:36:55.007
And my question is a bridge did exist
over the creek for some time.

00:36:55.007 --> 00:36:58.002
I&apos;d just like that to be confirmed.

00:36:58.002 --> 00:37:03.006
And my second question is
about traffic volumes and movements,

00:37:03.006 --> 00:37:08.019
whether in the roads described
from the Woods, has there been an increase

00:37:08.019 --> 00:37:12.024
in traffic volumes,
because I would suggest there would be?

00:37:15.009 --> 00:37:20.012
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Councillor Schonfelder,
there was a bridge across the Painkalac.

00:37:20.012 --> 00:37:24.002
In terms of traffic volumes
and how that&apos;s changed,

00:37:24.002 --> 00:37:26.008
I don&apos;t have that data with me.

00:37:26.008 --> 00:37:32.023
I can only kind of make a subjective sort
of comment about the fact that

00:37:32.023 --> 00:37:37.000
as the region becomes more popular,
you would anticipate that there would be

00:37:37.000 --> 00:37:40.024
more activity on the road
and that it would be getting busier,

00:37:40.024 --> 00:37:48.018
but I don&apos;t have the data to be able
to confirm that, unless anyone else does.

00:37:48.018 --> 00:37:50.008
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: Thank you.

00:37:50.008 --> 00:37:51.020
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

00:37:51.020 --> 00:37:53.008
Councillor Stapleton.

00:37:53.008 --> 00:37:56.004
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Thanks, Liz.

00:37:56.004 --> 00:38:00.005
Some decisions that come
to Council are harder to make than others

00:38:00.005 --> 00:38:03.014
and for me this one
is particularly challenging,

00:38:03.014 --> 00:38:08.013
and I do understand the investment,
both professional and personal,

00:38:08.013 --> 00:38:13.003
that the applicants, Tim and Caroline,
have made in wanting

00:38:13.003 --> 00:38:16.013
to install this bridge
and I really do understand their reasons

00:38:16.013 --> 00:38:19.005
for wanting it.

00:38:19.005 --> 00:38:23.022
Just also an acknowledgment
of your submission earlier, I would hate

00:38:23.022 --> 00:38:27.005
for anyone to think that we sit up here
and we don&apos;t care

00:38:27.005 --> 00:38:31.019
about the individual needs
of people involved.

00:38:31.019 --> 00:38:36.005
We care deeply and it is
all the more why it makes it such

00:38:36.005 --> 00:38:38.017
a difficult decision.

00:38:38.017 --> 00:38:44.000
However, as Council, we have a duty
to protect public land and

00:38:44.000 --> 00:38:48.005
in our Council plan, we have a goal
to ensure that growth and development

00:38:48.005 --> 00:38:53.007
across the shire are not at the expense
of environmental values.

00:38:53.007 --> 00:38:57.007
We also have a strategy in place
to protect significant habitats,

00:38:57.007 --> 00:39:00.009
landscapes and biodiversity.

00:39:00.009 --> 00:39:06.011
I&apos;m aware that in 2005 Council developed
the Painkalac Estuary Management Plan,

00:39:06.011 --> 00:39:08.023
which speaks
to the significant environmental

00:39:08.023 --> 00:39:11.024
and cultural values
of the Painkalac Creek and valley,

00:39:11.024 --> 00:39:16.010
and that at a national level there
is an ecological community listed

00:39:16.010 --> 00:39:19.018
for the Painkalac Estuary
under the Federal Environment Protection

00:39:19.018 --> 00:39:22.023
and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

00:39:22.023 --> 00:39:26.000
Interestingly, one
of the actions that I read

00:39:26.000 --> 00:39:29.014
in the Painkalac Estuary Management Plan
is to ensure that any structures,

00:39:29.014 --> 00:39:33.018
including signage, are low key
and do not impact on the landscape values

00:39:33.018 --> 00:39:35.023
of the site.

00:39:35.023 --> 00:39:39.004
With this in mind,
and the information that&apos;s been presented

00:39:39.004 --> 00:39:44.021
to us in our agenda report tonight,
we must consider whether public land

00:39:44.021 --> 00:39:49.019
of significant environmental value should
be licensed for private purposes.

00:39:49.019 --> 00:39:52.017
With the closure of Blazing Saddles,
it is hard

00:39:52.017 --> 00:39:56.010
to identify broad public benefit
that I believe would be required

00:39:56.010 --> 00:39:59.022
to justify granting a licence.

00:39:59.022 --> 00:40:05.012
I do appreciate the safety concerns
that Tim and Caroline have raised in terms

00:40:05.012 --> 00:40:10.006
of the movement of horses
and farm vehicles along Bambra Road and,

00:40:10.006 --> 00:40:12.024
as Councillor Bodsworth mentioned,
I think it&apos;s relevant

00:40:12.024 --> 00:40:17.019
to consider Council&apos;s longer-term
vision that&apos;s outlined in the 2015 Aireys

00:40:17.019 --> 00:40:21.021
Inlet Structure Plan,
which does outline a proposed pathway

00:40:21.021 --> 00:40:25.001
along Bambra Road
and could potentially mitigate some

00:40:25.001 --> 00:40:30.011
of the concerns that have been raised
around risks to the public, and part

00:40:30.011 --> 00:40:33.002
of that vision was also
to possibly connect other parts

00:40:33.002 --> 00:40:37.010
of the Painkalac Valley with walkways
to provide public access for people

00:40:37.010 --> 00:40:41.020
to enjoy the area in a low-key,
environmentally sensitive way.

00:40:44.000 --> 00:40:48.018
I should also note that residents have
regularly raised with me concerns

00:40:48.018 --> 00:40:54.014
around the speed limits on Bambra Road,
and I know that&apos;s somewhat of a diversion

00:40:54.014 --> 00:40:57.011
but it&apos;s relevant to some
of the safety concerns that have been

00:40:57.011 --> 00:41:00.018
raised and I hope that it&apos;s something
that Council can look at as part

00:41:00.018 --> 00:41:06.018
of the future amenity and safety for
all public accessing the Painkalac Valley.

00:41:06.018 --> 00:41:08.005
But getting back

00:41:08.005 --> 00:41:10.018
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: You&apos;ve actually
gone over time.

00:41:10.018 --> 00:41:12.005
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Oh, sorry.

00:41:12.005 --> 00:41:13.018
Thank you.

00:41:13.018 --> 00:41:16.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you,
Councillor Stapleton.

00:41:16.007 --> 00:41:19.009
Do any other Councillors wish to speak,
Councillor Schonfelder.

00:41:19.009 --> 00:41:21.006
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: Thank you, Mayor.

00:41:21.006 --> 00:41:24.013
And I concur with my fellow colleagues
that it&apos;s not always an easy task

00:41:24.013 --> 00:41:29.023
to make decisions in the chamber
concerning people&apos;s livelihoods.

00:41:29.023 --> 00:41:33.011
However, I should confess that I am
a hippophile,

00:41:33.011 --> 00:41:37.005
and I&apos;m not sure how many people here know
the meaning of that,

00:41:37.005 --> 00:41:40.005
but it means a lover of horses.

00:41:40.005 --> 00:41:43.013
I was a member
of the Barwon Valley Pony Club

00:41:43.013 --> 00:41:46.002
and I&apos;ve actually ridden
on roads where people have

00:41:46.002 --> 00:41:48.001
done burnouts deliberately.

00:41:48.001 --> 00:41:52.015
I&apos;ve actually ridden down my local road,
Andersons Road, Barrabool,

00:41:52.015 --> 00:41:55.000
where I was not far
from the Princes Highway

00:41:55.000 --> 00:42:02.009
and a dog chased me and I was about 11
and I ended up on the horse&apos;s neck.

00:42:02.009 --> 00:42:04.019
That&apos;s how dangerous that was.

00:42:04.019 --> 00:42:09.020
I believe the traffic volumes have
increased enormously

00:42:09.020 --> 00:42:15.013
and we welcome tourists
and we welcome their input

00:42:15.013 --> 00:42:20.004
to the local economy to help businesses,
and as far as our motto

00:42:20.004 --> 00:42:24.011
is concerned with wellbeing,
it does concern local businesses

00:42:24.011 --> 00:42:27.016
as well who employ local people.

00:42:27.016 --> 00:42:33.015
I feel the fact that a bridge did exist
over the creek has a strong bearing

00:42:33.015 --> 00:42:37.021
on this case and I believe that was used
for a long time.

00:42:37.021 --> 00:42:43.014
So I would ask my colleagues
to reconsider how they&apos;re feeling

00:42:43.014 --> 00:42:49.016
about this item because safety,
public safety and the safety

00:42:49.016 --> 00:42:52.018
of transporting livestock
across the creek,

00:42:52.018 --> 00:42:55.015
just seems very practical to me.

00:42:55.015 --> 00:43:02.008
And I do support helping the environment
and I believe that you both would as well

00:43:02.008 --> 00:43:07.015
and helping waterway areas,
and the fact that you mentioned

00:43:07.015 --> 00:43:11.021
about the Farmers Federation,
that they allow funding, and I know

00:43:11.021 --> 00:43:18.002
on Devon Road in Barrabool there&apos;s
an underpass under that road

00:43:18.002 --> 00:43:20.005
for livestock as well.

00:43:20.005 --> 00:43:27.017
Also, with fire danger,
we had an evacuation nearby recently

00:43:27.017 --> 00:43:32.024
where just over a week ago we had
a 37 degree day and I&apos;m just concerned

00:43:32.024 --> 00:43:40.007
about areas that are highly populated
and traffic movements when a fire occurs,

00:43:40.007 --> 00:43:44.024
what happens with the livestock,
and we see with Black Saturday there was

00:43:44.024 --> 00:43:51.004
like panic
and tragedies actually occurred.

00:43:51.004 --> 00:43:57.011
So I will be voting against this item
because I believe that a bridge

00:43:57.011 --> 00:43:58.023
should be allowed.

00:43:58.023 --> 00:44:02.018
Once again,
there was a bridge that did exist there

00:44:02.018 --> 00:44:10.012
and I just hope that my colleagues can see
the practical aspect

00:44:10.012 --> 00:44:13.004
of this that I&apos;ve reported.

00:44:13.004 --> 00:44:15.000
Thank you, Mayor.

00:44:15.000 --> 00:44:16.012
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

00:44:16.012 --> 00:44:18.000
Councillor Allen.

00:44:18.000 --> 00:44:19.012
CR GARY ALLEN: Thanks, Mayor.

00:44:19.012 --> 00:44:21.009
Could we just stop the clock for a moment?

00:44:21.009 --> 00:44:24.007
I just wanted to refer
to a point that Councillor Bodsworth made

00:44:24.007 --> 00:44:26.017
which I think is not accurate.

00:44:26.017 --> 00:44:30.017
The Supreme Court decision handed
down today extends the Eastern Maar,

00:44:30.017 --> 00:44:33.015
as far as I understand it,
to Kennett River, not as far

00:44:33.015 --> 00:44:35.008
as Painkalac Creek.

00:44:35.008 --> 00:44:40.017
I think perhaps, if that&apos;s the case,
we should set the record straight.

00:44:40.017 --> 00:44:43.022
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll pass that on
to Ms Gail Gatt.

00:44:43.022 --> 00:44:46.022
MS GAIL GATT: Yes, that&apos;s my understanding
from attending today

00:44:46.022 --> 00:44:48.021
and seeing the map that was provided.

00:44:48.021 --> 00:44:51.022
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: So what Councillor
Allen has said is correct,

00:44:51.022 --> 00:44:53.010
just to clarify?

00:44:53.010 --> 00:44:56.015
MS GAIL GATT: The area that was determined
today, the boundary is west

00:44:56.015 --> 00:44:58.002
of Kennett River.

00:44:58.002 --> 00:44:59.020
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Okay, thank you.

00:44:59.020 --> 00:45:03.004
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: If I can just clarify,
I was talking about the boundary

00:45:03.004 --> 00:45:06.011
of the registered Aboriginal party area,
which is a bit bureaucratic,

00:45:06.011 --> 00:45:12.001
but it does extend to the Painkalac,
whereas the native title determination,

00:45:12.001 --> 00:45:15.023
as Gail just outlined, does not,
so just to clarify.

00:45:15.023 --> 00:45:18.018
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Okay, thank you.

00:45:18.018 --> 00:45:21.004
CR GARY ALLEN: The journey
of the applicant relating

00:45:21.004 --> 00:45:25.001
to the existing permit held has been a
long and complex one.

00:45:25.001 --> 00:45:29.009
However, the changed circumstance to me
is a fairly straightforward one

00:45:29.009 --> 00:45:32.002
- blazing Saddles closed.

00:45:32.002 --> 00:45:36.004
The community benefit of employment
and tourism opportunities referred

00:45:36.004 --> 00:45:41.005
to in the VCAT determination relevant
to the permit have been significantly

00:45:41.005 --> 00:45:42.017
reduced.

00:45:42.017 --> 00:45:45.013
Therefore, we must turn our attention
to the question

00:45:45.013 --> 00:45:48.017
of who should
primarily benefit from Council-owned

00:45:48.017 --> 00:45:50.023
land and Council land managed

00:45:50.023 --> 00:45:55.000
- sorry, Crown land managed by the Council.

00:45:55.000 --> 00:45:59.016
There is little doubt in my mind that this
is the community, the public.

00:45:59.016 --> 00:46:01.024
We have a very strong tradition
in this country

00:46:01.024 --> 00:46:05.006
of not allowing exclusive private use
of Crown land.

00:46:07.010 --> 00:46:11.008
When we as a Council have the opportunity
to exercise our responsibility

00:46:11.008 --> 00:46:15.017
to manage Crown land,
particularly that surrounding waterways,

00:46:15.017 --> 00:46:20.023
we must act to protect water quality,
native flora and native fauna.

00:46:20.023 --> 00:46:25.000
We should decide in favour
of the common good.

00:46:25.000 --> 00:46:29.010
This view I believe is shared
by the majority of the Aireys Inlet,

00:46:29.010 --> 00:46:31.010
Fairhaven and Moggs Creek communities.

00:46:31.010 --> 00:46:34.022
For example, the Aireys Inlet
and District Association,

00:46:34.022 --> 00:46:40.012
which has a membership base of 450 people,
has clearly articulated their support

00:46:40.012 --> 00:46:44.012
for the preservation of the creek,
its special character,

00:46:44.012 --> 00:46:46.019
and that the issuing
of an exclusive licence

00:46:46.019 --> 00:46:51.008
to a private operator would be
inconsistent with the relevant provisions

00:46:51.008 --> 00:46:56.014
of the Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978.

00:46:56.014 --> 00:46:59.017
This view
is supported in the VCAT decision.

00:46:59.017 --> 00:47:03.018
The permit was granted because
of the economic and tourist benefit

00:47:03.018 --> 00:47:08.020
to the community but, and I quote
from the determination,

00:47:08.020 --> 00:47:13.017
&quot;It would have been quite a
different assessment exercise if,

00:47:13.017 --> 00:47:17.000
for example, the use
of the road was proposed

00:47:17.000 --> 00:47:23.002
on this Crown land for purely the benefit
of a residential landowner&quot;.

00:47:23.002 --> 00:47:27.001
Since the release of the meeting papers,
I have received no requests

00:47:27.001 --> 00:47:30.020
from shire residents
to grant an exclusive licence.

00:47:30.020 --> 00:47:32.016
Thank you.

00:47:32.016 --> 00:47:35.011
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Do any
other Councillors wish to speak.

00:47:35.011 --> 00:47:36.024
Councillor Hodge.

00:47:36.024 --> 00:47:40.004
CR ROSE HODGE: Yes, I was part
of the Council that made the decision not

00:47:40.004 --> 00:47:43.000
to grant the planning permit last time
and it was taken to VCAT

00:47:43.000 --> 00:47:47.000
and we were wrong, and I apologise
for the Woods and the years that have gone

00:47:47.000 --> 00:47:48.012
on from that.

00:47:48.012 --> 00:47:51.011
Now, I know things have changed
and I know it&apos;s licensing

00:47:51.011 --> 00:47:56.017
and when you look at 17.1 and 17.2
in why we did refuse it

00:47:56.017 --> 00:47:58.006
and VCAT overturned it.

00:47:58.006 --> 00:48:02.005
So I won&apos;t be supporting this item.

00:48:02.005 --> 00:48:06.005
I think we could have talked
to the Woods more, gone and had a look

00:48:06.005 --> 00:48:13.002
at the breeding program or whatever
is happening and I agree that there

00:48:13.002 --> 00:48:15.018
is safety needed around those roads.

00:48:15.018 --> 00:48:18.017
So I know it&apos;s been a very long
and drawn-out process and

00:48:18.017 --> 00:48:21.004
if COVID hadn&apos;t hit
and your business was there,

00:48:21.004 --> 00:48:23.004
that bridge would be in place now.

00:48:23.004 --> 00:48:24.019
So I won&apos;t be supporting this item.

00:48:28.009 --> 00:48:30.010
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Wellington.

00:48:33.006 --> 00:48:35.004
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thanks very much.

00:48:35.004 --> 00:48:38.001
Look, I also was present
at the previous Council

00:48:38.001 --> 00:48:40.022
which didn&apos;t support this.

00:48:40.022 --> 00:48:42.021
I think VCAT had a different view.

00:48:42.021 --> 00:48:45.007
I don&apos;t know that there&apos;s a right or
wrong about that.

00:48:45.007 --> 00:48:47.002
It&apos;s a matter of judgment really.

00:48:47.002 --> 00:48:49.010
But I was surprised that VCAT didn&apos;t
support it,

00:48:49.010 --> 00:48:53.022
usually I find VCAT pretty predictable,
but of course I respect that decision.

00:48:56.009 --> 00:48:59.006
I think, you know,
it was always the case that there were

00:48:59.006 --> 00:49:01.012
going to be two decisions associated
with this.

00:49:01.012 --> 00:49:06.015
One was a planning permit decision
and one was a decision about the licensing

00:49:06.015 --> 00:49:09.009
under the Crown Land (Reserves) Act.

00:49:09.009 --> 00:49:11.020
I emphasise it&apos;s not a personal matter
and I agree

00:49:11.020 --> 00:49:14.011
with Councillor Allen very much
in this regard.

00:49:14.011 --> 00:49:16.003
I&apos;m very sorry for the Woods.

00:49:16.003 --> 00:49:23.006
I know these planning issues are very
difficult and ones that go on

00:49:23.006 --> 00:49:27.000
for a long time are costly
and they&apos;re stressful and I&apos;m really sorry

00:49:27.000 --> 00:49:32.003
at a personal level about that,
but in terms of our job is always to look

00:49:32.003 --> 00:49:35.013
at the land, not the people,
not what the current people are doing

00:49:35.013 --> 00:49:37.018
but what the benefit is for the land.

00:49:37.018 --> 00:49:44.001
I was a bit surprised, actually,
that VCAT decided that the public benefit

00:49:44.001 --> 00:49:46.012
was so significant in the case
of a private business.

00:49:46.012 --> 00:49:51.013
So I think now that that private
business has closed, there

00:49:51.013 --> 00:49:56.022
is absolutely no justification for us
to approve a licence.

00:49:56.022 --> 00:49:59.020
In my view, we should never own that
public land unless there&apos;s

00:49:59.020 --> 00:50:02.010
a clearly demonstrable and,
most importantly,

00:50:02.010 --> 00:50:07.000
sustainable public benefit
and when that public benefit is dependent

00:50:07.000 --> 00:50:09.019
on the actions
of individuals who run businesses

00:50:09.019 --> 00:50:12.011
and own some land or lease some land,
or whatever,

00:50:12.011 --> 00:50:18.002
I think it&apos;s not a solid foundation
on which to make long-term

00:50:18.002 --> 00:50:20.014
planning decisions.

00:50:20.014 --> 00:50:24.012
So, from my perspective, there
is no difficulty in making this decision,

00:50:24.012 --> 00:50:27.022
but I do recognise it&apos;s a very difficult
decision for the Woods.

00:50:29.023 --> 00:50:34.016
I don&apos;t agree at all that it shows a lack
of good faith by Council.

00:50:34.016 --> 00:50:42.000
Council did reject this in the past
and things changed

00:50:42.000 --> 00:50:45.018
and any public benefit no longer exists.

00:50:45.018 --> 00:50:49.009
So I support the recommendation
wholeheartedly.

00:50:49.009 --> 00:50:51.000
In my view, no permit should issue

00:50:51.000 --> 00:50:54.011
- no licence, I should say, should issue.

00:50:54.011 --> 00:50:56.003
Thank you.

00:50:56.003 --> 00:50:57.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

00:50:57.016 --> 00:50:59.003
Councillor Gazzard.

00:50:59.003 --> 00:51:00.016
CR KATE GAZZARD: Thank you.

00:51:00.016 --> 00:51:04.003
Thank you, Caroline and Tim, for coming in
and presenting your submission.

00:51:04.003 --> 00:51:09.005
I do really sympathise the years
of hard work that you&apos;ve put in

00:51:09.005 --> 00:51:13.009
and I&apos;m sorry that you&apos;ve had
to close your business.

00:51:13.009 --> 00:51:17.010
I can imagine years
of this planning permit have taken,

00:51:17.010 --> 00:51:23.023
you know, a financial, emotional
and physical toll on you, but on balance,

00:51:23.023 --> 00:51:30.019
I think the environmental protection
of Painkalac Creek is important

00:51:30.019 --> 00:51:36.006
and the consideration for the whole
of the Aireys Inlet Community,

00:51:36.006 --> 00:51:38.021
on balance I support the recommendation.

00:51:40.022 --> 00:51:42.009
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

00:51:42.009 --> 00:51:43.022
Councillor Barker.

00:51:43.022 --> 00:51:45.009
CR PAUL BARKER: Thanks, Mayor.

00:51:45.009 --> 00:51:47.012
Had Blazing Saddles still been
in operation,

00:51:47.012 --> 00:51:49.021
I would have likely opposed this
recommendation,

00:51:49.021 --> 00:51:52.012
though it likely wouldn&apos;t have come
to this chamber.

00:51:52.012 --> 00:51:54.021
Since that business is now closed,
on the surface,

00:51:54.021 --> 00:51:57.010
the recommendation makes sense
as a bridge being built

00:51:57.010 --> 00:52:00.015
on public land would give primary benefit
to the adjacent landowner.

00:52:00.015 --> 00:52:04.008
But since hearing from Caroline and Tim,
I&apos;m satisfied that the recommendation

00:52:04.008 --> 00:52:05.021
is wrong.

00:52:05.021 --> 00:52:08.007
Secondary benefit to the public will come
as a result

00:52:08.007 --> 00:52:10.020
of opposing this recommendation
through the removal

00:52:10.020 --> 00:52:13.008
of agricultural traffic
on surrounding roads.

00:52:13.008 --> 00:52:15.017
Additionally,
I have concerns that the government

00:52:15.017 --> 00:52:17.021
response
over the last few years contributed

00:52:17.021 --> 00:52:21.000
to the closing of Blazing Saddles.

00:52:21.000 --> 00:52:23.008
If this bridge is constructed,
it paves the way

00:52:23.008 --> 00:52:26.012
to a similar business coming back.

00:52:26.012 --> 00:52:29.002
I would have liked
to have seen a more community-focused

00:52:29.002 --> 00:52:33.003
plan for this proposed development
in the first place.

00:52:33.003 --> 00:52:36.007
Including the community
on any journey that changes the way

00:52:36.007 --> 00:52:41.023
public land is used is essential
for a positive result for all involved.

00:52:41.023 --> 00:52:44.012
Another consideration
is the vegetation surrounding

00:52:44.012 --> 00:52:46.000
the area in question.

00:52:46.000 --> 00:52:48.014
Should a bushfire ever pass
through the region,

00:52:48.014 --> 00:52:52.008
having an additional creek crossing could
very well be essential in the future.

00:52:52.008 --> 00:52:56.003
I understand the rationale given
by those who are supporting

00:52:56.003 --> 00:52:58.014
the recommendation, but I
will not be supporting it.

00:53:00.016 --> 00:53:02.003
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

00:53:02.003 --> 00:53:04.016
CR SCHONFELDER: Mayor,
I just have one more question.

00:53:04.016 --> 00:53:06.019
It&apos;s been mentioned
about a business closing

00:53:06.019 --> 00:53:09.004
and we understand that Blazing
Saddles has closed,

00:53:09.004 --> 00:53:12.012
but the Woods have another business,
they breed

00:53:12.012 --> 00:53:15.018
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Do you have
a question, Councillor Schonfelder?

00:53:15.018 --> 00:53:19.005
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: Can I confirm that
they actually do have a business?

00:53:19.005 --> 00:53:22.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes,
we heard that when Caroline spoke to us,

00:53:22.005 --> 00:53:23.018
she has a

00:53:23.018 --> 00:53:25.005
- yes, that is the case.

00:53:25.005 --> 00:53:28.008
Councillor Bodsworth, do you wish
to make any closing statements?

00:53:28.008 --> 00:53:31.012
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Oh, look,
I thank everyone for their input on this

00:53:31.012 --> 00:53:34.010
because everybody has provided
a really thoughtful response

00:53:34.010 --> 00:53:37.003
to this recommendation
and I think we&apos;ve had a good debate.

00:53:37.003 --> 00:53:40.008
One thing that I&apos;d like to add
is that the Painkalac Creek has recently

00:53:40.008 --> 00:53:44.018
been listed as a salt-wedge estuary
and a new environmental protection

00:53:44.018 --> 00:53:49.013
and biodiversity conservation
threatened community listing,

00:53:49.013 --> 00:53:52.001
so in fairly recent times there&apos;s been
an extra

00:53:52.001 --> 00:53:56.005
- I guess it&apos;s bumped
up the conservation priority

00:53:56.005 --> 00:54:00.011
of the Painkalac Creek estuary.

00:54:00.011 --> 00:54:08.014
And as Councillor Stapleton said,
additional to what I said initially,

00:54:08.014 --> 00:54:13.018
I think granting a licence would somewhat
contradict our Council planned vision

00:54:13.018 --> 00:54:18.022
and a number of the strategies,
as Councillor Stapleton outlined.

00:54:18.022 --> 00:54:23.008
But in closing, I&apos;d like to pay tribute
to the applicant&apos;s contributions

00:54:23.008 --> 00:54:27.020
to the local community
and the good times enjoyed by patrons

00:54:27.020 --> 00:54:30.022
of their form of business over many years.

00:54:30.022 --> 00:54:33.019
I&apos;d like to pay tribute
to the other landholders in the valley

00:54:33.019 --> 00:54:38.008
who contribute to its conservation,
particularly those involved

00:54:38.008 --> 00:54:42.015
in the inspiring rewilding the valley
initiative, which is a work in progress.

00:54:42.015 --> 00:54:45.019
I thank the people of Aireys Inlet
and district for their engagement

00:54:45.019 --> 00:54:51.015
in civic life and staunch protection
of the environment and town character.

00:54:51.015 --> 00:54:53.010
Thank you all.

00:54:53.010 --> 00:54:55.018
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: We now put the motion
to a vote.

00:54:55.018 --> 00:54:58.016
All those in favour.

00:54:58.016 --> 00:55:01.015
All those opposed.

00:55:01.015 --> 00:55:03.003
And the motion is carried.

00:55:05.005 --> 00:55:09.011
We now move on
to Council Plan Progress Report Mid Year

00:55:09.011 --> 00:55:12.005
- CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Excuse me,
Mayor Stapleton [sic],

00:55:12.005 --> 00:55:13.022
I couldn&apos;t see how many hands were up.

00:55:13.022 --> 00:55:16.010
Can I just ask what the vote was, please?

00:55:16.010 --> 00:55:18.014
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: 6-3.

00:55:18.014 --> 00:55:21.011
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you.

00:55:21.011 --> 00:55:23.010
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Council Plan Progress

00:55:23.010 --> 00:55:24.022
- Mid Year 2.

00:55:24.022 --> 00:55:29.002
The purpose of this report is
to present the updated Council Plan Mid

00:55:29.002 --> 00:55:31.013
Year 2 Progress Report to Council.

00:55:31.013 --> 00:55:33.019
Thank you.

00:55:33.019 --> 00:55:37.015
I note that officers have an updated
recommendation that is up on the screen

00:55:37.015 --> 00:55:39.023
to note a couple of changes
with the attachment.

00:55:39.023 --> 00:55:41.014
Jake, can we put that up, thanks.

00:55:52.001 --> 00:55:55.016
So for those that can see there,
the recommendation is

00:55:55.016 --> 00:55:59.001
&quot;That Council notes the Council Plan Mid
Year 2 Progress Report subject

00:55:59.001 --> 00:56:01.021
to the following amendments: Strategy 5

00:56:01.021 --> 00:56:04.024
- Pathway Strategy being amended to
in progress

00:56:04.024 --> 00:56:06.016
- it was initially stated as complete

00:56:06.016 --> 00:56:08.003
- &quot;Strategy 5

00:56:08.003 --> 00:56:12.015
- G21 Integrated Transport Strategy amended
to in progress; Strategy 15

00:56:12.015 --> 00:56:16.003
- first point under &apos;What We&apos;ll Do&apos; amended
from &apos;Collaborate

00:56:16.003 --> 00:56:19.022
with the Circular Economy team
and Environmental Sustainability team to&apos;

00:56:19.022 --> 00:56:23.016
to &apos;Connect businesses with ethical,
social and sustainability initiatives&apos;.

00:56:23.016 --> 00:56:27.015
&quot;Do I have a mover of a motion?

00:56:27.015 --> 00:56:29.020
Councillor Stapleton, is it
as per the amended

00:56:29.020 --> 00:56:31.016
- the updated recommendation?

00:56:31.016 --> 00:56:33.003
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Yes.

00:56:33.003 --> 00:56:34.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

00:56:34.016 --> 00:56:36.003
And a seconder?

00:56:36.003 --> 00:56:37.016
Councillor Gazzard.

00:56:37.016 --> 00:56:39.017
Do you wish to speak,
Councillor Stapleton?

00:56:39.017 --> 00:56:41.005
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: I do.

00:56:41.005 --> 00:56:43.013
Thank you, Mayor Pattison.

00:56:43.013 --> 00:56:47.014
This is a really terrific report
and provides a great summary

00:56:47.014 --> 00:56:53.001
of how Council is tracking halfway
through our Council term and there&apos;s a lot

00:56:53.001 --> 00:56:55.014
to be proud of in it
and I do encourage the community

00:56:55.014 --> 00:56:59.018
to read the report in detail
to just see how much is covered.

00:56:59.018 --> 00:57:04.020
But I&apos;d like to just speak to a number
of highlights from my perspective.

00:57:04.020 --> 00:57:09.004
Strategy 1, which is working
with traditional owners in our community

00:57:09.004 --> 00:57:13.009
to achieve reconciliation,
and there&apos;s been so much progress

00:57:13.009 --> 00:57:18.018
under this theme from very public actions,
like changing the way we acknowledge

00:57:18.018 --> 00:57:22.009
the 26th of January
and the recent introduction

00:57:22.009 --> 00:57:27.023
of the Pilk Purriyn event this year
to some less public behind-the-scenes

00:57:27.023 --> 00:57:32.008
work that people may not necessarily be
aware of, like creating a network

00:57:32.008 --> 00:57:35.020
of councils on both Eastern Maar
and Wadawurrung country

00:57:35.020 --> 00:57:39.008
to pursue partnerships in collaboration,
which we know is so important

00:57:39.008 --> 00:57:42.023
to achieving this goal.

00:57:42.023 --> 00:57:46.004
Under the theme
of healthy connected communities,

00:57:46.004 --> 00:57:49.010
there&apos;s obvious things
like delivering really important social

00:57:49.010 --> 00:57:54.014
infrastructure and open spaces,
and then there&apos;s things like strategy 6,

00:57:54.014 --> 00:57:56.004
enabling communities.

00:57:56.004 --> 00:57:59.014
This has been a really strong focus
of this Council.

00:57:59.014 --> 00:58:02.007
Since the very early days when
we first came together,

00:58:02.007 --> 00:58:05.017
it was something that we highlighted
and it&apos;s so rewarding

00:58:05.017 --> 00:58:08.024
to see that there&apos;s been so much progress
in this space.

00:58:08.024 --> 00:58:12.011
A couple of things
to highlight are the recently completed

00:58:12.011 --> 00:58:17.022
Bob Pettitt Bike Park project in Jan Juc,
which was very much led by the community

00:58:17.022 --> 00:58:20.019
and embraced the whole concept
of enabling communities

00:58:20.019 --> 00:58:24.016
and has clearly had really great outcomes,
and the other one

00:58:24.016 --> 00:58:30.002
is a streamlined community grants program,
which has also had more funding allocated

00:58:30.002 --> 00:58:33.015
to it, and this really does provide
the community with an opportunity

00:58:33.015 --> 00:58:37.022
to take the lead on projects
and we know there&apos;s already been a

00:58:37.022 --> 00:58:42.013
great uptake across the various grants
that are available.

00:58:42.013 --> 00:58:48.000
There&apos;s so much that could be said
under the environmental leadership theme.

00:58:48.000 --> 00:58:50.024
Strategy 7, which is
to protect significant habitats

00:58:50.024 --> 00:58:54.014
and landscapes and biodiversity,
there&apos;s been significant work

00:58:54.014 --> 00:58:58.014
on the Karaaf, deepening our understanding
of the issues there, and working closely

00:58:58.014 --> 00:59:02.012
with community and the relevant agencies
on a way forward.

00:59:02.012 --> 00:59:07.001
Our submission to Southern Rural Water
for the Anglesea River; strategy 8,

00:59:07.001 --> 00:59:10.019
reducing greenhouse gas emissions,
Council&apos;s reduced corporate emissions

00:59:10.019 --> 00:59:12.017
by 41%.

00:59:12.017 --> 00:59:16.012
We now purchase 100% renewable energy.

00:59:16.012 --> 00:59:18.017
We&apos;ve adopted a zero emissions target.

00:59:18.017 --> 00:59:21.000
We&apos;re now certified as carbon neutral.

00:59:21.000 --> 00:59:24.005
We&apos;ve installed solar and battery
across Council facilities,

00:59:24.005 --> 00:59:28.007
we&apos;ve installed EV charging stations
at Council&apos;s office and depots in Torquay

00:59:28.007 --> 00:59:30.023
and Winchelsea
and we&apos;ll be installing them

00:59:30.023 --> 00:59:34.013
for community use in townships
across the shire.

00:59:34.013 --> 00:59:37.002
It&apos;s great
to see that in the next 18 months there

00:59:37.002 --> 00:59:40.015
will be a focus on removing gas
from Council facilities

00:59:40.015 --> 00:59:43.024
and also working more closely
with community to support projects that

00:59:43.024 --> 00:59:47.017
will get us closer to net zero emissions.

00:59:47.017 --> 00:59:51.011
Under strategy 10, which is adapting
to a change in climate, there&apos;s a couple

00:59:51.011 --> 00:59:56.010
of actions proposed for the next 18 months
which I think are super important.

00:59:56.010 --> 01:00:00.018
One is reviewing the management
of the unsealed road network and shifting

01:00:00.018 --> 01:00:06.002
to a more proactive maintenance program
on areas that are seen to be vulnerable

01:00:06.002 --> 01:00:10.000
to storm events, and the second one there
is undertaking drainage

01:00:10.000 --> 01:00:14.019
catchment management studies,
which we also know are very much needed.

01:00:14.019 --> 01:00:16.013
I&apos;ve still got a little time.

01:00:16.013 --> 01:00:18.000
Sustainable growth

01:00:18.000 --> 01:00:20.009
- I&apos;d really like
to highlight the work undertaken

01:00:20.009 --> 01:00:24.018
under strategy 12 to improve access
to affordable accommodation.

01:00:24.018 --> 01:00:28.005
With very limited resources,
Council has achieved so much in the

01:00:28.005 --> 01:00:30.005
past 18 months in this space.

01:00:30.005 --> 01:00:33.014
We have an EOI process under way
for the provision of social

01:00:33.014 --> 01:00:37.001
and affordable housing at Fraser Drive
in Aireys Inlet.

01:00:37.001 --> 01:00:41.019
Council secured a $200,000 grant
to undertake a major integrated planning

01:00:41.019 --> 01:00:43.020
project
for the McMillan Street precinct

01:00:43.020 --> 01:00:45.019
in Anglesea.

01:00:45.019 --> 01:00:47.012
That&apos;s progressing well.

01:00:47.012 --> 01:00:50.014
We&apos;re working on a tiny house trial to get
under way this year,

01:00:50.014 --> 01:00:55.012
and I&apos;m really excited by the potential
for tiny houses in appropriate places

01:00:55.012 --> 01:00:58.014
and I really look forward to hearing more
from officers as they work

01:00:58.014 --> 01:01:02.013
through the necessary framework
and parameters for this trial.

01:01:02.013 --> 01:01:05.002
Finally, I&apos;d like
to highlight the work completed

01:01:05.002 --> 01:01:07.007
under our arts and creativity theme.

01:01:07.007 --> 01:01:12.011
We have a new Develop Arts Grant
of $15,000 which has been so successful

01:01:12.011 --> 01:01:15.001
and we know that&apos;s in really high demand.

01:01:15.001 --> 01:01:18.008
The Anglesea art space continues
to support local artists, with

01:01:18.008 --> 01:01:22.003
more than 300 artists last year benefiting
from exhibitions

01:01:22.003 --> 01:01:25.003
and professional development,
and officers are close

01:01:25.003 --> 01:01:31.014
to completing the 2023
to 2031 Creative Places Strategy,

01:01:31.014 --> 01:01:35.023
which we should see mid-year
and will provide a suite of actions

01:01:35.023 --> 01:01:38.005
for Council to deliver under that theme.

01:01:38.005 --> 01:01:39.018
Thank you.

01:01:39.018 --> 01:01:42.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you,
Councillor Stapleton.

01:01:42.007 --> 01:01:44.006
Councillor Gazzard, did you wish to speak.

01:01:44.006 --> 01:01:45.019
CR KATE GAZZARD: Yes, thank you.

01:01:45.019 --> 01:01:48.006
Councillor Stapleton has stolen
all the highlights.

01:01:48.006 --> 01:01:49.021
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Oh, I&apos;m sorry.

01:01:49.021 --> 01:01:52.002
CR KATE GAZZARD: So I won&apos;t repeat what
she said.

01:01:52.002 --> 01:01:54.000
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: I&apos;m just saving time.

01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:55.012
CR KATE GAZZARD: Yes.

01:01:55.012 --> 01:01:58.022
I&apos;d just like to say all of the strategies
and principles are so important

01:01:58.022 --> 01:02:00.009
and it&apos;s really

01:02:00.009 --> 01:02:02.010
- so much work was put
into the Council plan,

01:02:02.010 --> 01:02:05.000
it&apos;s really gratifying to see it come
to fruition

01:02:05.000 --> 01:02:09.000
and that we&apos;re actually having an impact.

01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:14.009
I think, from a personal point of view,
I have been on the receiving end

01:02:14.009 --> 01:02:19.001
of the maternal child health nurse
services having had a baby last year

01:02:19.001 --> 01:02:22.007
and I was so impressed.

01:02:22.007 --> 01:02:27.014
Like we know what goes on,
but the support that they gave me

01:02:27.014 --> 01:02:31.021
through some difficult times
and the resources provided

01:02:31.021 --> 01:02:35.003
and just the care was outstanding.

01:02:35.003 --> 01:02:41.020
So I feel really proud that Council are
providing these services to our community

01:02:41.020 --> 01:02:45.006
and particularly mothers and babies,
who often you&apos;re

01:02:45.006 --> 01:02:48.005
in quite a vulnerable phase of life.

01:02:48.005 --> 01:02:51.002
So yes, I just wanted to add in that bit.

01:02:51.002 --> 01:02:52.015
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:02:52.015 --> 01:02:54.002
Do any other Councillors

01:02:54.002 --> 01:02:55.015
- Councillor Allen?

01:02:55.015 --> 01:02:57.003
CR GARY ALLEN: Oh, thanks, Mayor.

01:02:57.003 --> 01:02:59.013
Look, I&apos;d just like
to highlight the changed format

01:02:59.013 --> 01:03:02.006
of the presentation
of the report detailing key progress,

01:03:02.006 --> 01:03:04.011
what is planned
to be done in the next 18 months,

01:03:04.011 --> 01:03:08.018
and the reasons why some elements
will slow down or in fact cease

01:03:08.018 --> 01:03:13.022
and I think that it is a clear
and realistic assessment of our progress.

01:03:13.022 --> 01:03:17.011
It&apos;s more transparent
and I really congratulate the officers

01:03:17.011 --> 01:03:20.004
for implementing this change.

01:03:20.004 --> 01:03:21.016
Thank you.

01:03:21.016 --> 01:03:23.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:03:23.004 --> 01:03:25.008
Councillor Wellington, did you wish
to speak?

01:03:29.019 --> 01:03:32.013
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;ve just got
a couple of questions.

01:03:32.013 --> 01:03:34.006
I&apos;ve got three questions, actually.

01:03:34.006 --> 01:03:37.011
One is one
of the commitments going forward is

01:03:37.011 --> 01:03:41.009
to continue to explore best ways to engage
with Traditional Owners

01:03:41.009 --> 01:03:45.007
and First Nation community members
and I just wondered how many there are

01:03:45.007 --> 01:03:50.018
and how many we have contact with
and have got engagement with.

01:03:50.018 --> 01:03:52.011
So do we have any

01:03:52.011 --> 01:03:56.017
- first of all,
how many First Nations people do we have

01:03:56.017 --> 01:04:02.015
in our shire and, secondly,
have we managed to make contact with most

01:04:02.015 --> 01:04:04.002
of them or do we

01:04:04.002 --> 01:04:05.020
- you know, how do we

01:04:05.020 --> 01:04:08.013
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll pass
that question on to our CEO.

01:04:08.013 --> 01:04:10.023
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Thank you,
Councillor Wellington.

01:04:10.023 --> 01:04:13.009
I&apos;ll start with the second question first.

01:04:13.009 --> 01:04:16.023
Our primary way that we work
with our First Nations people is

01:04:16.023 --> 01:04:26.002
through the registered groups and so
we predominantly work with the Wadawurrung

01:04:26.002 --> 01:04:31.013
and also Eastern Maar, which isn&apos;t
to say that we don&apos;t then work with some

01:04:31.013 --> 01:04:41.017
of our local First Nations people
particularly in Lorne and other areas,

01:04:41.017 --> 01:04:46.007
but our first point of call
and our primary mechanism for working

01:04:46.007 --> 01:04:48.013
with our First Nations people
is absolutely

01:04:48.013 --> 01:04:53.000
through those registered groups, the RAPs,
and that

01:04:53.000 --> 01:04:58.023
is how we ensure that we are responding
to the needs

01:04:58.023 --> 01:05:02.013
of the broader First Nations communities.

01:05:02.013 --> 01:05:08.020
We do work with and have through a range
of our events that we&apos;ve run

01:05:08.020 --> 01:05:13.012
and grant programs that we&apos;ve supported,
whether it&apos;s our artists or some

01:05:13.012 --> 01:05:20.007
of our other NAIDOC and other events,
worked more specifically with individuals

01:05:20.007 --> 01:05:23.000
within our First Nations community.

01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:27.022
In terms of the number
of First Nations people in the broader

01:05:27.022 --> 01:05:32.021
shire, without going to kind
of census data or other things,

01:05:32.021 --> 01:05:39.024
it&apos;s difficult for me to actually speak
to the total number

01:05:39.024 --> 01:05:45.022
of First Nations people in our shire
and even the data that

01:05:45.022 --> 01:05:49.002
is publicly available isn&apos;t
necessarily very accurate.

01:05:49.002 --> 01:05:55.000
So it&apos;s hard to assess the total number,
Councillor Wellington.

01:05:55.000 --> 01:05:57.010
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Did
you have another question,

01:05:57.010 --> 01:05:58.022
Councillor Wellington?

01:05:58.022 --> 01:06:02.016
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: There&apos;s another
comment in the report that we&apos;ll provide

01:06:02.016 --> 01:06:06.001
support to the Barwon Water-led
Thomson Valley recycled water business

01:06:06.001 --> 01:06:07.013
case and I just wondered

01:06:07.013 --> 01:06:10.003
- I don&apos;t recall a Council decision
about that

01:06:10.003 --> 01:06:12.000
and I presume it means financial support.

01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:14.017
I just wondered if someone could tell us
what that means.

01:06:16.018 --> 01:06:18.014
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Sorry, through you.

01:06:18.014 --> 01:06:21.010
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Councillor Wellington,
that really relates

01:06:21.010 --> 01:06:24.002
to the work that we&apos;re doing as part
of the collective work

01:06:24.002 --> 01:06:27.022
on our stormwater management
and the Karaaf and so

01:06:27.022 --> 01:06:33.023
the State Government committed $230,000,
or something of that magnitude,

01:06:33.023 --> 01:06:38.000
to really do the next phase
in the feasibility towards developing

01:06:38.000 --> 01:06:45.005
a business case for the pipeline,
for the recycled water, and one

01:06:45.005 --> 01:06:51.019
of the things that we&apos;ve been working on
and Council have been provided updates on

01:06:51.019 --> 01:06:56.011
is the fact that that pipeline potentially
provides an opportunity

01:06:56.011 --> 01:07:03.020
to remove water going into the Karaaf
and allow our stormwater to be mixed

01:07:03.020 --> 01:07:11.005
- shandied with the recycled water
to become productive water for high-value

01:07:11.005 --> 01:07:12.021
agriculture in the Thomson Valley.

01:07:12.021 --> 01:07:17.010
That&apos;s really what that particular
item relates to.

01:07:17.010 --> 01:07:20.003
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thanks, yes,
and I am aware of that.

01:07:20.003 --> 01:07:23.024
It just sounded
as though the project may be contributing

01:07:23.024 --> 01:07:27.008
financial resources to do a business case,
but I think what you&apos;re saying

01:07:27.008 --> 01:07:30.024
is we&apos;re working on an interagency level.

01:07:30.024 --> 01:07:33.017
And the third one
is that I saw that we&apos;re planning

01:07:33.017 --> 01:07:37.012
to confirm Council&apos;s approach to the Voice
to Parliament referendum

01:07:37.012 --> 01:07:39.015
and I just wondered whether Council

01:07:39.015 --> 01:07:42.019
- I wouldn&apos;t have thought Council even has
a vote in that referendum.

01:07:42.019 --> 01:07:45.014
Is that correct, or do we get a vote as

01:07:45.014 --> 01:07:48.003
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: On that one,
I can answer that one.

01:07:48.003 --> 01:07:54.019
We had a briefing on that and it&apos;s
around Council&apos;s position in the sense

01:07:54.019 --> 01:07:56.022
of our civic leadership role.

01:07:56.022 --> 01:07:59.024
It&apos;s not
about having a vote in the referendum.

01:07:59.024 --> 01:08:02.007
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: We don&apos;t have
a vote on it?

01:08:02.007 --> 01:08:04.000
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No, that&apos;s right.

01:08:04.000 --> 01:08:05.020
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thanks, right.

01:08:05.020 --> 01:08:07.008
I&apos;ll talk, if that&apos;s okay.

01:08:07.008 --> 01:08:09.009
Look, I think it&apos;s good
to read the report.

01:08:09.009 --> 01:08:11.001
It&apos;s nicely presented.

01:08:11.001 --> 01:08:14.015
I do think we need to move
to a situation where we&apos;re measuring

01:08:14.015 --> 01:08:16.014
outcomes, not just things that we&apos;re doing

01:08:16.014 --> 01:08:19.019
- not just reporting things that
we&apos;re doing, reporting activities.

01:08:19.019 --> 01:08:23.008
So there&apos;s a lot
of activities that we&apos;re doing

01:08:23.008 --> 01:08:26.001
and I&apos;m sure they&apos;re interesting,
but they don&apos;t actually

01:08:26.001 --> 01:08:29.003
- there&apos;s very few areas in the
progress report that actually talk

01:08:29.003 --> 01:08:33.014
about what we&apos;ve achieved
and my key issues around that relate

01:08:33.014 --> 01:08:38.012
to things like the Karaaf,
where we&apos;ve done processes doing

01:08:38.012 --> 01:08:45.020
reports and investigations,
but I remain really concerned that

01:08:45.020 --> 01:08:49.003
we&apos;re not actually addressing the key
issues of the Karaaf, which

01:08:49.003 --> 01:08:54.012
is really contaminated
and damaging water flow into the Karaaf,

01:08:54.012 --> 01:08:59.003
which we are continuing to develop really
as we develop more housing in Torquay.

01:08:59.003 --> 01:09:01.022
So I&apos;m concerned about the lack
of outcome focus,

01:09:01.022 --> 01:09:05.008
that we&apos;re talking about processes,
we&apos;re doing lots of things and many

01:09:05.008 --> 01:09:08.000
of them are good, I know that many
of them lead to outcomes,

01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:11.015
but we don&apos;t actually say what they are
and we don&apos;t have a way of measuring them

01:09:11.015 --> 01:09:15.003
and I would hope that we would give
a framework for measurement and reporting

01:09:15.003 --> 01:09:18.008
to the community that&apos;s not just
about how many things have we done or

01:09:18.008 --> 01:09:20.022
what have they been,
but what have we actually achieved

01:09:20.022 --> 01:09:22.009
as a result of that.

01:09:22.009 --> 01:09:26.006
I&apos;m still confused, and not
in any particular order

01:09:26.006 --> 01:09:29.007
- generally I support the themes
in the plan,

01:09:29.007 --> 01:09:34.023
but I&apos;ve always thought there&apos;s a
big theme missing, which is accessible,

01:09:34.023 --> 01:09:37.007
appropriate
and effective services or something

01:09:37.007 --> 01:09:38.019
around service quality.

01:09:38.019 --> 01:09:42.001
We just don&apos;t address it in the plan
and therefore we don&apos;t report on it.

01:09:42.001 --> 01:09:43.015
And I think we&apos;ve got big gaps.

01:09:43.015 --> 01:09:48.018
We know we&apos;ve got big gaps in access
to services, in the quality of services

01:09:48.018 --> 01:09:50.005
in some areas.

01:09:50.005 --> 01:09:54.001
This is the only plan I&apos;ve ever been
involved in with a service-based

01:09:54.001 --> 01:09:57.003
organisation where the quality
of services doesn&apos;t rate a mention

01:09:57.003 --> 01:09:58.016
in the strategy.

01:09:58.016 --> 01:10:02.006
So I think there&apos;s an issue
with the strategy, with the plan then

01:10:02.006 --> 01:10:05.009
and the strategy.

01:10:05.009 --> 01:10:09.000
Social and affordable housing,
I&apos;m confused about the target market,

01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:12.017
whether we&apos;re talking about housing
for workers or housing for people

01:10:12.017 --> 01:10:15.018
on low incomes or housing
for elderly people who need to retire.

01:10:15.018 --> 01:10:19.020
It seems to me an extremely vague issue
and we&apos;re giving away large

01:10:19.020 --> 01:10:23.007
- or we&apos;re proposing
to potentially give away large really

01:10:23.007 --> 01:10:26.009
valuable parcels of land
without being clear

01:10:26.009 --> 01:10:29.021
about what the public benefit will be
and what the target market is,

01:10:29.021 --> 01:10:31.009
so I&apos;m concerned about that.

01:10:31.009 --> 01:10:34.019
I think that it did strike me

01:10:34.019 --> 01:10:38.005
- I was driving past Deakin University the
other day and we&apos;ve got signs

01:10:38.005 --> 01:10:43.007
up saying student accommodation,
encouraging people to apply,

01:10:43.007 --> 01:10:45.010
and it occurred
to me that we may well have a lot

01:10:45.010 --> 01:10:48.003
of accommodation
on our doorstep that&apos;s not really used

01:10:48.003 --> 01:10:50.003
much over the summer period
and I don&apos;t know

01:10:50.003 --> 01:10:53.018
whether that has been explored,
but if not, I would really encourage it

01:10:53.018 --> 01:10:55.010
to be explored.

01:10:55.010 --> 01:10:57.006
I&apos;m concerned about the Karaaf.

01:10:57.006 --> 01:11:03.000
I&apos;m concerned about if we&apos;re developing
a voice because we think we&apos;re community

01:11:03.000 --> 01:11:06.004
leaders, if we&apos;re developing a position
on the Voice to Parliament,

01:11:06.004 --> 01:11:09.014
I don&apos;t think that&apos;s our leadership role
at all and I will object

01:11:09.014 --> 01:11:11.006
to that when we do it, obviously.

01:11:11.006 --> 01:11:13.009
I&apos;m very concerned
about the heritage status

01:11:13.009 --> 01:11:16.009
of Deans Marsh hall in strategy 11.

01:11:16.009 --> 01:11:17.022
We&apos;re committing to a strategy

01:11:17.022 --> 01:11:21.007
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Wellington
, you&apos;re now 10 seconds over.

01:11:21.007 --> 01:11:23.024
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: And I&apos;ve got
a couple of questions

01:11:23.024 --> 01:11:26.007
about grammar in the report
that don&apos;t make sense

01:11:26.007 --> 01:11:28.019
and I don&apos;t understand it,
but I&apos;ll leave it with that.

01:11:28.019 --> 01:11:31.000
So I think there&apos;s some good stuff
in this report

01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:34.002
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll get you
to just finish up now, thank you,

01:11:34.002 --> 01:11:35.018
Councillor Wellington, thank you.

01:11:35.018 --> 01:11:38.011
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;ve got some
concerns, thank you.

01:11:38.011 --> 01:11:39.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Any other

01:11:39.023 --> 01:11:41.011
- Councillor Barker?

01:11:41.011 --> 01:11:42.023
CR PAUL BARKER: Thanks, Mayor.

01:11:42.023 --> 01:11:45.000
I still have an issue
with community vision.

01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:48.001
That states &quot;We will leave the Surf Coast
better than we found it&quot;.

01:11:48.001 --> 01:11:49.014
It&apos;s a subjective statement.

01:11:49.014 --> 01:11:51.017
To me,
better involves being fiscally sound,

01:11:51.017 --> 01:11:55.014
reducing debt, reducing rates, getting
out of programs that duplicate state

01:11:55.014 --> 01:11:58.016
or federal programs, such
as Indigenous reconciliation

01:11:58.016 --> 01:12:02.015
and climate alarmism programs,
and stop giving out financial grants left,

01:12:02.015 --> 01:12:06.004
right and centre that come
from ratepayers that include hundreds

01:12:06.004 --> 01:12:10.006
of families struggling so much that
they are needing food aid

01:12:10.006 --> 01:12:12.020
from Feed Me Surf Coast.

01:12:12.020 --> 01:12:17.012
In strategy 1 it outlines a future focus
to confirm Council&apos;s approach to the Voice

01:12:17.012 --> 01:12:19.014
to Parliament Referendum.

01:12:19.014 --> 01:12:21.003
Now, there&apos;s two issues with this.

01:12:21.003 --> 01:12:23.005
1, it&apos;s a federal matter.

01:12:23.005 --> 01:12:27.014
Why on earth should ratepayers be funding
anything that&apos;s a federal matter?

01:12:27.014 --> 01:12:31.021
2, I thought there weren&apos;t any racists
among us.

01:12:31.021 --> 01:12:36.013
To even consider that one might support
such a referendum that divides people

01:12:36.013 --> 01:12:41.017
on race is in its very nature racist.

01:12:41.017 --> 01:12:45.010
To quote, it is &quot;wrong and unfair&quot;,

01:12:45.010 --> 01:12:47.014
dangerous and divisive&quot;,

01:12:47.014 --> 01:12:50.022
useless and costly&quot;, words
from Indigenous Australian

01:12:50.022 --> 01:12:52.010
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price.

01:12:54.014 --> 01:12:59.012
A key progress item
in strategy 4 describes informing advocacy

01:12:59.012 --> 01:13:01.021
Now, what does that really mean?

01:13:01.021 --> 01:13:04.003
It means we&apos;re involved
in delivering services

01:13:04.003 --> 01:13:08.007
to the community that we can&apos;t afford
and need to ask for taxpayer-funded

01:13:08.007 --> 01:13:11.012
handouts from State
and Federal Governments.

01:13:11.012 --> 01:13:14.024
Now, I don&apos;t know about you,
but I don&apos;t want taxpayers

01:13:14.024 --> 01:13:19.019
from Bairnsdale or Sydney paying
for services in the Surf Coast.

01:13:19.019 --> 01:13:21.016
If we can afford it, we should run it.

01:13:21.016 --> 01:13:24.008
If we can&apos;t, we should get out of it.

01:13:24.008 --> 01:13:30.000
I don&apos;t think it&apos;s particularly fair
to throw out our costs on to others that

01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:33.020
will likely never see the benefit.

01:13:33.020 --> 01:13:37.024
An element that is okay to see
is the review of volunteering programs

01:13:37.024 --> 01:13:41.005
as part of this,
but should Council really be getting

01:13:41.005 --> 01:13:44.009
involved in volunteering programs?

01:13:44.009 --> 01:13:47.006
Personally, I think governments
of any level should just get

01:13:47.006 --> 01:13:50.009
out of the way
of community interacting cooperatively

01:13:50.009 --> 01:13:52.003
with each other.

01:13:52.003 --> 01:13:55.023
And in regards to housing, it seems to me
to be quite simple.

01:13:55.023 --> 01:13:59.011
Reduce the barriers to a wider range
of housing options being built,

01:13:59.011 --> 01:14:03.021
or accept that housing affordability
is going to be a continual problem

01:14:03.021 --> 01:14:08.012
and continue to get worse
and unless you remove the barriers,

01:14:08.012 --> 01:14:13.006
do not expect any sort of relief
in housing affordability in the Surf Coast

01:14:16.018 --> 01:14:18.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:14:18.005 --> 01:14:20.000
Do any other Councillors wish to speak?

01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:22.005
Councillor Bodsworth?

01:14:22.005 --> 01:14:25.020
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: It&apos;s mostly been said
already, so I&apos;m just going to sort

01:14:25.020 --> 01:14:30.019
of echo my satisfaction
at the things that have been done so well.

01:14:30.019 --> 01:14:34.011
It&apos;s such a massive program and
on the whole, I think we&apos;re doing great.

01:14:34.011 --> 01:14:36.020
I do agree
with Councillor Wellington&apos;s comments

01:14:36.020 --> 01:14:41.020
about outcomes reporting
and I know we have lots of data sets

01:14:41.020 --> 01:14:46.018
around outcomes in sort of layers
beneath what we&apos;ve been shown

01:14:46.018 --> 01:14:48.005
in this report

01:14:48.005 --> 01:14:50.008
- for example,
on the Karaaf water monitoring

01:14:50.008 --> 01:14:57.011
- so I&apos;m sure there&apos;s a way for us
to provide opportunities for community

01:14:57.011 --> 01:15:00.008
to delve deeper and get
into those data sets

01:15:00.008 --> 01:15:05.007
and see what they&apos;re saying about issues
of particular importance to them.

01:15:05.007 --> 01:15:11.006
The only one I&apos;d like to highlight
is where we initially

01:15:11.006 --> 01:15:13.023
in error said that the
pathway strategy was complete

01:15:13.023 --> 01:15:18.002
and we&apos;ve said now,
we&apos;ve clarified that it&apos;s not and

01:15:18.002 --> 01:15:22.014
for me that&apos;s a huge piece
of work that I think we&apos;ve made some good

01:15:22.014 --> 01:15:26.016
progress on pathways, but we&apos;re nowhere
near where we&apos;d like to be.

01:15:26.016 --> 01:15:30.003
And we&apos;ve seen
through the youth census last year

01:15:30.003 --> 01:15:35.014
through the Moriac Structure Plan how
important pathways are in those contexts.

01:15:35.014 --> 01:15:40.005
We&apos;ve seen how important pathways are
to the Winchelsea community.

01:15:40.005 --> 01:15:42.011
They&apos;re an essential part
of Torquay&apos;s future,

01:15:42.011 --> 01:15:46.020
particularly the arterial-sized
pathways that Torquay needs

01:15:46.020 --> 01:15:50.015
to link town centres
and residential neighbourhoods

01:15:50.015 --> 01:15:54.011
and major community facilities
like schools.

01:15:54.011 --> 01:15:58.003
Business Anglesea has presented
a fantastic vision for pathways,

01:15:58.003 --> 01:16:02.011
pedestrian bicycle connections
in Anglesea, which serve locals

01:16:02.011 --> 01:16:03.024
as well as visitors.

01:16:03.024 --> 01:16:07.008
So everywhere you look
and you could probably look

01:16:07.008 --> 01:16:09.023
at almost every strategy
in our Council plan

01:16:09.023 --> 01:16:12.004
and pathways are relevant to that.

01:16:12.004 --> 01:16:15.011
So I&apos;m not confident that rolling
the pathway strategy in

01:16:15.011 --> 01:16:20.018
with the social infrastructure plan,
which is a huge piece of work,

01:16:20.018 --> 01:16:25.013
a very ambitious and difficult piece
of work to deliver, is the right way

01:16:25.013 --> 01:16:27.001
to go.

01:16:27.001 --> 01:16:30.019
I don&apos;t think we&apos;ve discussed that enough
and I do think we need

01:16:30.019 --> 01:16:36.015
to really put together a strategy
to deliver to get into our strategy,

01:16:36.015 --> 01:16:40.005
which sounds horribly bureaucratic,
but I just think we&apos;ve got to get to grips

01:16:40.005 --> 01:16:44.003
with how we move forward on pathways.

01:16:44.003 --> 01:16:46.014
But all in all, thanks for your comments,
everyone.

01:16:48.015 --> 01:16:50.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:16:50.002 --> 01:16:51.017
Did you have any summing comments?

01:16:51.017 --> 01:16:54.004
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Oh, look,
just very quickly, just

01:16:54.004 --> 01:16:59.023
to acknowledge that the Council plan
encompasses a huge suite

01:16:59.023 --> 01:17:05.016
of work strategies, goals and actions
and I think at this point

01:17:05.016 --> 01:17:10.010
in time it&apos;s reasonable to say that not
all of it will be achievable

01:17:10.010 --> 01:17:14.005
in this Council term
and I understand that officers are doing

01:17:14.005 --> 01:17:19.017
a lot of work at the moment and previously
to really look

01:17:19.017 --> 01:17:25.018
at what the key priorities are and
to ensure that teams are focusing

01:17:25.018 --> 01:17:27.024
on the right things
over the next 18 months

01:17:27.024 --> 01:17:31.019
to achieve those things in the Council
plan that are most important.

01:17:31.019 --> 01:17:35.022
So at this point the recommendation
is just to note the report

01:17:35.022 --> 01:17:38.009
and I&apos;m sure that we&apos;re all able
to do that.

01:17:38.009 --> 01:17:40.002
So thank you.

01:17:40.002 --> 01:17:43.022
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: All those in favour.

01:17:43.022 --> 01:17:45.009
And the motion is carried.

01:17:49.008 --> 01:17:52.002
We now move on
to the Surf Coast Shire cat curfew.

01:17:54.010 --> 01:17:57.004
The purpose of this report is
to seek Council&apos;s endorsement

01:17:57.004 --> 01:18:00.005
of an updated cat confinement order
which would require all cats

01:18:00.005 --> 01:18:05.000
within the municipality to be confined at
all times to the owner&apos;s property unless

01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:06.022
the cat is appropriately restrained.

01:18:06.022 --> 01:18:10.014
I note that officers have an updated
recommendation that is going to be put

01:18:10.014 --> 01:18:17.018
onto the screen as there is a minor change
to that proposed order.

01:18:17.018 --> 01:18:20.012
Thank you, Jake.

01:18:20.012 --> 01:18:25.011
So we can see there that
the recommendation is

01:18:25.011 --> 01:18:29.008
&quot;That Council adopts the revised
cat confinement order, subject

01:18:29.008 --> 01:18:34.001
to that part 2.1 of the Order
at attachment 1 be amended so that

01:18:34.001 --> 01:18:40.003
the word &apos;property&apos; be replaced
with the word &apos;premises&apos;&quot;,

01:18:40.003 --> 01:18:43.022
and then the rest of the recommendation
is the same.

01:18:43.022 --> 01:18:45.014
Do I have a mover of the motion?

01:18:45.014 --> 01:18:47.002
CR ROSE HODGE: I&apos;m happy to move.

01:18:47.002 --> 01:18:48.022
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Hodge.

01:18:48.022 --> 01:18:50.009
Is that as per the

01:18:50.009 --> 01:18:51.022
- CR ROSE HODGE: Yes.

01:18:51.022 --> 01:18:53.013
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And a seconder?

01:18:53.013 --> 01:18:55.000
Councillor Bodsworth.

01:18:55.000 --> 01:18:56.013
Do you wish to speak?

01:18:56.013 --> 01:18:58.000
CR ROSE HODGE: As a cat owner

01:18:58.000 --> 01:19:00.003
- I don&apos;t know
if there&apos;s many other cat owners

01:19:00.003 --> 01:19:03.010
on the Council, but I&apos;ve had Roy
for 18 years and he&apos;s slowing down a bit,

01:19:03.010 --> 01:19:06.006
but all about cat curfews is
about responsible pet ownership

01:19:06.006 --> 01:19:10.003
and that includes that your cats are safe
and not roaming from their home.

01:19:10.003 --> 01:19:15.004
And owners should be very conscious
of the way cats behave and of course

01:19:15.004 --> 01:19:17.002
of their neighbours&apos; amenity as well.

01:19:17.002 --> 01:19:21.017
Surf Coast Shire has had a night curfew
for quite a while and now,

01:19:21.017 --> 01:19:26.009
if this recommendation is passed,
it will be including daytime.

01:19:26.009 --> 01:19:30.011
Cats should be on their own property
as well as dogs are requested to do so

01:19:30.011 --> 01:19:31.023
as well.

01:19:31.023 --> 01:19:35.013
This recommendation does not force
cats into enclosures, but the onus is

01:19:35.013 --> 01:19:39.000
on the owner to try
and ensure that their felines are

01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:40.012
on their property.

01:19:40.012 --> 01:19:43.024
If not, penalties could occur,
just as dogs are too.

01:19:43.024 --> 01:19:50.009
Out of our survey, 76% of cat owners
in our survey kept their cats already 24

01:19:50.009 --> 01:19:57.007
hours on their property and the other
over 130 cat owners said it would take

01:19:57.007 --> 01:20:00.004
them nearly two years to try
to achieve what

01:20:00.004 --> 01:20:02.007
they think enclosure would mean.

01:20:02.007 --> 01:20:05.018
What we will be doing, there
will be a six-month transition period

01:20:05.018 --> 01:20:11.005
and the 924 registered cat owners,
we&apos;ll be sending communication

01:20:11.005 --> 01:20:16.005
to them detailing changes
and the best ways any modifications

01:20:16.005 --> 01:20:18.006
could be completed.

01:20:18.006 --> 01:20:22.007
These recommendations
by some cat owners go too far

01:20:22.007 --> 01:20:25.012
and we&apos;ve heard from environmentalists
that these recommendations

01:20:25.012 --> 01:20:28.001
to protect wildlife don&apos;t go far enough.

01:20:28.001 --> 01:20:30.005
So I think we&apos;re in the balance.

01:20:30.005 --> 01:20:34.019
So the data that we look
at in the future could,

01:20:34.019 --> 01:20:39.013
when we do our domestic animal
management plan again, review this.

01:20:39.013 --> 01:20:43.015
But I call on cat owners to try
to keep their cats in.

01:20:43.015 --> 01:20:50.008
We know there&apos;s a large kill on bird life
and wildlife and I think those 924 owners

01:20:50.008 --> 01:20:54.008
will read the recommendations, look at how
they can improve the situations

01:20:54.008 --> 01:20:58.018
at their homes and keep their cats safe
and the environment safe as well.

01:20:58.018 --> 01:21:00.005
Thank you.

01:21:00.005 --> 01:21:01.018
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:21:01.018 --> 01:21:03.021
Councillor Bodsworth, did you wish
to speak?

01:21:03.021 --> 01:21:05.016
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Yes, please, Mayor.

01:21:05.016 --> 01:21:09.005
I just want to talk about the why
of this proposal briefly,

01:21:09.005 --> 01:21:12.020
given Councillor Hodge has covered things
well.

01:21:12.020 --> 01:21:18.012
In preparing for our decision making
on this tonight, in addition to referring

01:21:18.012 --> 01:21:25.022
to our own report, I&apos;ve referred
to the 2021 federal parliamentary inquiry

01:21:25.022 --> 01:21:31.001
into this issue and I&apos;m just going to pass
on a few interesting findings

01:21:31.001 --> 01:21:33.011
from that that I think are relevant
to our decision.

01:21:33.011 --> 01:21:37.017
It found that cats kill almost 2 billion
native animals per year.

01:21:37.017 --> 01:21:43.006
Roaming pet cats are estimated
to kill 390 million native animals per

01:21:43.006 --> 01:21:44.018
year.

01:21:44.018 --> 01:21:49.016
An individual roaming pet cat kills 186
animals per year on average,

01:21:49.016 --> 01:21:52.015
60% of which are native.

01:21:52.015 --> 01:21:59.003
39% of cats brought in at night sneak out
to roam and hunt during the night.

01:21:59.003 --> 01:22:03.022
Pet cats bring home only 15% of what
they hunt.

01:22:03.022 --> 01:22:09.013
Pet cats&apos; average lifespan is three
to four times longer when they&apos;re confined

01:22:09.013 --> 01:22:15.019
They also suffer a lot less injuries
through fights with other animals

01:22:15.019 --> 01:22:17.023
and being hit by cars, and things
like that.

01:22:20.002 --> 01:22:24.009
So the federal inquiry
recommended cat registration,

01:22:24.009 --> 01:22:28.019
sterilisation incentives,
education campaigns and full-time

01:22:28.019 --> 01:22:30.007
confinement.

01:22:30.007 --> 01:22:34.003
So out of those things,
we have compulsory cat registration,

01:22:34.003 --> 01:22:38.017
we have sterilisation incentives,
we have an education campaign which

01:22:38.017 --> 01:22:44.024
is outlined in this report, and hopefully,
if we all vote the way I&apos;m intending

01:22:44.024 --> 01:22:48.024
to vote on this, we&apos;ll bring in full-time
confinement.

01:22:48.024 --> 01:22:52.018
There is a question about
whether that goes far enough in my mind,

01:22:52.018 --> 01:22:55.015
given particularly
with rural areas we can be talking

01:22:55.015 --> 01:22:59.003
about quite large properties
with really high conservation values

01:22:59.003 --> 01:23:04.003
where cats will be still allowed
to roam those properties.

01:23:04.003 --> 01:23:08.004
However, I believe that most owners
of those properties won&apos;t be inclined

01:23:08.004 --> 01:23:10.019
to leave cats to roam in that way.

01:23:10.019 --> 01:23:13.019
So I&apos;m fairly confident that
they would be quite small numbers

01:23:13.019 --> 01:23:16.008
in the scheme of things.

01:23:16.008 --> 01:23:20.016
And it&apos;s worth noting in relation
to a night-time curfew that keeping cats

01:23:20.016 --> 01:23:26.015
in at night changes the species they kill,
not the number of animals, so birds

01:23:26.015 --> 01:23:30.019
and reptiles in the daytime, mammals
at night.

01:23:30.019 --> 01:23:33.023
So, yeah, I&apos;m very much in favour
of this recommendation.

01:23:33.023 --> 01:23:36.022
I&apos;m a dog lover,
but that means I&apos;m a pet lover

01:23:36.022 --> 01:23:42.004
and I understand how attached we all get
to our pets and I understand that equally

01:23:42.004 --> 01:23:44.006
with cat owners as with dog owners.

01:23:44.006 --> 01:23:47.018
So thanks to everyone in the community
for their great input on this

01:23:47.018 --> 01:23:52.010
and I hope we vote this recommendation in.

01:23:52.010 --> 01:23:53.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:23:53.023 --> 01:23:55.015
Any other Councillors wish to speak?

01:23:55.015 --> 01:23:57.002
Councillor Barker?

01:23:57.002 --> 01:24:00.000
CR PAUL BARKER: Do I appreciate
what this curfew intends to do?

01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:01.012
Sure.

01:24:01.012 --> 01:24:03.015
But the method is ludicrous.

01:24:03.015 --> 01:24:07.015
Rules are only useful if they are easy
to police.

01:24:07.015 --> 01:24:11.008
I see this being largely an impossible
rule to enforce.

01:24:11.008 --> 01:24:15.008
Sure there will be some instances where
the rules will be able to be used

01:24:15.008 --> 01:24:18.022
and penalties applied to offenders,
but I&apos;m concerned that there are

01:24:18.022 --> 01:24:24.000
going to be countless hours
of officer time spent policing these rules

01:24:24.000 --> 01:24:27.006
that will result in nothing.

01:24:27.006 --> 01:24:32.002
Now, will that cost us hundreds,
thousands, tens of thousands of dollars,

01:24:32.002 --> 01:24:33.021
maybe more?

01:24:33.021 --> 01:24:36.013
Only time will tell.

01:24:36.013 --> 01:24:40.023
When I articulate my concern
with the direction Council is heading,

01:24:40.023 --> 01:24:45.007
often driven by an agenda straight
out of the Labor and Greens&apos; playbook,

01:24:45.007 --> 01:24:50.008
it is the same as the Liberal playbook,
authoritarian.

01:24:50.008 --> 01:24:51.021
Now, what is authoritarian?

01:24:54.003 --> 01:25:01.004
That is favouring or enforcing strict
obedience to authority at the expense

01:25:01.004 --> 01:25:03.024
of personal freedom.

01:25:03.024 --> 01:25:07.021
Now, in this case it&apos;s restricting freedom
for cats to roam and, as I mentioned

01:25:07.021 --> 01:25:12.000
before, that&apos;s an intent I can appreciate,
but the method proposed here will come

01:25:12.000 --> 01:25:14.020
at a cost that I cannot support.

01:25:14.020 --> 01:25:18.000
What I do find some humour in is that cats
will be permitted

01:25:18.000 --> 01:25:23.003
to leave their owner&apos;s property or
premises in a reasonable means

01:25:23.003 --> 01:25:25.004
of restraint.

01:25:25.004 --> 01:25:27.018
I look forward
to the burgeoning Surf Coast cat harness

01:25:27.018 --> 01:25:30.014
market growing
at a faster rate than our established

01:25:30.014 --> 01:25:33.001
public dog dropping trend.

01:25:33.001 --> 01:25:36.011
Maybe we should ban public dog droppings
or put a curfew on them.

01:25:36.011 --> 01:25:37.024
That will clean up our pathways.

01:25:40.020 --> 01:25:42.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:25:42.007 --> 01:25:44.002
Do any other Councillors wish to speak?

01:25:44.002 --> 01:25:45.015
Councillor Wellington.

01:25:45.015 --> 01:25:47.014
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you very much

01:25:47.014 --> 01:25:49.001
Yes, I am a cat owner.

01:25:49.001 --> 01:25:51.003
We have two cats
and I&apos;ve had cats all my life.

01:25:51.003 --> 01:25:55.013
I&apos;m also a horse lover and I won&apos;t attempt
to use the sophisticated word (inaudible)

01:25:55.013 --> 01:25:59.021
but I&apos;m a horse rider and a horse lover,
so none of that is really relevant

01:25:59.021 --> 01:26:02.015
to what I think about this proposal.

01:26:06.005 --> 01:26:13.021
I do think that the threat that cats pose
to our native wildlife is just enormous.

01:26:13.021 --> 01:26:19.008
I&apos;ve been a very big proponent
of having curfews for cats.

01:26:19.008 --> 01:26:28.015
The times that cats tend to roam and kill
is evenings and mornings, so we

01:26:28.015 --> 01:26:31.023
and probably a lot of other farmers,
I imagine, definitely lock our cats

01:26:31.023 --> 01:26:35.015
up early in the evening, keep them locked
up all night.

01:26:35.015 --> 01:26:40.005
I&apos;m just looking out the window
at my 100 acre property and I think

01:26:40.005 --> 01:26:43.013
if my cats are allowed
to roam in a 100 acre property at night,

01:26:43.013 --> 01:26:46.014
you know,
we&apos;ve spent years planting very

01:26:46.014 --> 01:26:51.022
significant plantations of native trees
and we really value and cherish the birds

01:26:51.022 --> 01:26:55.001
that come to them
and our cats are not permitted

01:26:55.001 --> 01:26:58.023
near the plantations at all
and certainly not at the time when

01:26:58.023 --> 01:27:02.007
they would be most actively seeking
to kill, which is, as I understand it,

01:27:02.007 --> 01:27:03.020
evenings and early mornings.

01:27:03.020 --> 01:27:09.002
So I&apos;m pretty disappointed that this
regulation won&apos;t stop people like me,

01:27:09.002 --> 01:27:13.005
if we chose to, allowing our cats
to roam any time of the day or night

01:27:13.005 --> 01:27:15.000
over properties that might span

01:27:15.000 --> 01:27:19.000
- you know, my property is 100 acres,
but others may span thousands of acres,

01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:24.021
and I&apos;m told that property means all
of your property that you own and work on,

01:27:24.021 --> 01:27:26.024
not just the sort of title that you live
on.

01:27:26.024 --> 01:27:29.003
So a lot
of these farming properties are made up

01:27:29.003 --> 01:27:32.022
of multiple titles and the cats
will be allowed to roam across all

01:27:32.022 --> 01:27:34.009
of them.

01:27:34.009 --> 01:27:38.004
So I&apos;m disappointed at the scope of this,
but I think the intent is there

01:27:38.004 --> 01:27:39.017
and I think it is

01:27:39.017 --> 01:27:43.005
- and most people want to comply
with the law, so most people

01:27:43.005 --> 01:27:45.021
will recognise they need to do this
and they&apos;ll do it.

01:27:45.021 --> 01:27:51.006
I can&apos;t see our rangers running around
with nets and headlights trying

01:27:51.006 --> 01:27:54.024
to find cats in the middle of the night,
but it will allow neighbours who are being

01:27:54.024 --> 01:27:57.005
bothered by cats crossing
into their backyards

01:27:57.005 --> 01:28:00.022
and soiling or terrorising their dogs,
or whatever they do,

01:28:00.022 --> 01:28:04.002
they can make a complaint and things
will be able to be done about that.

01:28:04.002 --> 01:28:05.015
So I think it&apos;s part of the way.

01:28:05.015 --> 01:28:07.002
I will support it.

01:28:07.002 --> 01:28:09.000
I&apos;m disappointed in its scope.

01:28:09.000 --> 01:28:12.003
I hope that rural people,
and I think rural people generally would

01:28:12.003 --> 01:28:15.017
be really responsible cat owners
because the biggest environmental

01:28:15.017 --> 01:28:21.019
- people should understand,
I would say the most important

01:28:21.019 --> 01:28:24.001
environmentalists
in this shire are the members

01:28:24.001 --> 01:28:25.013
of the farming community.

01:28:25.013 --> 01:28:29.002
They are looking after the land in a way
that others just couldn&apos;t understand

01:28:29.002 --> 01:28:30.016
and the wildlife.

01:28:30.016 --> 01:28:33.015
So I will support it,
but I&apos;m a bit disappointed at it.

01:28:33.015 --> 01:28:35.002
Thank you.

01:28:35.002 --> 01:28:36.015
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:28:36.015 --> 01:28:39.002
Did you have any closing comments,
Councillor Hodge?

01:28:39.002 --> 01:28:42.006
CR ROSE HODGE: Oh, just to say I do agree
with Councillor Wellington,

01:28:42.006 --> 01:28:45.012
I don&apos;t see our rangers going out
on cat hunts and wasting time on that.

01:28:45.012 --> 01:28:48.006
It will be more of a reactive one,
especially for neighbours

01:28:48.006 --> 01:28:51.007
if they&apos;ve got a problem cat
and our rangers then have the power

01:28:51.007 --> 01:28:54.011
to make their amenity better.

01:28:54.011 --> 01:29:00.022
I accept this report and
in several years it gets reviewed again,

01:29:00.022 --> 01:29:03.024
so there could be more data collected
over the next couple of years

01:29:03.024 --> 01:29:06.015
and we&apos;ll see how it is.

01:29:06.015 --> 01:29:09.007
So I recommend this report
and hopefully it gets through.

01:29:09.007 --> 01:29:10.020
Thank you.

01:29:10.020 --> 01:29:12.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:29:12.007 --> 01:29:13.020
We&apos;ll now put it to the vote.

01:29:13.020 --> 01:29:15.007
All those in favour.

01:29:15.007 --> 01:29:16.020
All those opposed.

01:29:16.020 --> 01:29:18.007
And the motion is carried.

01:29:21.020 --> 01:29:26.006
We now move on to item 4.4, Bi-Annual
Customer Experience Report July

01:29:26.006 --> 01:29:28.005
to December 2022.

01:29:28.005 --> 01:29:30.010
The item presents Council
with a the Bi-Annual

01:29:30.010 --> 01:29:32.013
Customer Experience Report.

01:29:32.013 --> 01:29:36.000
Do we have a mover?

01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:37.012
Councillor Bodsworth.

01:29:37.012 --> 01:29:39.000
Is it as per the recommendation?

01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:40.020
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Yes, thanks, Mayor.

01:29:40.020 --> 01:29:43.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And do we have
a seconder, please?

01:29:43.007 --> 01:29:44.020
Councillor Gazzard, thank you.

01:29:44.020 --> 01:29:46.023
Did you want to speak,
Councillor Bodsworth?

01:29:46.023 --> 01:29:48.010
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Thanks.

01:29:48.010 --> 01:29:49.023
Look, I&apos;ll keep it brief.

01:29:49.023 --> 01:29:52.000
This is a recommendation
to note the report.

01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:57.000
I think the beauty of these reports
is that they provide transparency

01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:01.016
to community
on the things their fellow citizens

01:30:01.016 --> 01:30:04.011
believe we&apos;re doing well or we&apos;re not
doing well.

01:30:04.011 --> 01:30:12.005
It provides our officers and ourselves
as Councillors with a good way of working

01:30:12.005 --> 01:30:15.000
out the things that we&apos;re doing well
and not doing well,

01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:16.018
so I think it&apos;s absolutely essential.

01:30:16.018 --> 01:30:20.007
It&apos;s also mandated
through the Local Government Act now,

01:30:20.007 --> 01:30:22.002
which is a good thing.

01:30:22.002 --> 01:30:25.010
There are a whole lot
of different metrics that are expressed

01:30:25.010 --> 01:30:27.010
in this report.

01:30:27.010 --> 01:30:31.010
There are a lot of different channels
for people to either complain or

01:30:31.010 --> 01:30:34.004
to compliment us.

01:30:34.004 --> 01:30:39.022
I note that new waste contracts,
which we voted on a while back,

01:30:39.022 --> 01:30:46.015
kerb side waste contracts that include
constant GPS monitoring of trucks

01:30:46.015 --> 01:30:52.018
and a lot of camera monitoring should make
a difference to waste-related complaints,

01:30:52.018 --> 01:30:56.006
which are quite a large percentage
of the complaints.

01:30:56.006 --> 01:31:03.002
I also note the impact of La Nina,
basically simultaneously La Nina weather

01:31:03.002 --> 01:31:08.000
patterns with extraordinary rainfall
and wind, COVID

01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:15.005
and other unusual circumstances
which are visible in this report and I&apos;d

01:31:15.005 --> 01:31:18.013
like to thank the community
for their understanding and patience

01:31:18.013 --> 01:31:23.016
through that period when we&apos;ve struggled
to keep up with our responsibilities

01:31:23.016 --> 01:31:29.018
and I&apos;d particularly like
to thank Council staff for their hard work

01:31:29.018 --> 01:31:35.003
over a relentlessly long period
maintaining good levels of service.

01:31:35.003 --> 01:31:40.011
So as this report notes, there are lots
of things that we need to keep trying

01:31:40.011 --> 01:31:43.001
to improve, lots
of things that we&apos;re doing really,

01:31:43.001 --> 01:31:47.006
really well, but the most important thing
of all is that we have this program

01:31:47.006 --> 01:31:50.023
which guides us in those improvements.

01:31:50.023 --> 01:31:52.011
Thanks.

01:31:52.011 --> 01:31:53.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:31:53.023 --> 01:31:55.011
Councillor Gazzard?

01:31:55.011 --> 01:31:56.023
Would anyone else like to speak?

01:31:56.023 --> 01:31:58.011
Councillor Allen?

01:31:58.011 --> 01:31:59.023
CR GARY ALLEN: Thanks, Mayor.

01:31:59.023 --> 01:32:03.008
Look, I continue to be surprised
at the lowish number of residents who use

01:32:03.008 --> 01:32:05.014
the customer request management system.

01:32:05.014 --> 01:32:10.007
In the past two years being a Councillor,
I regard this to be the most effective way

01:32:10.007 --> 01:32:15.000
to ensure that a resident request or
complaint is followed up in the system.

01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:18.018
In any system there will always be faults
and some requests complaints may not be

01:32:18.018 --> 01:32:21.004
answered in an acceptable timeframe.

01:32:21.004 --> 01:32:26.001
These, I believe, are very few and
if this occurs, the customer has a record

01:32:26.001 --> 01:32:29.013
to then make a follow-up complaint.

01:32:29.013 --> 01:32:33.014
Look, I appreciate that I may get
the nickname of polypharma

01:32:33.014 --> 01:32:39.005
as the Lorne ward residents believe
that I am handballing their concerns.

01:32:39.005 --> 01:32:42.022
However, I&apos;m a convert and I wish
to take this opportunity

01:32:42.022 --> 01:32:45.002
of promoting the system.

01:32:45.002 --> 01:32:47.022
Customers,
you receive a unique reference number

01:32:47.022 --> 01:32:50.017
and information on when you
will receive a response

01:32:50.017 --> 01:32:53.016
from the relevant action officer.

01:32:53.016 --> 01:32:57.008
The Council is committed
to completing both customer requests

01:32:57.008 --> 01:33:01.012
and complaints within the timeframe and
as you can see from this report,

01:33:01.012 --> 01:33:07.012
the Council measures the completion rate
of requests within the timeframe.

01:33:07.012 --> 01:33:09.000
Thank you.

01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:10.012
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:33:10.012 --> 01:33:12.001
Councillor Wellington.

01:33:12.001 --> 01:33:13.024
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thanks very much.

01:33:13.024 --> 01:33:17.000
As I&apos;ve said numerous times, complaints
is an opportunity,

01:33:17.000 --> 01:33:20.007
so we definitely should welcome them.

01:33:20.007 --> 01:33:23.009
As I have said previously as well,
I&apos;m just really surprised

01:33:23.009 --> 01:33:26.003
at the low number requiring investigation.

01:33:26.003 --> 01:33:28.023
I do think a lot of complaints are dealt
with very quickly

01:33:28.023 --> 01:33:33.013
and addressed really well, but I also

01:33:33.013 --> 01:33:37.007
- I don&apos;t know how anyone can be
a Councillor on the shire and not walk

01:33:37.007 --> 01:33:41.011
down the street of their town
in areas where people know them

01:33:41.011 --> 01:33:46.008
and not be inundated with complaints,
because that&apos;s what I get and I&apos;m sure

01:33:46.008 --> 01:33:51.011
if others do that walking down the street,
they must get people coming up complaining

01:33:51.011 --> 01:33:52.024
about different things.

01:33:52.024 --> 01:33:56.008
Now, for whatever reason, some
of those things are requests for service,

01:33:56.008 --> 01:33:58.000
but others are complaints about

01:33:58.000 --> 01:34:02.013
- you know, the mud hut in Winchelsea,
I can tell you I&apos;ve had probably,

01:34:02.013 --> 01:34:06.001
I don&apos;t know, 100 complaints
about that in the last couple of months,

01:34:06.001 --> 01:34:10.000
few weeks,
about the engagement process there.

01:34:10.000 --> 01:34:15.000
If I look at the number
of complaints reported here, 27 upheld

01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:20.011
and 48 partially upheld, that means
in my ward,

01:34:20.011 --> 01:34:24.017
if Winchelsea ward had a relative
proportion of the complaints

01:34:24.017 --> 01:34:27.018
across the shire,
7 complaints would have been upheld

01:34:27.018 --> 01:34:29.020
and 12 closely upheld.

01:34:29.020 --> 01:34:32.003
I mean, it just doesn&apos;t accord
with my experience.

01:34:32.003 --> 01:34:34.011
So I think we have to try
to understand better what

01:34:34.011 --> 01:34:41.008
we&apos;re counting here and, you know,
how we can better capture the community

01:34:41.008 --> 01:34:42.021
feedback.

01:34:42.021 --> 01:34:45.023
We know from the customer experience,
the satisfaction survey,

01:34:45.023 --> 01:34:50.016
that overall satisfaction in the last
customer survey I think was 57%,

01:34:50.016 --> 01:34:55.019
so that means that 43% aren&apos;t happy,
and I just don&apos;t believe that that only

01:34:55.019 --> 01:34:58.015
generates such a small number
of complaints

01:34:58.015 --> 01:35:01.017
and certainly my experience
people aren&apos;t complaining, it&apos;s just

01:35:01.017 --> 01:35:05.010
about where they complain and how
they frame their complaints as to

01:35:05.010 --> 01:35:07.010
whether they&apos;re counted.

01:35:07.010 --> 01:35:09.006
So it&apos;s good to have the data presented.

01:35:09.006 --> 01:35:13.011
I do believe complaints is an opportunity
and as an organisation, we need

01:35:13.011 --> 01:35:17.022
to be measuring our complaints
and analysing them and trying to work

01:35:17.022 --> 01:35:19.009
out where they&apos;re coming from.

01:35:19.009 --> 01:35:20.023
I&apos;d like to see us respond to them.

01:35:20.023 --> 01:35:25.018
I&apos;ve said for many years satisfaction,
which is sort of a reflection

01:35:25.018 --> 01:35:30.023
of complaints, in the Winchelsea ward
on unsealed roads has generally been

01:35:30.023 --> 01:35:33.011
around 30 to 40%
and it&apos;s been highlighted

01:35:33.011 --> 01:35:37.003
in the satisfaction surveys every year for
as many years as I can remember,

01:35:37.003 --> 01:35:43.022
but it&apos;s never rated
to get its own strategy,

01:35:43.022 --> 01:35:46.014
(inaudible) more money
into the strategy which was good.

01:35:46.014 --> 01:35:48.001
But it&apos;s not

01:35:48.001 --> 01:35:49.020
- so I just think there&apos;s a problem

01:35:49.020 --> 01:35:53.022
- not a problem, but this
is not the full picture

01:35:53.022 --> 01:35:59.017
and I think that we need to
over time develop a better understanding

01:35:59.017 --> 01:36:03.001
of the full picture and respond
to it appropriately through a strategy

01:36:03.001 --> 01:36:04.014
and our plan.

01:36:04.014 --> 01:36:06.001
Thank you.

01:36:06.001 --> 01:36:07.014
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:36:07.014 --> 01:36:09.009
CR PAUL BARKER: Just a question, Mayor.

01:36:09.009 --> 01:36:14.016
How many of the 515 missed bin reports did
we have evidence that a garbage truck did

01:36:14.016 --> 01:36:17.013
pass by the property
and the complainant just forgot

01:36:17.013 --> 01:36:19.022
to put the bins out?

01:36:19.022 --> 01:36:22.020
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I think that would
have to be take on notice

01:36:22.020 --> 01:36:26.008
because that&apos;s a very detailed,
specific question which I imagine officers

01:36:26.008 --> 01:36:27.021
don&apos;t have at hand.

01:36:27.021 --> 01:36:30.023
So that can be taken on notice
and we can endeavour to look into that,

01:36:30.023 --> 01:36:34.002
or it may not be possible to respond to,
but thanks for your question,

01:36:34.002 --> 01:36:35.015
Councillor Barker.

01:36:35.015 --> 01:36:38.000
CR PAUL BARKER: Because
if it&apos;s a significant cost,

01:36:38.000 --> 01:36:41.007
I want the rest of the community
to understand that people making bogus

01:36:41.007 --> 01:36:43.013
complaints do cost us.

01:36:43.013 --> 01:36:46.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: We&apos;ll take that
on notice, thanks.

01:36:46.002 --> 01:36:48.023
Councillor Bodsworth,
did you have any closing statements?

01:36:48.023 --> 01:36:50.010
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: No, thanks.

01:36:50.010 --> 01:36:51.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No.

01:36:51.023 --> 01:36:53.014
We&apos;ll now put the motion to the vote.

01:36:53.014 --> 01:36:55.001
All those in favour.

01:36:55.001 --> 01:36:56.014
And the motion is carried.

01:36:56.014 --> 01:36:59.005
We now move on to the Adoption
of Residential Nature Strip

01:36:59.005 --> 01:37:00.018
Policy and Guidelines.

01:37:00.018 --> 01:37:03.024
The purpose of this report is
to present the Residential Nature Strip

01:37:03.024 --> 01:37:06.006
Policy
and Residential Nature Strip Guidelines

01:37:06.006 --> 01:37:07.018
to Council for adoption.

01:37:07.018 --> 01:37:09.006
Do we have a mover of a motion?

01:37:09.006 --> 01:37:10.018
Councillor Gazzard.

01:37:10.018 --> 01:37:12.010
And a seconder?

01:37:12.010 --> 01:37:14.007
Councillor Stapleton.

01:37:14.007 --> 01:37:16.000
And is it as per the motion?

01:37:16.000 --> 01:37:24.023
CR KATE GAZZARD: Yes,
as per the recommendation, thanks, Mayor.

01:37:24.023 --> 01:37:28.002
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Can I ask
a question before we start, please?

01:37:28.002 --> 01:37:29.015
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes.

01:37:29.015 --> 01:37:32.018
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: There&apos;s a statement
within the guidelines

01:37:32.018 --> 01:37:35.022
of this that says it&apos;s not Council&apos;s
intention to require residents

01:37:35.022 --> 01:37:38.004
to retrospectively comply
with the guidelines.

01:37:38.004 --> 01:37:41.000
I&apos;m just wondering if somehow
in this we can incorporate that

01:37:41.000 --> 01:37:44.008
that presumably, if it&apos;s passed tonight,
refers to as of now.

01:37:44.008 --> 01:37:45.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: That&apos;s right.

01:37:45.023 --> 01:37:49.006
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I mean,
it&apos;s presumably not saying in the future

01:37:49.006 --> 01:37:53.001
if you don&apos;t (inaudible) the guidelines,
but you don&apos;t get caught, we&apos;re not going

01:37:53.001 --> 01:37:54.016
to make you do it retrospectively.

01:37:54.016 --> 01:37:57.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No,
it&apos;s my understanding that as

01:37:57.004 --> 01:37:59.017
of once the policy is passed,
anything that&apos;s already

01:37:59.017 --> 01:38:01.004
gravelled or doesn&apos;t comply

01:38:01.004 --> 01:38:04.011
- it&apos;s from now going forward that
you can&apos;t have gravel nature strips,

01:38:04.011 --> 01:38:06.015
et cetera.

01:38:06.015 --> 01:38:10.009
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Can I suggest that
the movers might consider that somehow

01:38:10.009 --> 01:38:15.013
that&apos;s incorporated in the recommendation
because otherwise it will create,

01:38:15.013 --> 01:38:17.002
I believe

01:38:17.002 --> 01:38:19.023
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Are you putting
forward an amendment or

01:38:19.023 --> 01:38:21.011
foreshadowing an amendment?

01:38:21.011 --> 01:38:24.004
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;m just suggesting
that the mover

01:38:24.004 --> 01:38:28.011
of the motion might consider incorporating
an amendment that says that

01:38:28.011 --> 01:38:30.015
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thanks
for that comment.

01:38:30.015 --> 01:38:32.020
We&apos;ll move on
and let Councillor Gazzard speak

01:38:32.020 --> 01:38:34.007
to the motion.

01:38:34.007 --> 01:38:35.020
CR KATE GAZZARD: Thank you.

01:38:35.020 --> 01:38:37.009
I will move the motion as it stands.

01:38:37.009 --> 01:38:41.012
I think in the communications that go out
to the public we could make it quite clear

01:38:41.012 --> 01:38:47.010
that the policy is in place now
and we&apos;re not enforcing it retrospectively

01:38:47.010 --> 01:38:50.019
in terms
of people who have certain nature strips

01:38:50.019 --> 01:38:57.004
having to change it, but if people
from now on do make any changes

01:38:57.004 --> 01:39:03.020
that aren&apos;t in keeping with the policy,
then there will be fines applied.

01:39:03.020 --> 01:39:09.007
So this nature strip policy feels
like it&apos;s been a long time coming.

01:39:09.007 --> 01:39:13.020
Thank you to the officers for
all the work that&apos;s been put in to this.

01:39:13.020 --> 01:39:19.018
It is something that we&apos;ve received quite
a lot of correspondence about

01:39:19.018 --> 01:39:24.020
and we&apos;ve compared with other Councils
who have existing nature strip

01:39:24.020 --> 01:39:28.007
policies and guidelines.

01:39:28.007 --> 01:39:31.005
I think it
is important that we have this policy

01:39:31.005 --> 01:39:33.024
and the guidelines for clarity.

01:39:33.024 --> 01:39:37.006
Nature strips are obviously Council-owned
land, but are managed

01:39:37.006 --> 01:39:39.021
by the property owners.

01:39:39.021 --> 01:39:44.021
They&apos;re a public space that can contribute
to the sense of place and community

01:39:44.021 --> 01:39:48.020
and really can be a pride
for neighbourhoods

01:39:48.020 --> 01:39:53.000
and certainly ours sometimes
is a little overgrown

01:39:53.000 --> 01:39:59.006
and our neighbour mows it for us,
so it&apos;s a real community feel.

01:39:59.006 --> 01:40:02.000
There&apos;s lots
of considerations in the making

01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:07.016
of this policy and I know a lot
of people feel very strongly that certain

01:40:07.016 --> 01:40:12.021
plants or grasses should be mandated,
whereas other people would

01:40:12.021 --> 01:40:18.010
like gravel or other materials.

01:40:18.010 --> 01:40:21.002
It&apos;s difficult
because there&apos;s a lot of considerations,

01:40:21.002 --> 01:40:24.001
different people have
different aesthetic appeals,

01:40:24.001 --> 01:40:32.015
and I guess the main things that we&apos;ve had
to contend with are safety in terms

01:40:32.015 --> 01:40:39.005
of road safety and pedestrian access,
that nature strips needs to be accessed

01:40:39.005 --> 01:40:44.005
for the amenities with gas and power
and rubbish bins.

01:40:48.002 --> 01:40:52.000
They play an active role
in our climate emergency response plan

01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:56.007
and also contribute towards a healthy
environment for people, plants

01:40:56.007 --> 01:40:57.020
and animals.

01:41:00.007 --> 01:41:04.022
The other things that we need
to be very aware of are bushfire risk

01:41:04.022 --> 01:41:14.001
and there are areas where the new rules
are difficult to enforce in certain parts

01:41:14.001 --> 01:41:17.004
of the shire and I acknowledge that
the hinterland

01:41:17.004 --> 01:41:23.004
and different areas in the coast do differ
in terms of vegetation and so while this

01:41:23.004 --> 01:41:27.019
is shire wide, we do have
to be somewhat flexible

01:41:27.019 --> 01:41:32.002
with the existing nature strips
that are in place.

01:41:32.002 --> 01:41:34.022
So I think the main thing
is that we&apos;re encouraging greening

01:41:34.022 --> 01:41:38.007
of the nature strips, so grass,
native plants that are less than

01:41:38.007 --> 01:41:43.010
50 centimetres tall,
and even edible gardens that can be

01:41:43.010 --> 01:41:46.019
a creative way
to decorate your nature strip.

01:41:46.019 --> 01:41:51.007
Gravel, concrete
and artificial turf are not allowed.

01:41:51.007 --> 01:41:55.016
Note that all trees are managed
by Council and so you can&apos;t plant new

01:41:55.016 --> 01:41:59.012
trees, but Council might be able
to plant a tree on your nature strip

01:41:59.012 --> 01:42:07.007
if it&apos;s deemed safe, and anything outside
of these guidelines requires a permit

01:42:07.007 --> 01:42:08.020
and if there&apos;s any

01:42:08.020 --> 01:42:11.002
- if there&apos;s no clarity,
then you can contact our

01:42:11.002 --> 01:42:12.018
development engineering team.

01:42:15.002 --> 01:42:20.014
So I think as a starting point,
having had no guideline

01:42:20.014 --> 01:42:27.019
and now this policy, I think it reads well
and is generally quite clear.

01:42:27.019 --> 01:42:33.000
We won&apos;t be forcing people
to change their existing nature strip,

01:42:33.000 --> 01:42:39.003
but I will note that as per VicRoads law,
it&apos;s illegal to park on your nature strip,

01:42:39.003 --> 01:42:44.018
so any of the gravel nature strips made
specifically for parking,

01:42:44.018 --> 01:42:48.024
actually that&apos;s not allowed in terms
of the road laws.

01:42:48.024 --> 01:42:53.001
So thank you to Council staff
and thank you to all the submissions

01:42:53.001 --> 01:42:57.007
and the community members who have been
contacting us about this issue

01:42:57.007 --> 01:43:02.016
and hopefully this provides some clarity.

01:43:02.016 --> 01:43:04.003
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:43:04.003 --> 01:43:05.016
Councillor Stapleton?

01:43:05.016 --> 01:43:07.006
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Thanks, Mayor.

01:43:07.006 --> 01:43:10.002
So as we all know, coming
from different parts of the shire,

01:43:10.002 --> 01:43:14.023
the character and type and role
of nature strips varies enormously

01:43:14.023 --> 01:43:16.016
across the shire.

01:43:16.016 --> 01:43:22.010
The thing I really like about this policy
is that it&apos;s a principles-based approach,

01:43:22.010 --> 01:43:25.018
which means that the policy
and the guidelines that come with it

01:43:25.018 --> 01:43:28.018
will help to provide Council officers
and the community

01:43:28.018 --> 01:43:32.010
with greater understanding of how nature
strips can be treated,

01:43:32.010 --> 01:43:36.009
whilst still allowing enough flexibility
to cater for the different needs

01:43:36.009 --> 01:43:39.022
that are inherent in each
of our townships.

01:43:39.022 --> 01:43:43.012
As a whole,
I think that nature strips should add to

01:43:43.012 --> 01:43:47.009
and not detract from streetscapes
and township character and hopefully add

01:43:47.009 --> 01:43:52.001
to a cooler and greener environment
and I&apos;m confident that these guidelines

01:43:52.001 --> 01:43:54.021
will help us to achieve that.

01:43:54.021 --> 01:44:00.020
Just acknowledging Councillor Wellington&apos;s
point about the retrospective application

01:44:00.020 --> 01:44:04.010
of the policy,
I&apos;m comfortable that in the guidelines

01:44:04.010 --> 01:44:08.005
under section 2, which
is policy application,

01:44:08.005 --> 01:44:14.006
I think it&apos;s pretty well covered with,
&quot;Council recognises that at the time

01:44:14.006 --> 01:44:17.002
of the adoption
of the Residential Nature Strip Policy

01:44:17.002 --> 01:44:22.000
and Guidelines there are many nature
strips through the shire where residents

01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:25.005
have undertaken works which do not comply
with the new guidelines.

01:44:25.005 --> 01:44:28.001
It is not Council&apos;s intention
to require residents

01:44:28.001 --> 01:44:29.014
to retrospectively comply&quot;.

01:44:29.014 --> 01:44:34.017
So I feel like that covers
off that concern adequately.

01:44:34.017 --> 01:44:37.016
And although the guidelines
will not require residents

01:44:37.016 --> 01:44:40.019
to retrospectively comply
with the new standards,

01:44:40.019 --> 01:44:44.019
I&apos;m really hopeful that
they provide an opportunity to educate

01:44:44.019 --> 01:44:49.003
and inspire our community
to create nature strips that contribute

01:44:49.003 --> 01:44:51.016
to a more sustainable environment.

01:44:51.016 --> 01:44:53.003
Thank you.

01:44:53.003 --> 01:44:54.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:44:54.016 --> 01:44:56.010
Do any other Councillors wish to speak?

01:44:56.010 --> 01:44:57.023
Councillor Bodsworth?

01:44:57.023 --> 01:44:59.013
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Thanks, Mayor.

01:44:59.013 --> 01:45:01.000
I agree.

01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:02.013
I think this

01:45:02.013 --> 01:45:04.013
- well,
we haven&apos;t had a nature strip policy

01:45:04.013 --> 01:45:07.013
before, so I think this
is a great first attempt.

01:45:07.013 --> 01:45:11.009
I think partly it&apos;s good because
of the input that we had from members

01:45:11.009 --> 01:45:17.010
of the public, so I&apos;d like to acknowledge
in some cases some quite fierce input

01:45:17.010 --> 01:45:21.010
from members
of the public which pressure tested our

01:45:21.010 --> 01:45:25.013
work while we were doing it
and I think has resulted in a

01:45:25.013 --> 01:45:27.001
better policy and guidelines.

01:45:29.005 --> 01:45:33.011
In addition
to the part that Councillor Stapleton

01:45:33.011 --> 01:45:36.011
highlighted in the policy application
in the guidelines,

01:45:36.011 --> 01:45:40.013
there&apos;s an important paragraph
around Council recognising that a

01:45:40.013 --> 01:45:42.023
&quot;historic lack
of a clear Nature Strip Policy

01:45:42.023 --> 01:45:46.004
and Guidelines has resulted
in widespread inappropriate

01:45:46.004 --> 01:45:49.012
and unsustainable uses and development
of nature strips&quot;.

01:45:49.012 --> 01:45:53.017
It goes on to say, &quot;With the Policy
and these Guidelines, Council aims

01:45:53.017 --> 01:45:58.024
to initiate a shift away from those uses
and towards more positive outcomes in line

01:45:58.024 --> 01:46:00.014
with the Policy Principles&quot;.

01:46:00.014 --> 01:46:03.012
So I think what is good about that
is that it highlights that this

01:46:03.012 --> 01:46:13.007
is not kind of a sudden revelatory change,
it&apos;s a shift,

01:46:13.007 --> 01:46:18.000
and it involves people getting to grips
with the policy principles

01:46:18.000 --> 01:46:22.022
and particularly the fact that nature
strips are public land and they&apos;re

01:46:22.022 --> 01:46:28.017
for public benefit and they&apos;re not
for exclusive private benefit.

01:46:28.017 --> 01:46:33.016
That paragraph I noted
is so important it&apos;s

01:46:33.016 --> 01:46:37.021
on the same page twice,
so we could probably get rid of one

01:46:37.021 --> 01:46:39.008
of those.

01:46:39.008 --> 01:46:42.017
But yeah, look, I think this
is really good.

01:46:42.017 --> 01:46:46.000
I think there&apos;s a review period
in several years&apos; time.

01:46:46.000 --> 01:46:49.016
I think that provides us a good
opportunity to incorporate feedback that

01:46:49.016 --> 01:46:54.008
we get as we put this to practice,
and yeah.

01:46:54.008 --> 01:46:57.007
So thanks to members
of the public who had their input

01:46:57.007 --> 01:47:02.000
and thanks to officers
for their good work on this.

01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:03.013
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:47:03.013 --> 01:47:05.000
Councillor Barker?

01:47:05.000 --> 01:47:06.019
CR PAUL BARKER: Just a quick question.

01:47:06.019 --> 01:47:09.001
What&apos;s it going to cost
to implement this policy?

01:47:11.013 --> 01:47:14.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll pass that on
to the CEO.

01:47:14.002 --> 01:47:17.000
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Thank you for the question,
Councillor Barker.

01:47:17.000 --> 01:47:18.023
We haven&apos;t quantified the direct cost.

01:47:18.023 --> 01:47:22.009
Part of the intention of the policy is
to try to make it as easy

01:47:22.009 --> 01:47:25.004
as possible where we&apos;re clear
around what&apos;s allowed

01:47:25.004 --> 01:47:30.017
and it&apos;s only really when it&apos;s outside
of that that residents

01:47:30.017 --> 01:47:35.012
and ratepayers should feel that they need
to come to us to seek a permit.

01:47:35.012 --> 01:47:41.013
So we&apos;re hoping that that means that it
will be fairly light touch in terms

01:47:41.013 --> 01:47:45.008
of the need for support
from Council officers and it

01:47:45.008 --> 01:47:50.018
will just be those occasional
opportunities where community members want

01:47:50.018 --> 01:47:54.012
to do something a bit different
on their nature strips that we would be

01:47:54.012 --> 01:47:56.009
involved.

01:47:56.009 --> 01:47:57.022
CR PAUL BARKER: Okay.

01:47:57.022 --> 01:47:59.009
Yes, you can start the clock.

01:47:59.009 --> 01:48:02.019
Principle 2 states that nature strips must
offer safety for pedestrians

01:48:02.019 --> 01:48:05.023
to prevent them from having to walk
on the road.

01:48:05.023 --> 01:48:11.019
We&apos;ve got hundreds of kilometres of roads
with nature strips that are not safe

01:48:11.019 --> 01:48:14.019
for walking on.

01:48:14.019 --> 01:48:18.009
I fear that we&apos;re backing ourselves
into a corner where we&apos;ll force ourselves

01:48:18.009 --> 01:48:21.008
to spend money that we don&apos;t have
on nature strips.

01:48:21.008 --> 01:48:24.014
Now,
I understand that there&apos;s some

01:48:24.014 --> 01:48:30.004
consideration because it&apos;s all not like
for like, but as I mentioned before

01:48:30.004 --> 01:48:34.001
about this direction Council has had
with the climate alarmism and got

01:48:34.001 --> 01:48:37.020
to green everything, it&apos;s going to come
at a cost.

01:48:40.018 --> 01:48:43.018
We&apos;re in a recession.

01:48:43.018 --> 01:48:47.008
It&apos;s like you&apos;ve got the blinkers on.

01:48:47.008 --> 01:48:50.005
We just can&apos;t be everything for everyone.

01:48:50.005 --> 01:48:54.004
I can understand the intent and desire
to clear things up,

01:48:54.004 --> 01:48:59.003
but I can&apos;t support it.

01:48:59.003 --> 01:49:01.024
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Allen,
did you wish to speak?

01:49:01.024 --> 01:49:06.016
CR GARY ALLEN: Yes, look, I think this
is an important and good start.

01:49:06.016 --> 01:49:10.003
Councillor Stapleton talked about most
of the things that I wanted to say,

01:49:10.003 --> 01:49:15.014
but I would like to stress that I accept
that it&apos;s a challenging issue

01:49:15.014 --> 01:49:20.020
with the difficulty of crafting a policy
that fits the differing locations

01:49:20.020 --> 01:49:25.022
within the shire,
the obvious one being topography,

01:49:25.022 --> 01:49:32.000
another heritage and character,
and I&apos;m quite confident not being

01:49:32.000 --> 01:49:35.017
retrospective that it will
in fact protect the tree canopy

01:49:35.017 --> 01:49:39.018
in Lorne which is so important
to the Lorne community.

01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:44.018
Thank you.

01:49:44.018 --> 01:49:46.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:49:46.005 --> 01:49:47.018
Councillor Gazzard

01:49:47.018 --> 01:49:50.003
- oh, Councillor Wellington,
did you wish to speak?

01:49:50.003 --> 01:49:51.023
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thanks so much.

01:49:51.023 --> 01:49:54.010
I&apos;d like to first of
all say I think this policy was kind

01:49:54.010 --> 01:49:57.019
of stimulated
by (inaudible), who are Torquay residents

01:49:57.019 --> 01:50:00.016
who were very concerned
about the gravelling and the sort

01:50:00.016 --> 01:50:05.000
of changing of nature strips
in North Torquay to make them impermeable,

01:50:05.000 --> 01:50:10.010
which obviously just adds
to the environmental risks and threats

01:50:10.010 --> 01:50:14.013
in that area and I think
they have pursued it really strongly and

01:50:14.013 --> 01:50:17.006
on behalf of the community, so I&apos;d really
like to thank them

01:50:17.006 --> 01:50:18.019
for what they&apos;ve done there.

01:50:18.019 --> 01:50:21.024
I think that statement
about requiring retrospectively comply

01:50:21.024 --> 01:50:24.015
with the guidelines is both redundant
and unclear

01:50:24.015 --> 01:50:26.002
and I think it should be deleted.

01:50:28.021 --> 01:50:31.019
I think we obviously have the right
to direct residents

01:50:31.019 --> 01:50:35.023
to remove any structural planting which
we deem to be a safety risk,

01:50:35.023 --> 01:50:39.005
but we don&apos;t need to make a statement
about retrospective compliance.

01:50:39.005 --> 01:50:42.011
You know, people are

01:50:42.011 --> 01:50:46.004
- I mean, how are we going
to know what the state

01:50:46.004 --> 01:50:49.021
of our nature strips is as of tonight?

01:50:49.021 --> 01:50:52.004
How are we going to know when
in five years&apos; time,

01:50:52.004 --> 01:50:55.024
if we find a nature strip among
the 800 acres or so I think it is

01:50:55.024 --> 01:51:00.000
of nature strips we own,
we find a nature strip that doesn&apos;t comply

01:51:00.000 --> 01:51:02.018
with this policy, how are we going
to know when it happened?

01:51:02.018 --> 01:51:06.001
So I think we&apos;re going into a bit
of minefield there, so I think it&apos;s going

01:51:06.001 --> 01:51:07.013
to cause problems in the future.

01:51:07.013 --> 01:51:10.013
I noted the duplicate paragraph
on page 71 as well.

01:51:10.013 --> 01:51:15.008
Dot point 4 on page 74
is missing the last dot point.

01:51:15.008 --> 01:51:18.019
And then we talk about garden edges
and planter boxes on page 75

01:51:18.019 --> 01:51:23.022
and unfortunately my computer is playing
up and I can&apos;t get to page 75

01:51:23.022 --> 01:51:28.004
at the moment but I think that related
when I made my notes

01:51:28.004 --> 01:51:32.023
- that related to tripping hazards
and I would have thought that planter

01:51:32.023 --> 01:51:34.016
boxes are a tripping hazard.

01:51:36.016 --> 01:51:39.002
Oh, no, actually, sorry,
there&apos;s just an edit there.

01:51:39.002 --> 01:51:40.014
I don&apos;t think it is.

01:51:40.014 --> 01:51:42.002
It&apos;s an edit.

01:51:42.002 --> 01:51:46.021
In terms of the merits of the policy,
I sincerely hope we enforce the illegality

01:51:46.021 --> 01:51:48.020
of parking on nature strips.

01:51:48.020 --> 01:51:50.008
We have not done it.

01:51:50.008 --> 01:51:53.013
We&apos;ve ended up with a big car park
in North Torquay on our nature strips

01:51:53.013 --> 01:51:55.015
that houses people&apos;s boats and caravans.

01:51:55.015 --> 01:52:00.005
It&apos;s really very detrimental to amenity,
it&apos;s very detrimental to the environment,

01:52:00.005 --> 01:52:02.020
and it shouldn&apos;t be permitted
and we should be enforcing

01:52:02.020 --> 01:52:05.007
that much more stringently.

01:52:05.007 --> 01:52:07.006
I think the guidelines generally are good.

01:52:07.006 --> 01:52:11.016
Hopefully most people will comply and we
will stop people gravelling their nature

01:52:11.016 --> 01:52:15.011
strips and I hope we do actually go out
with some communication to builders

01:52:15.011 --> 01:52:16.024
and home owners.

01:52:16.024 --> 01:52:19.016
We should be sending these guidelines
to people who apply

01:52:19.016 --> 01:52:23.012
for planning permits or building permits,
or whatever, so that they&apos;ve got them and

01:52:23.012 --> 01:52:25.000
they know them.

01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:27.010
We&apos;re talking
about this not being retrospective,

01:52:27.010 --> 01:52:30.008
if people have gravel or other surfaces
they would incur costs.

01:52:35.023 --> 01:52:40.022
I just feel that we need to be able
to do better than that in the long term.

01:52:40.022 --> 01:52:44.012
I believe there was a requirement
for those people to seek permits before

01:52:44.012 --> 01:52:48.001
they did that
and I believe that needs to be addressed

01:52:48.001 --> 01:52:49.013
in the longer term.

01:52:49.013 --> 01:52:52.002
You know, this is an improvement
on what we had, but it&apos;s

01:52:52.002 --> 01:52:54.013
by no means perfect and I really

01:52:54.013 --> 01:52:57.024
- there&apos;s obviously no point
because everyone has decided

01:52:57.024 --> 01:53:00.022
what they&apos;ll do already,
so I don&apos;t think that there&apos;s any point

01:53:00.022 --> 01:53:03.017
in moving amendments, but I&apos;m tempted
to do that but I won&apos;t.

01:53:03.017 --> 01:53:05.017
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you, Councillor.

01:53:05.017 --> 01:53:08.006
Councillor Wellington, you&apos;ve now gone
over time now.

01:53:08.006 --> 01:53:09.019
CR ROSE HODGE: I&apos;ll just quickly

01:53:09.019 --> 01:53:12.005
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Sure thing,
Councillor Hodge.

01:53:12.005 --> 01:53:14.015
CR ROSE HODGE: I know a lot
of nature strips changed.

01:53:14.015 --> 01:53:17.009
I can remember the drought in 2000
and that&apos;s when a lot

01:53:17.009 --> 01:53:22.003
of people I know let the grasses
go and gravelled,

01:53:22.003 --> 01:53:24.018
and there was only guidelines.

01:53:24.018 --> 01:53:26.014
Now the policy is in, we can look at it.

01:53:26.014 --> 01:53:29.007
And I know people that do prefer grass,
that they

01:53:29.007 --> 01:53:32.007
will probably change their gravel
to grass.

01:53:32.007 --> 01:53:35.015
But I really hope this document is sent
to other agencies.

01:53:35.015 --> 01:53:39.013
I know it doesn&apos;t include them,
but my pet hate

01:53:39.013 --> 01:53:43.011
is that horrendous roundabout
as you come into Torquay,

01:53:43.011 --> 01:53:47.012
it&apos;s the ugliest entrance
into any town in the shire,

01:53:47.012 --> 01:53:51.011
and we have tried to get the Department
of Transport to at least do something

01:53:51.011 --> 01:53:54.008
to it and they just either won&apos;t or don&apos;t.

01:53:54.008 --> 01:53:58.000
So I&apos;d really like
to ensure that the Department

01:53:58.000 --> 01:53:59.013
of Transport and other ones

01:53:59.013 --> 01:54:03.005
- you know,
we can do low maintenance greenery,

01:54:03.005 --> 01:54:07.022
but that is the ugliest roundabout ever
and I&apos;d just like to say it

01:54:07.022 --> 01:54:09.010
is only a start.

01:54:09.010 --> 01:54:12.011
This nature strip policy isn&apos;t perfect.

01:54:12.011 --> 01:54:16.011
I think it opened a Pandora&apos;s box,
actually, from different areas

01:54:16.011 --> 01:54:19.015
of the shire and also parts
of the shire that are

01:54:19.015 --> 01:54:25.022
under the bushfire management overlay.

01:54:25.022 --> 01:54:28.001
So that even comes into play.

01:54:28.001 --> 01:54:33.003
So it isn&apos;t perfect, but it&apos;s a start
and any new developments that come in now,

01:54:33.003 --> 01:54:38.002
and there will be new development
in Torquay, no doubt, and in Winchelsea,

01:54:38.002 --> 01:54:42.001
that with these new developments it&apos;s just
known that grass needs to be placed.

01:54:42.001 --> 01:54:45.000
So I think it&apos;s a good start,
there&apos;s still growth in the area,

01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:48.001
and I think people
could retrospectively change their

01:54:48.001 --> 01:54:51.017
- willingly change their nature strip back.

01:54:51.017 --> 01:54:56.000
So I&apos;ll be voting for this recommendation.

01:54:56.000 --> 01:54:57.013
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

01:54:57.013 --> 01:55:01.002
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: May I just ask
a question, Ms Pattison?

01:55:01.002 --> 01:55:02.015
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes.

01:55:02.015 --> 01:55:06.009
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;m just wondering
could one of the officers just clarify

01:55:06.009 --> 01:55:10.016
for Council how the guidelines
will be enforced?

01:55:10.016 --> 01:55:13.013
Normally guidelines are just that,
they&apos;re only guidelines,

01:55:13.013 --> 01:55:15.024
as Councillor Hodge just stated.

01:55:15.024 --> 01:55:19.009
Are these going to be adopted
into the community local law,

01:55:19.009 --> 01:55:22.001
is that the intention?

01:55:22.001 --> 01:55:24.008
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll pass that on
to our CEO.

01:55:24.008 --> 01:55:27.012
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Thank you for the question,
Councillor Wellington.

01:55:27.012 --> 01:55:31.018
Yes, the intention is that they
will be included in our local laws.

01:55:34.013 --> 01:55:38.022
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;d like
to move an amendment.

01:55:38.022 --> 01:55:43.006
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes,
you can put forward your amendment.

01:55:43.006 --> 01:55:45.015
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: My amendment would
be that

01:55:45.015 --> 01:55:49.007
- I&apos;m having trouble getting my Council
papers up on the screen.

01:55:49.007 --> 01:55:53.024
The amendment would be that Council adopts
the Residential Nature Strip Policy

01:55:53.024 --> 01:55:59.005
and Guidelines subsequent to removal
of that comment

01:55:59.005 --> 01:56:03.003
about Council not intending
to retrospectively enforce the guidelines

01:56:03.003 --> 01:56:08.000
because that&apos;s an issue for the local law,
not for the guidelines themselves.

01:56:08.000 --> 01:56:17.007
So the amendment would be as it&apos;s stated,
save for the removal

01:56:17.007 --> 01:56:21.024
of the statement that Council
(inaudible) retrospectively implement.

01:56:26.020 --> 01:56:30.005
I can&apos;t get the document up
on my computer.

01:56:30.005 --> 01:56:32.017
So the statement I think that I&apos;ve written
in my notes

01:56:32.017 --> 01:56:35.016
is it&apos;s not Council&apos;s intention
to require residents

01:56:35.016 --> 01:56:38.017
to retrospectively comply
with the guidelines.

01:56:38.017 --> 01:56:42.009
I think that that statement should be
deleted and perhaps the officers could put

01:56:42.009 --> 01:56:44.010
up an amendment.

01:56:44.010 --> 01:56:47.020
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll seek
clarification with the mover of the motion

01:56:47.020 --> 01:56:51.004
because otherwise we&apos;ll need to go
to a vote, unless that&apos;s accepted.

01:56:51.004 --> 01:56:52.017
SPEAKER: Which part

01:56:52.017 --> 01:56:54.019
- sorry, Councillor Wellington, which part?

01:56:54.019 --> 01:56:58.001
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: It&apos;s the statement
in the guidelines that says,

01:56:58.001 --> 01:57:01.015
and the officers may be able to direct us
to it, &quot;It is not Council&apos;s intention

01:57:01.015 --> 01:57:03.023
to require residents
to retrospectively comply

01:57:03.023 --> 01:57:08.022
with the guidelines however Council
retains the right to direct any resident

01:57:08.022 --> 01:57:13.024
to remove any structure or planting
which Council deems to be a safety risk&quot;.

01:57:13.024 --> 01:57:15.011
I&apos;d like that

01:57:15.011 --> 01:57:19.003
- I&apos;m suggesting that that statement
is removed because issues of what we bring

01:57:19.003 --> 01:57:22.004
into the local law are for the local law,
not for

01:57:22.004 --> 01:57:28.015
- shouldn&apos;t be incorporated in the policy
or the guidelines.

01:57:28.015 --> 01:57:35.023
So the (inaudible) would change would be
as it is, with the exception

01:57:39.008 --> 01:57:46.023
of (inaudible) paragraph where
that statement fits in the guidelines.

01:57:59.009 --> 01:58:01.011
SPEAKER: Second paragraph on page 71.

01:58:01.011 --> 01:58:04.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: It&apos;s the second
paragraph on page 71.

01:58:04.004 --> 01:58:08.017
Councillor Gazzard, you can either choose
to accept it and then it moves on,

01:58:08.017 --> 01:58:12.023
or you can not accept it and we&apos;ll put it
to the vote

01:58:12.023 --> 01:58:17.008
and then that amendment either lapses or
becomes a substantive.

01:58:17.008 --> 01:58:20.020
So given that you were the mover
of the motion.

01:58:20.020 --> 01:58:24.007
CR KATE GAZZARD: Yeah, I&apos;m happy
to accept that amendment.

01:58:24.007 --> 01:58:25.020
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: I&apos;m not.

01:58:25.020 --> 01:58:27.007
I&apos;m the seconder.

01:58:27.007 --> 01:58:29.014
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: The seconder doesn&apos;t,
okay.

01:58:29.014 --> 01:58:31.020
Just hold on one second.

01:58:31.020 --> 01:58:34.022
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Can I just explain why
I don&apos;t want to second it?

01:58:34.022 --> 01:58:36.010
Is that alright?

01:58:36.010 --> 01:58:40.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Just hold on a second,
if you will, please.

01:58:40.002 --> 01:58:41.015
Jake, can you

01:58:43.017 --> 01:58:46.023
- JAKE BROWN: Through you, Mayor,
if you could just give us 30

01:58:46.023 --> 01:58:48.014
-
ROBYN SEYMOUR: I think you missed

01:58:48.014 --> 01:58:52.002
the discussion,
which was Councillor Gazzard accepted

01:58:52.002 --> 01:58:55.007
the motion, but

01:58:55.007 --> 01:58:57.019
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor
Stapleton did not.

01:58:57.019 --> 01:59:01.001
Do we go to a vote then
if the seconder does not accept

01:59:01.001 --> 01:59:04.008
- JAKE BROWN: Through you, Mayor,
you require both mover and seconder.

01:59:04.008 --> 01:59:05.021
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Okay.

01:59:05.021 --> 01:59:07.020
So we&apos;ll now put the amendment
to the vote.

01:59:10.007 --> 01:59:12.011
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I think
the question is

01:59:12.011 --> 01:59:15.017
whether we accept the amendment
and then debate it.

01:59:15.017 --> 01:59:18.012
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: That&apos;s what I
was talking about, sorry.

01:59:18.012 --> 01:59:21.024
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I don&apos;t think
there&apos;s a seconder to it yet, is there,

01:59:21.024 --> 01:59:23.012
to the amendment?

01:59:23.012 --> 01:59:24.024
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No.

01:59:24.024 --> 01:59:28.016
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: So the amendment is
to delete the statement that starts

01:59:28.016 --> 01:59:31.002
&quot;It is not Council&apos;s intention
to require residents

01:59:31.002 --> 01:59:33.020
to retrospectively comply
with the guidelines however&quot;,

01:59:33.020 --> 01:59:37.004
and I think we should just leave it
in there that Council retains the right

01:59:37.004 --> 01:59:38.017
to direct any residents.

01:59:38.017 --> 01:59:41.015
So we delete the words from
&quot;It is not Council&apos;s intention&quot;

01:59:41.015 --> 01:59:43.022
through to &quot;however&quot;

01:59:43.022 --> 01:59:55.009
in that second paragraph on page 71.

01:59:55.009 --> 01:59:56.022
CR KATE GAZZARD: I&apos;m happy to not

01:59:56.022 --> 01:59:59.010
- just to go back to the original motion.

01:59:59.010 --> 02:00:01.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Okay, thank you.

02:00:01.002 --> 02:00:04.007
So we&apos;ve just had a clarification
Councillor Gazzard does not accept

02:00:04.007 --> 02:00:06.013
the amendment,
nor does Councillor Stapleton.

02:00:06.013 --> 02:00:09.013
So we will return to the original motion
and we&apos;ll put the motion.

02:00:09.013 --> 02:00:11.015
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: No,
I think my motion

02:00:11.015 --> 02:00:13.002
- my motion

02:00:13.002 --> 02:00:16.001
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: It lapses
with the mover and the seconder.

02:00:16.001 --> 02:00:19.016
{WHITE} CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: My motion
needs to be put if there&apos;s a seconder

02:00:19.016 --> 02:00:21.004
of it.

02:00:21.004 --> 02:00:23.021
JAKE BROWN: Through you, Mayor,
to accept the amendment,

02:00:23.021 --> 02:00:25.022
you need the mover and the seconder
to agree.

02:00:25.022 --> 02:00:27.024
If not,
then Councillor Wellington can seek

02:00:27.024 --> 02:00:29.012
a seconder for her amendment.

02:00:29.012 --> 02:00:32.015
If a seconder is accepted,
then Council may debate the amendment.

02:00:32.015 --> 02:00:36.021
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Is there a seconder
to Councillor Wellington&apos;s amendment?

02:00:36.021 --> 02:00:39.021
Councillor Barker.

02:00:39.021 --> 02:00:42.020
JAKE BROWN: Through you, Mayor,
can I just put it up on the screen

02:00:42.020 --> 02:00:45.014
to get the wording right first
to make sure everyone is happy

02:00:45.014 --> 02:00:48.013
and Councillor Wellington is happy
before we commence debate?

02:00:48.013 --> 02:00:50.011
I&apos;ll just need probably about 60 seconds.

02:00:50.011 --> 02:00:51.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Okay.

02:00:51.023 --> 02:00:54.003
We&apos;ll just wait for that to be put
on the screen.

02:01:57.024 --> 02:02:01.009
JAKE BROWN: Through you, Mayor,
we&apos;re displaying the proposed amendment

02:02:01.009 --> 02:02:05.007
on the screen for Councillor Barker or
for Councillor Wellington

02:02:05.007 --> 02:02:09.024
to confirm that&apos;s the amendment she&apos;d like
to move and for Councillor Barker

02:02:09.024 --> 02:02:13.022
to confirm that that&apos;s the amendment
he wishes to second.

02:02:13.022 --> 02:02:15.010
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:02:15.010 --> 02:02:18.020
Councillor Barker, are you happy
to second the amendment?

02:02:18.020 --> 02:02:20.007
CR PAUL BARKER: Yes.

02:02:20.007 --> 02:02:24.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Wellington,
do you wish to speak to the amendment?

02:02:24.002 --> 02:02:25.022
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thanks so much.

02:02:25.022 --> 02:02:27.019
I think it&apos;s probably reasonably clear.

02:02:27.019 --> 02:02:30.008
But I would just say
to Councillors I don&apos;t believe this

02:02:30.008 --> 02:02:32.013
is anything to be frightened of.

02:02:32.013 --> 02:02:35.006
What it&apos;s basically doing
is removing from the guidelines

02:02:35.006 --> 02:02:38.011
- the guidelines itself should be
about what we want on nature strips,

02:02:38.011 --> 02:02:40.009
not whether or not we&apos;re going to enforce.

02:02:40.009 --> 02:02:43.021
The guidelines need to address
whether or not you can have gravel and

02:02:43.021 --> 02:02:45.019
whether or not you can have plants.

02:02:45.019 --> 02:02:50.023
Enforcement is an issue
for the community amenity local law.

02:02:50.023 --> 02:02:52.010
There is nothing

02:02:52.010 --> 02:02:56.006
- we could in the community amenity local
law adopt the guidelines

02:02:56.006 --> 02:03:01.024
and put a proviso that we won&apos;t enforce
prior to a certain date.

02:03:01.024 --> 02:03:05.015
I think legally we wouldn&apos;t have a right
to enforce retrospectively anyway.

02:03:05.015 --> 02:03:08.022
People can&apos;t be expected to comply
with things that don&apos;t apply to them

02:03:08.022 --> 02:03:10.009
at the time.

02:03:10.009 --> 02:03:11.022
So I think it&apos;s low risk.

02:03:11.022 --> 02:03:17.003
I think it is sensible
to keep our options open, and particularly

02:03:17.003 --> 02:03:20.024
because I think the wording
is currently very ambiguous and end up

02:03:20.024 --> 02:03:26.016
with problems because it&apos;s not clear when
we&apos;re talking about retrospective,

02:03:26.016 --> 02:03:32.015
we&apos;re not addressing the date
from which retrospectively applies.

02:03:32.015 --> 02:03:37.000
So I think it&apos;s difficult
in its current format.

02:03:37.000 --> 02:03:38.019
It&apos;s going to cause problems.

02:03:38.019 --> 02:03:43.000
Removing it will not cause problems and
will make the policy clearer.

02:03:43.000 --> 02:03:45.019
And I thank Councillor Barker
for seconding the amendment.

02:03:45.019 --> 02:03:47.007
Thank you.

02:03:49.007 --> 02:03:51.020
CR PAUL BARKER: Mayor,
I just have a question, if I may.

02:03:51.020 --> 02:03:53.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes.

02:03:53.007 --> 02:03:58.017
CR PAUL BARKER: As far as the date
of this policy being applicable,

02:03:58.017 --> 02:04:03.001
I would assume it would be today&apos;s date
once it&apos;s passed the meeting, if it

02:04:03.001 --> 02:04:06.015
is passed, that
is the date it becomes applicable.

02:04:06.015 --> 02:04:09.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: That would
be my understanding, yes.

02:04:09.007 --> 02:04:12.000
Councillor Barker, did you wish to speak
to the amendment?

02:04:12.000 --> 02:04:13.013
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Mayor

02:04:13.013 --> 02:04:15.000
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Pattison.

02:04:15.000 --> 02:04:18.017
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;m sorry,
can I please say something?

02:04:18.017 --> 02:04:20.023
I didn&apos;t use my full time.

02:04:20.023 --> 02:04:25.007
But just in relation to that, the issue
will arrive in the future when we discover

02:04:25.007 --> 02:04:30.020
that somebody has a nature strip
which does not comply with the policy

02:04:30.020 --> 02:04:35.021
and the question at that point would be
what does retrospective application

02:04:35.021 --> 02:04:37.011
of the policy mean at that point.

02:04:37.011 --> 02:04:41.011
So I think it
is going to be a difficult clause.

02:04:44.013 --> 02:04:46.000
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:04:46.000 --> 02:04:49.011
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: It doesn&apos;t really
make sense to have (inaudible).

02:04:49.011 --> 02:04:51.018
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes,
Councillor Stapleton.

02:04:51.018 --> 02:04:55.007
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: My recollection
from one of the briefings was that

02:04:55.007 --> 02:04:59.019
we did seek legal advice
of the policy and guidelines.

02:04:59.019 --> 02:05:01.006
Can I just

02:05:01.006 --> 02:05:03.004
- is that correct, and what the advice was.

02:05:03.004 --> 02:05:06.000
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll put that through
to our CEO, please.

02:05:06.000 --> 02:05:08.009
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Thank you,
Councillor Stapleton.

02:05:08.009 --> 02:05:12.005
I might refer that to our General Manager
of Place Making and Environment to respond

02:05:12.005 --> 02:05:13.018
to.

02:05:13.018 --> 02:05:18.017
CHRIS PIKE: Yes, through you, Mayor,
we did seek legal advice,

02:05:18.017 --> 02:05:23.023
but I don&apos;t have that
before me right now and so I&apos;m

02:05:23.023 --> 02:05:26.014
going to be guessing if I try
to fill in the blanks in terms

02:05:26.014 --> 02:05:32.001
of exactly what it told us,
but we were providing it so as

02:05:32.001 --> 02:05:37.018
to position ourselves
to have something that was workable and,

02:05:37.018 --> 02:05:41.015
if necessary, enforceable
and found the feedback helpful

02:05:41.015 --> 02:05:43.020
and incorporated it where it was provided.

02:05:43.020 --> 02:05:45.019
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And just to add
to that

02:05:45.019 --> 02:05:47.007
- sorry, Councillor Wellington

02:05:47.007 --> 02:05:53.016
- at the briefings we were advised
that aerial photos are taken and

02:05:53.016 --> 02:05:56.020
they have recently been taken
for the assessment for rating

02:05:56.020 --> 02:06:01.005
and the assessment of property values
and that that would be the basis utilised

02:06:01.005 --> 02:06:05.003
around understanding retrospective nature
strips, et cetera, because that&apos;s

02:06:05.003 --> 02:06:09.020
across the shire and that was
from my recollection of those briefings

02:06:09.020 --> 02:06:16.003
and in relation to the legal avenues
around retrospective rectification

02:06:16.003 --> 02:06:18.002
of nature strips, and the like.

02:06:18.002 --> 02:06:19.022
We&apos;ll now move on to Councillor Barker.

02:06:19.022 --> 02:06:21.016
Did you wish to speak to the amendment?

02:06:21.016 --> 02:06:23.011
CR PAUL BARKER: No, it just makes sense.

02:06:23.011 --> 02:06:26.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Does any
other Councillor wish to speak

02:06:26.005 --> 02:06:27.018
to the amendment?

02:06:27.018 --> 02:06:29.005
Councillor Hodge?

02:06:29.005 --> 02:06:30.020
CR HODGE: I won&apos;t be supporting it.

02:06:30.020 --> 02:06:33.001
I&apos;m just foreshadowing go back
to the original.

02:06:33.001 --> 02:06:34.013
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:06:34.013 --> 02:06:36.008
We&apos;ll now put the amendment to the vote.

02:06:36.008 --> 02:06:37.021
All those

02:06:37.021 --> 02:06:40.024
- so just to clarify, all those in favour
of moving to the amendment,

02:06:40.024 --> 02:06:42.011
please raise your hand.

02:06:42.011 --> 02:06:43.024
That&apos;s Councillor

02:06:43.024 --> 02:06:45.011
- and all those opposed?

02:06:45.011 --> 02:06:47.002
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Sorry, can I

02:06:47.002 --> 02:06:50.018
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: The amendment lapses
and we move back to the substantive.

02:06:50.018 --> 02:06:53.021
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Can I ask what
the vote was, Mayor Stapleton

02:06:53.021 --> 02:06:55.008
- I mean Pattison.

02:06:55.008 --> 02:06:56.021
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Pattison.

02:06:56.021 --> 02:06:59.018
It was two for the amendment
and seven opposing the amendment.

02:06:59.018 --> 02:07:01.008
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you.

02:07:01.008 --> 02:07:04.012
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: We will now vote
on the nature strip policy as per

02:07:04.012 --> 02:07:07.010
- sorry, Councillor Gazzard,
did you have any closing remarks?

02:07:07.010 --> 02:07:08.023
CR KATE GAZZARD: Thank you.

02:07:08.023 --> 02:07:10.010
Sorry for the confusion.

02:07:10.010 --> 02:07:14.016
I do think that removing that phrase
doesn&apos;t necessarily clear it

02:07:14.016 --> 02:07:22.009
up given the sentence before it
and my concern is that not only applies

02:07:22.009 --> 02:07:24.014
to gravel nature strips,
but that also applies

02:07:24.014 --> 02:07:28.008
to existing vegetation and wildlife.

02:07:28.008 --> 02:07:30.011
So I&apos;m happy that

02:07:30.011 --> 02:07:34.024
- as a first guideline I think this policy
is a good one, so yes, happy

02:07:37.019 --> 02:07:39.006
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:07:39.006 --> 02:07:40.022
We&apos;ll now put the motion to the vote.

02:07:40.022 --> 02:07:42.022
All those in favour.

02:07:42.022 --> 02:07:44.024
All those opposed.

02:07:44.024 --> 02:07:46.011
And the motion is carried.

02:07:49.010 --> 02:07:52.024
Given the time
and it&apos;s now 8.08 and so Councillors,

02:07:52.024 --> 02:07:55.012
we have been running
through the agenda now for two

02:07:55.012 --> 02:07:58.018
and a bit hours,
so we&apos;ll have a short break.

02:07:58.018 --> 02:08:01.019
I know ask for a motion
to adjourn the meeting.

02:08:01.019 --> 02:08:04.013
Councillor Bodsworth, and seconded
by Councillor Barker.

02:08:04.013 --> 02:08:06.001
All those in favour.

02:08:06.001 --> 02:08:09.002
And the motion is carried.

02:08:09.002 --> 02:08:12.016
And we will be returning at 8.20.

02:08:15.008 --> 02:08:16.021
Thank you.

02:08:16.021 --> 02:08:21.023
(Short break) MAYOR LIZ PATTISON:
Welcome back, those of you,

02:08:21.023 --> 02:08:23.013
for our Council meeting tonight.

02:08:23.013 --> 02:08:26.014
I just will seek a motion
to resume standing orders.

02:08:26.014 --> 02:08:29.001
Councillor Allen, and seconded
by Councillor Hodge.

02:08:29.001 --> 02:08:31.010
All those in favour.

02:08:31.010 --> 02:08:33.000
And the motion is carried.

02:08:33.000 --> 02:08:38.012
We&apos;ll now kick straight off into 4.6,
COVID Recovery Assistance Program Report.

02:08:38.012 --> 02:08:41.012
This item presents Council
with the final report on the outcomes

02:08:41.012 --> 02:08:45.013
of projects awarded under the COVID-19
Recovery Assistance Grant Program.

02:08:45.013 --> 02:08:47.000
Do I have a mover of a motion?

02:08:47.000 --> 02:08:48.013
Councillor Allen.

02:08:48.013 --> 02:08:50.000
And a seconder?

02:08:50.000 --> 02:08:51.013
Councillor Hodge.

02:08:51.013 --> 02:08:54.004
Councillor Allen, I&apos;m assuming that&apos;s
as per the motion?

02:08:54.004 --> 02:08:56.021
CR GARY ALLEN: As per the recommendation,
yes, thank you.

02:08:56.021 --> 02:09:00.019
Included in tonight&apos;s meeting papers
is an extremely comprehensive report

02:09:00.019 --> 02:09:05.007
about the COVID Recovery Assistance Grants
and I encourage residents to read

02:09:05.007 --> 02:09:10.003
about the 36 grants
and the 9 Council programs enabled

02:09:10.003 --> 02:09:12.009
through this initiative.

02:09:12.009 --> 02:09:15.010
I wish
to congratulate the previous Council

02:09:15.010 --> 02:09:21.015
for their foresight to envisage
and resource this initiative and

02:09:21.015 --> 02:09:26.009
to the officers who were tasked
with the job of implementation.

02:09:26.009 --> 02:09:31.015
We were all uncertain about the timeframe
and the future individual

02:09:31.015 --> 02:09:34.004
and community impacts of the pandemic.

02:09:36.016 --> 02:09:39.005
55% of the package supported local
businesses

02:09:39.005 --> 02:09:44.014
and 45% was allocated to community-based
initiatives.

02:09:44.014 --> 02:09:50.003
The Surf Coast Shire was thus providing
real and timely capacity building

02:09:50.003 --> 02:09:53.010
at a time of reduced confidence.

02:09:53.010 --> 02:09:57.020
The major determinant of economic activity
and growth is the level of business

02:09:57.020 --> 02:10:01.001
and consumer confidence.

02:10:01.001 --> 02:10:06.003
Initiatives were varied, ranging
from farm gate art, adopt a worker,

02:10:06.003 --> 02:10:11.012
to a large freezer for Torquay food aid
to support an ostrich farm that lost its

02:10:11.012 --> 02:10:15.009
main source of income from tourism
and the Council was prepared

02:10:15.009 --> 02:10:21.000
to forgo income by reducing
and staging fees and charges.

02:10:21.000 --> 02:10:25.014
I am particularly pleased that $100,000
was allocated

02:10:25.014 --> 02:10:28.022
to the Creative Communities Fund.

02:10:28.022 --> 02:10:34.001
Economic rationalists may roll their eyes,
but this allocation recognises

02:10:34.001 --> 02:10:38.008
the importance of the non-tangible
benefits of the arts

02:10:38.008 --> 02:10:44.010
to individual emotional health as well as
to the artists whose income

02:10:44.010 --> 02:10:48.004
and job security is so often overlooked.

02:10:48.004 --> 02:10:51.014
A very big well done to all concerned.

02:10:51.014 --> 02:10:56.016
This is a comprehensive report
on a targeted and compassionate program.

02:10:56.016 --> 02:10:58.017
Thank you.

02:10:58.017 --> 02:11:00.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:11:00.004 --> 02:11:02.001
Councillor Hodge, did you wish to speak?

02:11:02.001 --> 02:11:03.018
CR ROSE HODGE: Yes, thank you, Mayor.

02:11:03.018 --> 02:11:08.009
When the Council of 2016 and 20 were faced
with never before a situation such

02:11:08.009 --> 02:11:13.006
as COVID and after much discussion,
I think it was in May 2020 we placed

02:11:13.006 --> 02:11:16.023
the money, nearly $1 million,
to help combat any unforeseeable impacts

02:11:16.023 --> 02:11:18.014
on our community.

02:11:18.014 --> 02:11:24.022
The impacts were on personal, community,
regional, state and national levels.

02:11:24.022 --> 02:11:30.003
We were trying to do something
in such a confused time in our lives.

02:11:30.003 --> 02:11:33.023
With lockdowns, we had challenges
in economic, physical and mental health

02:11:33.023 --> 02:11:36.012
and especially social connections.

02:11:36.012 --> 02:11:40.004
There are many statistics
in the comprehensive report that

02:11:40.004 --> 02:11:42.017
is well worth a read, but we did lose

02:11:42.017 --> 02:11:48.001
- in Surf Coast, we had 52.9%
of businesses apply for JobSeeker

02:11:48.001 --> 02:11:51.015
and a loss of over $190 million
in tourism.

02:11:51.015 --> 02:11:56.005
One of the principles was lead initiatives
and support others.

02:11:56.005 --> 02:11:59.023
Council gave the officers the ability
to quickly assess

02:11:59.023 --> 02:12:04.014
and determine applications
into the grants, eliminating wait times

02:12:04.014 --> 02:12:07.009
for the monthly Council meetings.

02:12:07.009 --> 02:12:12.007
The report comprehensively shows where
and how and what the outcomes were

02:12:12.007 --> 02:12:14.021
with every successful applicant.

02:12:14.021 --> 02:12:17.021
Just to mention a few,
the feed me Surf Coast, which

02:12:17.021 --> 02:12:20.003
is such an important part
of our community now

02:12:20.003 --> 02:12:25.001
- the food parcels went from 30 to 150
and meals increased from 90 to 520.

02:12:25.001 --> 02:12:30.014
32 volunteers were trained
with the grants that we gave them

02:12:30.014 --> 02:12:35.009
and the Lions certainly came and helped
and they were a fantastic volunteer help.

02:12:35.009 --> 02:12:40.007
The community houses also led the way too,
with Let&apos;s Go Outside initiatives

02:12:40.007 --> 02:12:42.022
and getting people
outside in a safe distance,

02:12:42.022 --> 02:12:45.000
but still socially connected.

02:12:45.000 --> 02:12:48.003
The mental health projects were also
supported and the youth.

02:12:50.007 --> 02:12:54.017
Initiatives were all across the shire
and the rapid response ones were

02:12:54.017 --> 02:13:00.010
particularly terrific that the officers
could get on this very quickly and to help

02:13:00.010 --> 02:13:02.022
out with community groups
as Adopt a Worker,

02:13:02.022 --> 02:13:06.009
at Lorne the toy library,
the sensory garden at Winchelsea,

02:13:06.009 --> 02:13:10.024
bike hubs, and a full list of all this
is in the report.

02:13:10.024 --> 02:13:14.020
And the outcomes, as you will read,
were all positive.

02:13:14.020 --> 02:13:19.001
Overall, the COVID-19
Recovery Assistance Grants Program were

02:13:19.001 --> 02:13:23.017
underpinned by our wonderful community
and the countless volunteers who wanted

02:13:23.017 --> 02:13:27.003
to make a difference in a challenging time

02:13:27.003 --> 02:13:32.019
It led to incredible projects where people
gained skills and found new legacies

02:13:32.019 --> 02:13:37.015
and I too would sincerely like
to thank the staff that put so much

02:13:37.015 --> 02:13:40.024
of their lives into this report.

02:13:40.024 --> 02:13:45.017
I don&apos;t want to miss out anyone,
but special mention to Gretchen, Matt,

02:13:45.017 --> 02:13:47.005
Simon.

02:13:47.005 --> 02:13:49.017
I know there are others, so please pass on
to the teams,

02:13:49.017 --> 02:13:52.024
but anyone reading that report
will see that that was money really well

02:13:52.024 --> 02:13:54.012
spent.

02:13:54.012 --> 02:13:57.013
Sometimes, you know, people are
&quot;you shouldn&apos;t be doing grants&quot;.

02:13:57.013 --> 02:13:59.015
Well, if anyone complains
about this giving

02:13:59.015 --> 02:14:03.000
to the outcomes that we received,
especially from Feed Me and

02:14:03.000 --> 02:14:06.009
all those other ones,
it was a wonderful initiative

02:14:06.009 --> 02:14:10.024
and I thank the past Council,
but this Council too for continuing it

02:14:10.024 --> 02:14:14.014
because it was so important
to our community and I think we&apos;re better

02:14:14.014 --> 02:14:17.017
for it, we&apos;re stronger for it,
and hopefully nothing like this

02:14:17.017 --> 02:14:20.005
will happen again,
but we know we&apos;ve got the resources

02:14:20.005 --> 02:14:21.017
to do it.

02:14:21.017 --> 02:14:24.000
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: You&apos;ve currently gone
over.

02:14:24.000 --> 02:14:25.012
Thank you.

02:14:25.012 --> 02:14:27.007
Do any other Councillors wish to speak?

02:14:27.007 --> 02:14:29.005
Thanks for the clapping.

02:14:29.005 --> 02:14:30.018
Councillor Wellington?

02:14:33.015 --> 02:14:35.012
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thanks very much.

02:14:35.012 --> 02:14:38.012
Look, there&apos;s a huge report
and it&apos;s some really fantastic stuff

02:14:38.012 --> 02:14:40.000
that was done with these grants.

02:14:40.000 --> 02:14:41.012
It was a huge amount of money.

02:14:41.012 --> 02:14:43.008
It does have actually quite a

02:14:43.008 --> 02:14:51.007
- there&apos;s quite a focus on outcomes here,
although some of them weren&apos;t necessarily

02:14:51.007 --> 02:14:53.022
- you know, they were one-off
kind of things and it&apos;s hard

02:14:53.022 --> 02:15:01.017
to see what sustainable difference, if you
like, they made.

02:15:01.017 --> 02:15:04.007
But it was important
to get community together

02:15:04.007 --> 02:15:07.009
at various times, get back together and
to support certain sectors

02:15:07.009 --> 02:15:08.022
of the community.

02:15:08.022 --> 02:15:11.018
I have two I wanted to comment on
in particular, though.

02:15:11.018 --> 02:15:14.018
One is the Summer Shuttle program,
Torquay/Jan Juc,

02:15:14.018 --> 02:15:19.018
and I think that&apos;s the one that was
implemented directly after the elections

02:15:19.018 --> 02:15:25.023
of 2020 and I think it was in relation
to the current proposal that we have

02:15:25.023 --> 02:15:31.021
a free shuttle bus service around Torquay
and Jan Juc and there&apos;s a whole

02:15:31.021 --> 02:15:34.007
- we ran that and it cost quite a lot
of money, $48,000.

02:15:37.014 --> 02:15:41.004
The outcomes are reported
as being extremely positive

02:15:41.004 --> 02:15:44.017
- people were employed,
the initiatives were carbon neutral,

02:15:44.017 --> 02:15:47.024
you know, just different details
about the people who rode on it,

02:15:47.024 --> 02:15:50.005
but the reality of that

02:15:50.005 --> 02:15:53.002
- and this is really an issue
about the way we report, as opposed

02:15:53.002 --> 02:15:55.022
to an issue about
whether we should have funded that shuttle

02:15:55.022 --> 02:15:57.009
bus.

02:15:57.009 --> 02:16:00.018
I don&apos;t think I supported it at the time,
but that&apos;s not to say it was wrong

02:16:00.018 --> 02:16:04.018
for Councillors to support it, but I would
like a more objective outcome report

02:16:04.018 --> 02:16:09.003
on that and the reality was that
the cost per person was unbelievably high.

02:16:09.003 --> 02:16:12.011
There was very few people that took it up.

02:16:12.011 --> 02:16:16.001
I would like that to be put down
as a big tick, which it seems to be

02:16:16.001 --> 02:16:17.014
at the moment.

02:16:17.014 --> 02:16:25.013
It says that objectives (inaudible) I
don&apos;t know what the objectives were,

02:16:29.020 --> 02:16:35.011
but there&apos;s certainly people used
(inaudible) did not make this

02:16:35.011 --> 02:16:36.023
a successful program.

02:16:36.023 --> 02:16:41.009
I think we need to just recognise that
and we don&apos;t want to be sort of conveying

02:16:41.009 --> 02:16:45.003
to people that it was very successful
when it actually, in my view, was not.

02:16:45.003 --> 02:16:47.017
The other thing is just in relation
to the (inaudible).

02:16:50.019 --> 02:16:53.010
I would make the comment there was
a very small uptake.

02:16:53.010 --> 02:16:56.005
I can&apos;t really tell the numbers
from the report,

02:16:56.005 --> 02:16:59.006
but there was a very
small uptake from the non-Torquay

02:16:59.006 --> 02:17:00.022
areas of the shire.

02:17:00.022 --> 02:17:05.018
So what we&apos;ve got there, in my view,
is probably a reasonably good view

02:17:05.018 --> 02:17:07.023
about what the youth
of Torquay (inaudible)

02:17:07.023 --> 02:17:12.018
but I don&apos;t think that that should be
being relied on in relation to the views

02:17:12.018 --> 02:17:14.023
of the youth around the other parts
of the shire.

02:17:14.023 --> 02:17:16.016
So I think

02:17:16.016 --> 02:17:19.022
- personally I&apos;d like
to see (inaudible) statistician engaged

02:17:19.022 --> 02:17:22.016
by this Council
because we&apos;re increasingly doing surveys

02:17:22.016 --> 02:17:26.000
and I think sometimes we rely
on results in a way that we shouldn&apos;t

02:17:26.000 --> 02:17:31.014
and it can be misleading in terms
of future decision making.

02:17:31.014 --> 02:17:34.014
So overall I think there were some good
projects in this,

02:17:34.014 --> 02:17:36.013
there were some that weren&apos;t so successful

02:17:36.013 --> 02:17:39.004
We need to be clear
about what was not successful as well

02:17:39.004 --> 02:17:44.023
as what was and I&apos;m happy
to see the report and to note what came

02:17:44.023 --> 02:17:46.011
out of it.

02:17:46.011 --> 02:17:48.013
Thank you.

02:17:48.013 --> 02:17:52.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Allen,
did you have any closing statements?

02:17:52.002 --> 02:17:53.014
CR GARY ALLEN: No thanks.

02:17:53.014 --> 02:17:56.013
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Barker,
did you have something

02:17:56.013 --> 02:17:58.003
- you wanted to speak to the motion?

02:17:58.003 --> 02:17:59.015
CR PAUL BARKER: Thank you.

02:17:59.015 --> 02:18:02.016
I&apos;m happy to support the motion,
but only once in this whole agenda

02:18:02.016 --> 02:18:05.009
is return on investment mentioned.

02:18:05.009 --> 02:18:07.019
Any time that we&apos;re spending
other people&apos;s money,

02:18:07.019 --> 02:18:12.003
it&apos;s essential that that money spent
delivers a positive need

02:18:12.003 --> 02:18:13.015
for the community.

02:18:13.015 --> 02:18:15.018
Now,
that&apos;s going to be subjective depending

02:18:15.018 --> 02:18:20.006
on the individual, but a million dollars
is a hell of a lot of money.

02:18:20.006 --> 02:18:26.017
And even though it was $924,711,
that&apos;s still a hell of a lot of money.

02:18:26.017 --> 02:18:32.001
And as Councillor Wellington mentioned,
to gloss over the spend

02:18:32.001 --> 02:18:38.007
on certain elements and not be critical
is a disservice to

02:18:38.007 --> 02:18:41.017
all those people in the community
that are working hard to pay their rates.

02:18:41.017 --> 02:18:46.023
So I hope it serves as a lesson for all
of us that the next time government claims

02:18:46.023 --> 02:18:51.004
there&apos;s an emergency and wants to pump
out ratepayer or taxpayer funds,

02:18:51.004 --> 02:18:57.001
take a moment, take a day, take two days,
a week, a month, just as long as you need

02:18:57.001 --> 02:19:01.016
to consider what are the long-term
ramifications of significant spending.

02:19:01.016 --> 02:19:04.013
Governments have a habit
of breaking your leg,

02:19:04.013 --> 02:19:08.015
stealing your wallet, giving you crutches
and then expecting you to be happy.

02:19:08.015 --> 02:19:12.004
There&apos;s always going to be an emergency
that governments can claim they need

02:19:12.004 --> 02:19:17.001
to do extraordinary measures,
but just remember the next time it happens

02:19:17.001 --> 02:19:23.016
, don&apos;t need to lose your collective minds
and blow money on unnecessary projects

02:19:23.016 --> 02:19:26.019
- one that I supported,
being that shuttle bus,

02:19:26.019 --> 02:19:30.018
and in hindsight it&apos;s probably one
of the worst decisions I&apos;ve made,

02:19:30.018 --> 02:19:33.017
but I learnt from it
and I&apos;ll definitely be more critical

02:19:33.017 --> 02:19:35.008
on wasteful spending in the future.

02:19:37.011 --> 02:19:38.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:19:38.023 --> 02:19:40.019
Councillor Allen, any closing remarks?

02:19:40.019 --> 02:19:43.008
CR GARY ALLEN: Just simply
to say that often assessment

02:19:43.008 --> 02:19:47.013
of the success or otherwise of programs
is very much in the eye of the beholder

02:19:47.013 --> 02:19:50.010
and it does depend on the values
and the angle

02:19:50.010 --> 02:19:52.015
from which you approach things.

02:19:52.015 --> 02:20:00.018
Particularly with non-tangible programs,
it&apos;s very hard, very hard to quantify it.

02:20:00.018 --> 02:20:06.005
But overall, I&apos;m just so delighted
with the positive result

02:20:06.005 --> 02:20:10.017
of the program and again,
congratulate all concerned.

02:20:10.017 --> 02:20:12.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:20:12.004 --> 02:20:13.020
We&apos;ll now put the motion to the vote.

02:20:13.020 --> 02:20:15.024
All those in favour.

02:20:15.024 --> 02:20:17.011
And the motion is carried.

02:20:22.019 --> 02:20:26.001
We now move on to 4.7,
Reviewing the Adopted Strategy Cash

02:20:26.001 --> 02:20:28.003
Reserve and program of projects.

02:20:28.003 --> 02:20:31.004
This report is presented
to Council following a review which has

02:20:31.004 --> 02:20:34.016
identified that some funds held
in the Adopted Strategy Reserve

02:20:34.016 --> 02:20:37.018
and funds allocated
to particular projects are no longer

02:20:37.018 --> 02:20:39.005
required.

02:20:39.005 --> 02:20:42.009
The recommendation before us tonight seeks
a decision from Council

02:20:42.009 --> 02:20:47.019
to allocate these funds,
totalling $1,048,693,

02:20:47.019 --> 02:20:50.009
to the Surf Coast Aquatic
and Health Centre project.

02:20:50.009 --> 02:20:52.021
Do I have a mover?

02:20:52.021 --> 02:20:54.008
Councillor Stapleton.

02:20:54.008 --> 02:20:55.021
As per the recommendation?

02:20:55.021 --> 02:20:57.020
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: Yes, thank you, Mayor.

02:20:57.020 --> 02:20:59.011
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And a seconder?

02:20:59.011 --> 02:21:00.023
Councillor Schonfelder.

02:21:00.023 --> 02:21:02.011
And would you like to speak?

02:21:02.011 --> 02:21:04.004
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: I will, thank you.

02:21:04.004 --> 02:21:06.021
So as we know,
there&apos;s currently a $3.5 million shortfall

02:21:06.021 --> 02:21:10.015
in funding for the Surf Coast Aquatic
and Health Centre and this motion provides

02:21:10.015 --> 02:21:14.014
an opportunity for Council
to allocate a little over $1 million

02:21:14.014 --> 02:21:19.005
from the Adopted Strategy Reserve and
from Council&apos;s program of projects

02:21:19.005 --> 02:21:22.002
to help meet some of this shortfall.

02:21:22.002 --> 02:21:25.009
Just by way of strategy,
the Adopted Strategy Reserve is one

02:21:25.009 --> 02:21:29.016
of 15 cash reserves that hold funds
for specific purposes determined

02:21:29.016 --> 02:21:32.019
by Council
and when strategies are approved

02:21:32.019 --> 02:21:37.003
by Council, funds for projects related
to that strategy are held in the Adopted

02:21:37.003 --> 02:21:41.008
Strategy Reserve until the project
is considered live.

02:21:41.008 --> 02:21:45.021
In some instances,
as priorities shift or circumstances

02:21:45.021 --> 02:21:50.004
change, cash may end up sitting
in this reserve for many years awaiting

02:21:50.004 --> 02:21:52.017
for a project to start.

02:21:52.017 --> 02:21:55.022
Officers have recently reviewed
the projects that are sitting

02:21:55.022 --> 02:22:00.000
in the Adopted Strategy Reserve
to determine whether we are holding cash

02:22:00.000 --> 02:22:04.007
in that reserve that due to timing
of projects, or for other reasons,

02:22:04.007 --> 02:22:07.017
may be better allocated
to a higher priority, which

02:22:07.017 --> 02:22:10.015
in this instance it would be
for the Surf Coast Aquatic

02:22:10.015 --> 02:22:12.002
and Health Centre.

02:22:12.002 --> 02:22:15.016
Two projects that I&apos;ll just highlight
in particular offer an opportunity

02:22:15.016 --> 02:22:20.003
to transfer more than $700,000
to the pool budget.

02:22:20.003 --> 02:22:24.003
One is the Torquay Town Centre project,
which currently has an allocation

02:22:24.003 --> 02:22:28.002
of $825,000 against it.

02:22:28.002 --> 02:22:33.019
It is proposed that $225,000 of this
is retained in the Adopted Strategy

02:22:33.019 --> 02:22:38.013
Reserve, which would be used
to develop a public domain plan

02:22:38.013 --> 02:22:40.010
for the Torquay Town Centre.

02:22:40.010 --> 02:22:44.007
Now, given that this project has been
on Council&apos;s advocacy list for a number

02:22:44.007 --> 02:22:47.023
of years and my understanding
is that it&apos;s gained very little traction

02:22:47.023 --> 02:22:52.018
in that time, it does make sense
to use that money to develop a plan

02:22:52.018 --> 02:22:57.001
to cost and scope the work that&apos;s actually
recommended in the urban design framework,

02:22:57.001 --> 02:23:00.011
which the Torquay Town Centre project sits
under,

02:23:00.011 --> 02:23:03.007
so that the projects are shovel ready
and much better placed

02:23:03.007 --> 02:23:05.010
to attract future funding.

02:23:05.010 --> 02:23:09.013
The remaining $600,000
from this allocation would be reallocated

02:23:09.013 --> 02:23:11.016
to the Surf Coast Aquatic Centre.

02:23:11.016 --> 02:23:16.016
The second significant project nominated
to have funds reallocated from

02:23:16.016 --> 02:23:18.003
is Race Torquay.

02:23:18.003 --> 02:23:22.005
There is more than $160,000
sitting in the Adopted Strategy Reserve

02:23:22.005 --> 02:23:23.018
for this event.

02:23:23.018 --> 02:23:28.000
Yet it hasn&apos;t been held since 2020
and event organisers have given no

02:23:28.000 --> 02:23:31.024
commitment to Council that this event
will occur in future years.

02:23:31.024 --> 02:23:35.001
So it makes sense to allocate these funds
to a project which

02:23:35.001 --> 02:23:38.011
is currently a much higher priority.

02:23:38.011 --> 02:23:42.011
Just quickly, officers also reviewed
a number of projects on its program

02:23:42.011 --> 02:23:47.001
of projects and is able
to reallocate more than $250,000

02:23:47.001 --> 02:23:50.009
from projects that are either concluded or
no longer required.

02:23:50.009 --> 02:23:54.011
So essentially we have a range
of projects here that are either concluded

02:23:54.011 --> 02:23:57.020
, on hold or unlikely
to happen any time soon

02:23:57.020 --> 02:24:01.007
and it makes good sense
to reallocate that money to a project that

02:24:01.007 --> 02:24:04.007
is a current priority and needs more funds
to see it through.

02:24:04.007 --> 02:24:08.007
I hope my fellow Councillors agree
and that Council can make better use of

02:24:08.007 --> 02:24:12.011
more than $1 million currently sitting
in reserves awaiting a future.

02:24:12.011 --> 02:24:14.018
Thank you.

02:24:14.018 --> 02:24:16.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:24:16.005 --> 02:24:17.018
Councillor Schonfelder?

02:24:17.018 --> 02:24:19.005
No?

02:24:19.005 --> 02:24:21.005
Would any other Councillors like to speak?

02:24:21.005 --> 02:24:22.017
Councillor Allen.

02:24:22.017 --> 02:24:24.005
CR GARY ALLEN: Thanks, Mayor.

02:24:24.005 --> 02:24:29.022
Look, just to say I&apos;m keen that
of the $3.57 million shortfall that

02:24:29.022 --> 02:24:37.007
we don&apos;t obviously increase borrowings
by a cent, and this approach to me I&apos;m

02:24:37.007 --> 02:24:42.011
in favour of because it&apos;s taking
from Peter to pay Peter.

02:24:42.011 --> 02:24:45.012
So in other words, we&apos;re taking
from Torquay projects

02:24:45.012 --> 02:24:47.020
to fund a project that
is essentially going

02:24:47.020 --> 02:24:52.001
to benefit the Torquay industry community.

02:24:52.001 --> 02:24:57.009
We won&apos;t know until we see the result
of the tender process which we agreed

02:24:57.009 --> 02:25:00.019
to last month
to test the financial viability and

02:25:00.019 --> 02:25:04.018
whether we can afford to proceed
with the pool, but we must be

02:25:04.018 --> 02:25:10.009
- this motion makes us prepared
in case the tenders do come

02:25:10.009 --> 02:25:16.023
within the guidelines to move ahead
without borrowing and therefore I&apos;m

02:25:16.023 --> 02:25:21.017
in favour of having this strategy
in case we need to fund the pool

02:25:21.017 --> 02:25:23.005
in that sense.

02:25:23.005 --> 02:25:24.017
Thank you.

02:25:24.017 --> 02:25:26.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:25:26.005 --> 02:25:28.004
Councillor Wellington?

02:25:28.004 --> 02:25:29.019
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you.

02:25:29.019 --> 02:25:32.012
I won&apos;t be supporting this
because I don&apos;t support the pool

02:25:32.012 --> 02:25:36.021
- or I don&apos;t support an aquatic centre
costing almost $50 million being built.

02:25:36.021 --> 02:25:40.014
I think that we&apos;re living
beyond our means, very much

02:25:40.014 --> 02:25:42.002
beyond our means.

02:25:42.002 --> 02:25:44.019
There&apos;s already a lot
of Council money allocated towards

02:25:44.019 --> 02:25:48.007
that $46 million or $47 million that
we&apos;ve got.

02:25:48.007 --> 02:25:51.007
I suspect what we&apos;ll do
is we&apos;ll find (inaudible) all

02:25:53.008 --> 02:25:56.017
of a sudden we&apos;ll have the 46.8,
but that million is at the cost

02:25:56.017 --> 02:25:59.008
of other priorities as well and we&apos;ve got

02:25:59.008 --> 02:26:03.010
- analysis
of where we need a million dollars

02:26:03.010 --> 02:26:04.023
at the moment.

02:26:04.023 --> 02:26:09.023
Do we need it in a $47 million aquatic
centre or do we need it in roads

02:26:09.023 --> 02:26:15.017
and bridges and other infrastructure where
we&apos;ve got a massive asset gap?

02:26:15.017 --> 02:26:19.021
We&apos;re going
to create a (inaudible) really aren&apos;t able

02:26:19.021 --> 02:26:22.021
to keep up with the assets we&apos;ve got.

02:26:22.021 --> 02:26:25.000
So I feel very

02:26:25.000 --> 02:26:29.019
- and particularly to create an asset which
is going to have an ongoing drain

02:26:29.019 --> 02:26:34.021
on council and ratepayer funds every year
for the foreseeable future.

02:26:34.021 --> 02:26:37.001
So I just don&apos;t support it.

02:26:37.001 --> 02:26:39.013
It&apos;s convenient to find $1 million,
that&apos;s nice,

02:26:39.013 --> 02:26:45.023
but I think it would be much more
responsible to look at priorities

02:26:45.023 --> 02:26:53.019
across the shire and determine
whether a $47 million pool

02:26:53.019 --> 02:26:55.007
is really a priority.

02:26:55.007 --> 02:27:01.000
To me it&apos;s not,
so I won&apos;t be supporting it.

02:27:01.000 --> 02:27:02.021
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Barker?

02:27:02.021 --> 02:27:04.009
CR PAUL BARKER: Thanks, Mayor.

02:27:04.009 --> 02:27:06.003
Spending other people&apos;s money is fun.

02:27:06.003 --> 02:27:07.015
You don&apos;t have to work for it.

02:27:07.015 --> 02:27:09.009
You can throw it around like confetti.

02:27:09.009 --> 02:27:12.014
If it lands on an unaffordable project,
it&apos;s okay, you just find money

02:27:12.014 --> 02:27:14.001
from somewhere else.

02:27:14.001 --> 02:27:15.017
Is there a need for a pool in Torquay?

02:27:15.017 --> 02:27:17.005
Yes.

02:27:17.005 --> 02:27:20.013
Do we have tens of millions of dollars
of taxpayer money allocated to it?

02:27:20.013 --> 02:27:22.001
Yes.

02:27:22.001 --> 02:27:24.024
Has this stifled the development
of a privately developed pool

02:27:24.024 --> 02:27:26.012
from progressing?

02:27:26.012 --> 02:27:27.024
Most likely.

02:27:27.024 --> 02:27:31.013
Who in their right mind would raise
private capital when this project of ours

02:27:31.013 --> 02:27:33.000
is going ahead?

02:27:33.000 --> 02:27:34.013
No-one.

02:27:34.013 --> 02:27:37.014
Would a privately built pool be
better equipped for a lower spend?

02:27:37.014 --> 02:27:39.002
I think absolutely.

02:27:41.003 --> 02:27:44.005
You do whatever you want,
it&apos;s not your money, it&apos;s not mine either,

02:27:47.006 --> 02:27:49.021
but I think I&apos;m part of the minority voice
in this aspect,

02:27:49.021 --> 02:27:51.013
so vote the way you see fit.

02:27:53.019 --> 02:27:55.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:27:55.007 --> 02:27:57.024
Councillor Stapleton,
did you have any closing remarks?

02:27:57.024 --> 02:27:59.019
CR LIBBY STAPLETON: No, thanks, Mayor.

02:27:59.019 --> 02:28:02.000
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I put the motion
to the vote.

02:28:02.000 --> 02:28:03.012
All those in favour.

02:28:03.012 --> 02:28:05.000
Opposed.

02:28:05.000 --> 02:28:07.001
And the motion is carried.

02:28:07.001 --> 02:28:08.018
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: The vote was?

02:28:08.018 --> 02:28:10.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: 7-2.

02:28:10.005 --> 02:28:12.002
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you.

02:28:12.002 --> 02:28:17.015
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: We now move on to 4.8,
Planning Permit Application 22/0427

02:28:17.015 --> 02:28:19.022
Construction
of a telecommunications facility

02:28:19.022 --> 02:28:22.020
- 460 Grossmans Road Bellbrae.

02:28:22.020 --> 02:28:26.007
This report has been presented to Council
to determine a position

02:28:26.007 --> 02:28:31.020
on Planning Permit Application 22/0427
for the development

02:28:31.020 --> 02:28:36.023
of a telecommunications facility
at 460 Grossmans Road Bellbrae.

02:28:36.023 --> 02:28:38.011
Do I have a mover of the motion?

02:28:38.011 --> 02:28:39.023
Councillor Schonfelder

02:28:39.023 --> 02:28:41.011
- as per the recommendation?

02:28:41.011 --> 02:28:42.023
And do I have a seconder, please?

02:28:42.023 --> 02:28:44.011
Councillor Barker.

02:28:44.011 --> 02:28:45.023
Did you wish to speak?

02:28:45.023 --> 02:28:48.007
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: Yes, just briefly,
Mayor.

02:28:48.007 --> 02:28:50.023
I&apos;d just like
to say that the application seeks approval

02:28:50.023 --> 02:28:56.000
for the construction
of a 30 metre high concrete monopole tower

02:28:56.000 --> 02:29:02.014
on top of which is
to be installed an array of antennas

02:29:02.014 --> 02:29:09.015
for mobile phone communications reaching
a maximum overall height of 32.5 metres

02:29:09.015 --> 02:29:12.009
above ground level.

02:29:12.009 --> 02:29:17.006
The proposed tower is
to be sited in the north-east corner

02:29:17.006 --> 02:29:24.009
of the land approximately 55 metres south
of an existing telecommunications tower.

02:29:24.009 --> 02:29:29.022
It will be set back 77 metres
from Coombes Road, 29 metres

02:29:29.022 --> 02:29:35.015
from the east side boundary, and a minimum
of 37 metres from the southern boundary.

02:29:35.015 --> 02:29:40.007
The land to be developed
is currently grazing land.

02:29:40.007 --> 02:29:45.003
The tower and associated equipment cabinet
and compounds

02:29:45.003 --> 02:29:52.009
will occupy 73 square metres of area.

02:29:52.009 --> 02:30:01.000
And I&apos;d just like to add that I do use
my mobile phone often and

02:30:01.000 --> 02:30:07.023
like many other members of our community,
we do rely very much on telecommunications

02:30:07.023 --> 02:30:13.002
and having the most
updated infrastructure possible.

02:30:13.002 --> 02:30:14.015
Thank you, Mayor.

02:30:14.015 --> 02:30:16.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:30:16.002 --> 02:30:18.000
Councillor Barker, did you wish to speak?

02:30:18.000 --> 02:30:19.012
CR PAUL BARKER: Thanks, Mayor.

02:30:19.012 --> 02:30:22.005
A key strategy
for telecommunications infrastructure is

02:30:22.005 --> 02:30:25.008
to colocate telecommunications
facilities wherever practical.

02:30:25.008 --> 02:30:28.007
Victorian planning reports note
that carriers are encouraged

02:30:28.007 --> 02:30:30.009
to colocate facilities wherever practical.

02:30:30.009 --> 02:30:34.007
This provision encourages colocation where
an existing structure has the capacity

02:30:34.007 --> 02:30:35.021
to cope.

02:30:35.021 --> 02:30:39.023
I&apos;m not certain that all attempts
to colocate the infrastructure in question

02:30:39.023 --> 02:30:44.008
with this existing infrastructure
have been exhausted.

02:30:44.008 --> 02:30:48.018
I accept that if colocation were to occur,
it would result in a taller pole

02:30:48.018 --> 02:30:50.007
at the existing site.

02:30:50.007 --> 02:30:54.007
I think this would be a preferable
situation and set a precedent that

02:30:54.007 --> 02:30:57.024
all efforts must be made for colocation.

02:30:57.024 --> 02:31:00.018
Allowing this application
to pass may set a precedent that

02:31:00.018 --> 02:31:03.019
will result
in many more similar structures popping up

02:31:03.019 --> 02:31:05.009
around the shire.

02:31:05.009 --> 02:31:08.018
I appreciate the applicant&apos;s attempts
to meet the minimum requirements

02:31:08.018 --> 02:31:10.005
laid before them.

02:31:10.005 --> 02:31:13.001
I do not like the way this development
is planned to occur,

02:31:13.001 --> 02:31:17.015
though I think you should be able
to do what you want with your land so long

02:31:17.015 --> 02:31:20.003
as you aren&apos;t causing harm to others,
and in this light,

02:31:20.003 --> 02:31:22.011
I will be supporting the recommendation.

02:31:22.011 --> 02:31:25.008
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Would any
other Councillors like to speak

02:31:25.008 --> 02:31:26.021
to the motion?

02:31:26.021 --> 02:31:28.008
Councillor Bodsworth?

02:31:28.008 --> 02:31:30.015
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Just briefly, thanks,
Mayor.

02:31:30.015 --> 02:31:34.006
I share some
of Councillor Barker&apos;s misgivings.

02:31:34.006 --> 02:31:36.004
I&apos;m happy to support the motion.

02:31:36.004 --> 02:31:40.001
I just note that I&apos;m interested in

02:31:40.001 --> 02:31:47.005
- as a landscape architect, I&apos;m interested
in visual impact mitigation options.

02:31:47.005 --> 02:31:50.017
I drove up Coombes Road on the way
to tonight&apos;s Council meeting

02:31:50.017 --> 02:31:56.009
past the site where this monopole
is proposed and there&apos;s a combination

02:31:56.009 --> 02:32:01.021
of green power poles
and plain grey cement existing

02:32:01.021 --> 02:32:04.015
telecommunications tower which offer
an opportunity

02:32:04.015 --> 02:32:07.024
to compare the visual impact
of those two different colours

02:32:07.024 --> 02:32:11.003
and I don&apos;t believe there&apos;s a
substantial difference in the visual

02:32:11.003 --> 02:32:12.015
impact.

02:32:12.015 --> 02:32:16.008
But this is obviously not the last
of these proposals that we&apos;re going

02:32:16.008 --> 02:32:19.023
to get, so I think it&apos;s important
for us to do some

02:32:19.023 --> 02:32:24.012
- well, just to continue to stay in touch
with best practice

02:32:24.012 --> 02:32:29.010
in visual impact mitigation,
in electromagnetic emissions

02:32:29.010 --> 02:32:34.014
and in the other issues that were part
of this consideration tonight.

02:32:34.014 --> 02:32:37.005
So, yeah, I&apos;m happy
to support the recommendation,

02:32:37.005 --> 02:32:43.002
but I think these impacts are really
important and we need to do what we can

02:32:43.002 --> 02:32:45.017
to mitigate them on an ongoing basis.

02:32:45.017 --> 02:32:47.009
Thanks.

02:32:47.009 --> 02:32:48.021
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:32:48.021 --> 02:32:50.009
Councillor Wellington?

02:32:50.009 --> 02:32:53.009
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Yes,
can I just ask a couple of questions?

02:32:53.009 --> 02:32:59.021
On the east of that site
at 460 there&apos;s a parcel of land which

02:32:59.021 --> 02:33:02.011
is also (inaudible) on the corner
of Coombes Road

02:33:02.011 --> 02:33:06.016
and (inaudible) Road on the south-west
corner.

02:33:06.016 --> 02:33:09.009
I just wonder if somebody could tell me

02:33:09.009 --> 02:33:15.016
- as I understand it, the pole is proposed
to be located in the north-east corner

02:33:15.016 --> 02:33:19.007
of the subject land
and then there&apos;s another parcel of land

02:33:19.007 --> 02:33:24.001
next to it and another one south
of that adjacent to the public land

02:33:24.001 --> 02:33:26.020
and I just wondered if I can be told the

02:33:26.020 --> 02:33:30.007
- I was trying to find the size
of those blocks and

02:33:30.007 --> 02:33:32.003
whether or not they&apos;ve got homes on them.

02:33:35.016 --> 02:33:39.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: I&apos;ll pass that
through to you, CEO.

02:33:39.005 --> 02:33:44.016
ROBYN SEYMOUR: Councillor Wellington,
I can&apos;t give you the size of those blocks

02:33:44.016 --> 02:33:46.003
at this point.

02:33:46.003 --> 02:33:50.013
In terms of whether they&apos;ve got homes
on them, to be honest,

02:33:50.013 --> 02:33:54.009
I&apos;m not actually clear which blocks
you&apos;re talking about.

02:33:54.009 --> 02:34:00.009
I&apos;ll just check if the General Manager
of Place Making and Environment is clearer

02:34:00.009 --> 02:34:02.016
on those blocks of land for you.

02:34:06.013 --> 02:34:08.001
CHRIS PIKE: Yes, through

02:34:08.001 --> 02:34:10.023
- CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: Sorry,
I was just going to say, Mayor,

02:34:10.023 --> 02:34:17.005
on page 207, point number 5 is helpful
in this regard.

02:34:17.005 --> 02:34:19.022
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you,
Councillor Schonfelder.

02:34:19.022 --> 02:34:23.001
CHRIS PIKE: Yes, through the Mayor,
I was going to point to that image

02:34:23.001 --> 02:34:26.000
on the top of page 208.

02:34:26.000 --> 02:34:34.004
Certainly the smaller block to the south,
if you like, does have a residence on it

02:34:34.004 --> 02:34:40.007
and that&apos;s referenced in the analysis
of the potential impacts

02:34:40.007 --> 02:34:41.020
of the pole being sited there.

02:34:41.020 --> 02:34:47.012
There is a property to the east too,
and likewise that&apos;s addressed

02:34:47.012 --> 02:34:49.000
in the report.

02:34:49.000 --> 02:34:53.011
I too don&apos;t have the information
on the size of the parcels.

02:34:53.011 --> 02:34:54.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:34:54.023 --> 02:34:57.016
Councillor Wellington, do you wish
to speak to the motion?

02:34:57.016 --> 02:34:59.004
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Yes.

02:34:59.004 --> 02:35:00.016
Look, so I&apos;ve just

02:35:00.016 --> 02:35:05.017
- I can see there&apos;s farming zone land
to the east

02:35:05.017 --> 02:35:10.010
of this property which I presume would
be separate ownership, but I don&apos;t know.

02:35:10.010 --> 02:35:14.008
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Wellington,
I&apos;ll just let you know the clock started

02:35:14.008 --> 02:35:17.012
because I did ask if you were speaking,
so are you speaking currently

02:35:17.012 --> 02:35:19.000
to the motion or are you

02:35:19.000 --> 02:35:21.000
- CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;m speaking, yes.

02:35:21.000 --> 02:35:22.013
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Great.

02:35:22.013 --> 02:35:24.002
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you.

02:35:24.002 --> 02:35:26.020
So in looking at this, it seems
to me there&apos;s farm zone land,

02:35:26.020 --> 02:35:29.005
parcel (inaudible) Coombes Road,
there&apos;s a parcel

02:35:29.005 --> 02:35:30.018
of farming zone land just south

02:35:30.018 --> 02:35:32.005
- just to the south of that.

02:35:32.005 --> 02:35:35.013
There&apos;s a lot of rural or low-density
residential zone land around this

02:35:35.013 --> 02:35:42.016
and it&apos;s very close to Kithbrooke
and various other sort of low-density

02:35:42.016 --> 02:35:44.017
residential developments.

02:35:44.017 --> 02:35:48.005
I&apos;m really concerned just
about the fact that (inaudible).

02:35:58.007 --> 02:36:03.006
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Wellington,
your internet is becoming very unstable

02:36:03.006 --> 02:36:05.021
and we can&apos;t actually hear what you&apos;re
saying.

02:36:05.021 --> 02:36:08.005
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: (Inaudible) support
that.

02:36:08.005 --> 02:36:13.003
I agree totally with Councillor Barker
what he says there (inaudible).

02:36:13.003 --> 02:36:14.018
Can I turn my video off for a moment?

02:36:14.018 --> 02:36:16.005
Is that better?

02:36:16.005 --> 02:36:17.018
Can you hear me?

02:36:17.018 --> 02:36:19.014
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Yes, that&apos;s better.

02:36:19.014 --> 02:36:23.003
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I&apos;ll just leave it
off for a moment, if you don&apos;t mind.

02:36:23.003 --> 02:36:27.000
So I agree entirely with Councillor Barker
that the duplication of infrastructure

02:36:27.000 --> 02:36:30.000
is just absolutely appalling and
will just create, you know,

02:36:30.000 --> 02:36:32.021
massive visual impact on the environment.

02:36:32.021 --> 02:36:36.023
I know there&apos;s a lot of infrastructure
in this sort of area already,

02:36:36.023 --> 02:36:39.019
but
if there&apos;s unnecessary additional

02:36:39.019 --> 02:36:41.022
infrastructure, then I don&apos;t support it.

02:36:41.022 --> 02:36:48.013
I&apos;m just not convinced about the location
of this and I&apos;m not sure about the impact

02:36:48.013 --> 02:36:50.017
on that land that&apos;s adjacent to it.

02:36:50.017 --> 02:36:53.021
To me it&apos;s very close to the boundary.

02:36:53.021 --> 02:36:59.013
That land is small
and probably not suitable for, you know,

02:36:59.013 --> 02:37:02.021
a commercial farming enterprise
and the parcel of land to the south

02:37:02.021 --> 02:37:06.009
of that corner
next to the public use farmland

02:37:06.009 --> 02:37:10.003
is also fairly small
and still zone farming zone.

02:37:10.003 --> 02:37:14.005
So it just is potentially going
to leave some orphan land

02:37:14.005 --> 02:37:17.011
in that corner that won&apos;t be very useful
for much because it

02:37:17.011 --> 02:37:21.019
will be very closely adjacent
to a telecommunications facility.

02:37:21.019 --> 02:37:23.007
I don&apos;t think I can support.

02:37:23.007 --> 02:37:26.018
And I know there&apos;s a lot
of community unrest about this, a lot

02:37:26.018 --> 02:37:30.007
of submissions made about it,
although I think only one person attended

02:37:30.007 --> 02:37:34.019
the hearing of submissions,
but I&apos;m sympathetic to those submissions

02:37:34.019 --> 02:37:36.024
and I don&apos;t think I
will support this proposal.

02:37:36.024 --> 02:37:38.011
Thank you.

02:37:41.006 --> 02:37:42.019
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:37:42.019 --> 02:37:45.013
Councillor Schonfelder,
did you have any closing remarks?

02:37:45.013 --> 02:37:47.001
No.

02:37:47.001 --> 02:37:48.013
We&apos;ll put the motion to the vote.

02:37:48.013 --> 02:37:50.001
All those in favour

02:37:50.001 --> 02:37:51.013
- sorry, Gary, did you want to

02:37:51.013 --> 02:37:54.016
- and also, Councillor Wellington,
you&apos;ll need to put your video on

02:37:54.016 --> 02:37:56.003
before we vote.

02:37:56.003 --> 02:37:57.018
CR GARY ALLEN: Yes, thanks, Mayor.

02:37:57.018 --> 02:37:59.015
Again, I&apos;m a bit conflicted about this.

02:37:59.015 --> 02:38:03.009
I&apos;m very sympathetic
to the Kithbrooke Retirement Village

02:38:03.009 --> 02:38:09.002
people who submitted to us, just adding
to the terrible visual pollution

02:38:09.002 --> 02:38:10.015
that exists in that area.

02:38:14.005 --> 02:38:17.011
I understand it&apos;s probably well
within the planning laws

02:38:17.011 --> 02:38:23.001
and therefore perhaps there&apos;s little
we can do about it, but I think

02:38:23.001 --> 02:38:27.015
on principle I&apos;m really opposed
to this ad hoc siting

02:38:27.015 --> 02:38:34.007
of telecommunications poles,
so I think I&apos;ll vote against the motion.

02:38:34.007 --> 02:38:36.024
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:38:36.024 --> 02:38:38.012
We&apos;ve already talked about

02:38:38.012 --> 02:38:40.005
- great, okay.

02:38:40.005 --> 02:38:41.017
All those in favour

02:38:41.017 --> 02:38:43.005
- we&apos;ll put the motion to a vote.

02:38:43.005 --> 02:38:45.007
All those in favour.

02:38:45.007 --> 02:38:46.019
All those opposed.

02:38:49.001 --> 02:38:51.015
And the motion is carried 6-3.

02:38:57.004 --> 02:39:02.003
The next item we have is 4.9,
Community Project Development Program

02:39:02.003 --> 02:39:04.008
- March 2023 Update.

02:39:04.008 --> 02:39:09.023
I&apos;d like to note that I am declaring
an interest in item 4.9 as point 2

02:39:09.023 --> 02:39:13.001
of the recommendation requests
that Council note a matter related

02:39:13.001 --> 02:39:16.015
to the Jan Juc kindergarten bike shed
proposal as my brother-in-law

02:39:16.015 --> 02:39:18.005
has a key role in the project.

02:39:18.005 --> 02:39:21.021
I will not be declaring a conflict
of interest tonight because this

02:39:21.021 --> 02:39:23.009
is just for noting.

02:39:23.009 --> 02:39:26.009
However, when the item is presented
for decision at a later date,

02:39:26.009 --> 02:39:28.009
I will declare a conflict
of interest then.

02:39:28.009 --> 02:39:30.019
So the purpose of this report is
to provide Council

02:39:30.019 --> 02:39:33.023
with the quarterly Community Project
Development Program update.

02:39:33.023 --> 02:39:35.011
Do we have a mover of a motion?

02:39:35.011 --> 02:39:36.023
Councillor Allen

02:39:36.023 --> 02:39:38.011
- is it as per the recommendation?

02:39:38.011 --> 02:39:40.019
CR GARY ALLEN: As per the recommendation,
Mayor.

02:39:40.019 --> 02:39:42.021
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And do we have
a seconder?

02:39:42.021 --> 02:39:44.009
Councillor Hodge.

02:39:44.009 --> 02:39:46.014
And would you like to speak,
Councillor Allen?

02:39:46.014 --> 02:39:48.001
CR GARY ALLEN: Thanks, Mayor.

02:39:48.001 --> 02:39:51.015
The Community Project Development Program
is driven from community ideas,

02:39:51.015 --> 02:39:54.007
with the Council helping
through investigation support

02:39:54.007 --> 02:39:55.019
and finally approval.

02:39:55.019 --> 02:39:59.003
In the March quarterly update,
we are affirming the feasibility

02:39:59.003 --> 02:40:02.013
of the Deans Marsh
community streetscape proposal,

02:40:02.013 --> 02:40:06.015
referring the Jan Juc Kindergarten bike
shelter program to the June meeting

02:40:06.015 --> 02:40:10.016
to allow for further investigation,
and moving three proposals

02:40:10.016 --> 02:40:14.003
into the investigation phase.

02:40:14.003 --> 02:40:19.009
The Deans Marsh and District community
is a very dynamic, proactive community

02:40:19.009 --> 02:40:23.000
with the Deans Marsh
and District Community Action Plan being

02:40:23.000 --> 02:40:28.015
formulated in late 2019 through what
is affectionately known

02:40:28.015 --> 02:40:31.021
as the mad cap process.

02:40:31.021 --> 02:40:34.022
The actions identified
in mad cap were delayed due

02:40:34.022 --> 02:40:37.015
to the impacts of COVID.

02:40:37.015 --> 02:40:41.020
However, it&apos;s great
to see the reactivation of the plan

02:40:41.020 --> 02:40:44.010
through the streetscape proposal.

02:40:44.010 --> 02:40:49.000
One of three actions
in priority 2 our local environment

02:40:49.000 --> 02:40:54.020
and this recommendation tonight
affirms its feasibility.

02:40:54.020 --> 02:41:00.021
The plan includes principally avenue
plantings, an art and heritage trail,

02:41:00.021 --> 02:41:03.024
and township entry signage.

02:41:03.024 --> 02:41:08.007
Because of the demonstrated level
of community commitment to the proposal,

02:41:08.007 --> 02:41:11.018
element working groups
will start their detailed planning,

02:41:11.018 --> 02:41:14.022
which includes funding strategies.

02:41:14.022 --> 02:41:20.001
Congratulations to the streetscapers,
a committed group who have worked

02:41:20.001 --> 02:41:23.018
with Council officers
and a landscape architect

02:41:23.018 --> 02:41:28.008
to progress high-level ideas and
to identify any site or project

02:41:28.008 --> 02:41:29.023
constraints.

02:41:29.023 --> 02:41:33.016
This group will be the catalyst
to drive the proposal forward,

02:41:33.016 --> 02:41:37.016
with detailed planning and design work.

02:41:37.016 --> 02:41:40.014
It is also pleasing
to note that three proposals now move

02:41:40.014 --> 02:41:42.001
into the investigation phase

02:41:42.001 --> 02:41:46.011
- namely, the upgrade
to the Stribling Reserve Cricket Nets,

02:41:46.011 --> 02:41:49.014
netting behind the goalposts
at the north end

02:41:49.014 --> 02:41:54.003
of the Polwarth Oval Torquay, and lighting
for the Winchelsea Bowls Club.

02:41:56.007 --> 02:41:58.010
I have knowledge
of the cricket nets proposal

02:41:58.010 --> 02:42:02.016
at Stribling Reserve Lorne,
which I strongly support.

02:42:02.016 --> 02:42:06.017
It is great to see the revival
of the cricket club at Lorne

02:42:06.017 --> 02:42:11.024
after several years in recess,
with special thanks to Darren Balderas

02:42:11.024 --> 02:42:14.020
and his band of volunteers.

02:42:14.020 --> 02:42:19.013
It was a really special experience to be
at a Friday night cricket match

02:42:19.013 --> 02:42:21.007
in Lorne under lights

02:42:21.007 --> 02:42:24.006
- and unlike the Gabba, they didn&apos;t fail

02:42:24.006 --> 02:42:33.015
- with several hundred people enjoying
the game and the joy of seeing the revival

02:42:33.015 --> 02:42:37.023
of the club going against the trend
of many sporting clubs

02:42:37.023 --> 02:42:41.007
in smaller rural townships.

02:42:41.007 --> 02:42:45.015
Polwarth Oval netting
to stop lengthy retrieval of footballs

02:42:45.015 --> 02:42:50.009
is important for the fluency of the game
and the protection of the surrounds.

02:42:50.009 --> 02:42:55.001
And lights at the Winchelsea Bowls Club
will extend the amenity of the facility to

02:42:55.001 --> 02:43:01.008
all in the community, with extended hours
of play being possible, and I expect it

02:43:01.008 --> 02:43:05.008
will place the club in a position
to capitalise

02:43:05.008 --> 02:43:08.007
on the expected increased interest
in bowls generated

02:43:08.007 --> 02:43:11.013
by the Commonwealth Games,
which certainly was the experience

02:43:11.013 --> 02:43:13.000
in Manchester

02:43:13.000 --> 02:43:14.017
- Manchester, or Birmingham?

02:43:14.017 --> 02:43:16.005
Birmingham.

02:43:16.005 --> 02:43:19.015
It certainly was the experience
in Birmingham, probably Manchester too.

02:43:19.015 --> 02:43:24.010
So I have much pleasure
in moving the recommendation.

02:43:24.010 --> 02:43:26.018
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you,
Councillor Allen.

02:43:26.018 --> 02:43:28.006
Councillor Hodge.

02:43:28.006 --> 02:43:31.002
CR ROSE HODGE: Well, I think it&apos;s
all been covered, actually.

02:43:31.002 --> 02:43:34.007
But one thing great about this,
we&apos;ve got great officers that work out

02:43:34.007 --> 02:43:37.003
with the community
and you see the volunteers coming forward

02:43:37.003 --> 02:43:39.020
and putting forward their ideas of what
they want and then

02:43:39.020 --> 02:43:42.016
they can help go fund part of it
and it&apos;s absolute ownership.

02:43:42.016 --> 02:43:46.017
So congratulations to Deans Marsh,
great to see that is moving on, and we

02:43:46.017 --> 02:43:48.005
all saw

02:43:48.005 --> 02:43:51.002
- many of us went up to Deans Marsh
on Sunday for their festival.

02:43:51.002 --> 02:43:52.018
What a fantastic community that is.

02:43:52.018 --> 02:43:55.024
But to see Lorne and Torquay
and Winchelsea all involved

02:43:55.024 --> 02:43:59.013
with their volunteers
of these clubs getting together,

02:43:59.013 --> 02:44:02.013
putting forward what they want, working
with our officers,

02:44:02.013 --> 02:44:06.005
it&apos;s a great relationship we have
with these volunteers of these great clubs

02:44:06.005 --> 02:44:08.023
and I recommend the report.

02:44:08.023 --> 02:44:10.010
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:44:10.010 --> 02:44:13.001
Would any other Councillors wish to speak
to the motion?

02:44:13.001 --> 02:44:14.013
Councillor Wellington.

02:44:14.013 --> 02:44:18.006
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Yes, I&apos;d just like
to say the Winchelsea Bowls lighting,

02:44:18.006 --> 02:44:23.015
as Councillor Allen mentioned,
I do think bowls has been

02:44:23.015 --> 02:44:25.009
becoming increasingly popular.

02:44:25.009 --> 02:44:28.008
It&apos;s attracting a younger group,
which is what&apos;s happening out

02:44:28.008 --> 02:44:33.011
at Winchelsea, and I think it
will only continue to grow

02:44:33.011 --> 02:44:35.006
and particularly as Winchelsea grows.

02:44:35.006 --> 02:44:38.014
So I think we need to look
at the facilities those clubs have,

02:44:38.014 --> 02:44:41.019
not just their lighting but the quality
of other facilities.

02:44:41.019 --> 02:44:43.006
They&apos;re certainly not as good

02:44:43.006 --> 02:44:47.016
- I think the quality is not as good
as some other sports around the district,

02:44:47.016 --> 02:44:52.018
like potentially basketball, et cetera,
have got really good facilities.

02:44:52.018 --> 02:44:56.004
But the bowls club I think need
to be (inaudible) and

02:44:56.004 --> 02:45:00.022
they are becoming increasingly popular,
so I&apos;m pleased to see that project funded.

02:45:00.022 --> 02:45:03.009
Thank you.

02:45:03.009 --> 02:45:04.022
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:45:04.022 --> 02:45:06.009
Councillor Barker?

02:45:06.009 --> 02:45:07.022
CR PAUL BARKER: Thanks, Mayor.

02:45:07.022 --> 02:45:09.009
We&apos;re heading into a recession.

02:45:09.009 --> 02:45:13.003
Hundreds of rate paying, working families
in our shire are struggling to put food

02:45:13.003 --> 02:45:14.016
on the table.

02:45:14.016 --> 02:45:17.007
Many of the projects listed here generally
sound, sure.

02:45:17.007 --> 02:45:20.019
But in the current financial climate,
I don&apos;t think so.

02:45:20.019 --> 02:45:23.017
I think this is discretionary spending
that needs to be halted.

02:45:23.017 --> 02:45:26.020
I&apos;d prefer to see greater fundraising
from the community to pay

02:45:26.020 --> 02:45:28.008
for these sorts of items.

02:45:28.008 --> 02:45:32.002
All of these commitments of thousands,
tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands

02:45:32.002 --> 02:45:34.008
of dollars add up to millions of dollars.

02:45:34.008 --> 02:45:37.011
If you want to carry on like business
as usual, that&apos;s your choice.

02:45:37.011 --> 02:45:40.004
I know we&apos;re only at the start
of widespread financial pain

02:45:40.004 --> 02:45:41.017
over coming decades.

02:45:41.017 --> 02:45:43.020
With all
of mainland Australia&apos;s states now

02:45:43.020 --> 02:45:46.023
governed by big spenders
and supposedly financial conservatives

02:45:46.023 --> 02:45:49.024
dwindling in relevance,
you can be sure financially responsible

02:45:49.024 --> 02:45:51.011
governance is a long way off.

02:45:55.004 --> 02:46:00.018
There&apos;s just so much to address here.

02:46:00.018 --> 02:46:04.008
I know I&apos;m in the minority,
so you vote the way you do

02:46:04.008 --> 02:46:06.013
and I&apos;ll vote the way I do.

02:46:06.013 --> 02:46:08.001
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:46:08.001 --> 02:46:10.016
Councillor Allen,
did you have any closing statements?

02:46:10.016 --> 02:46:12.013
CR GARY ALLEN: Just a couple of comments.

02:46:12.013 --> 02:46:15.021
I think what is often overlooked
with government spending at all levels

02:46:15.021 --> 02:46:20.013
is the multiplier effect of that spending,
that it has generating income

02:46:20.013 --> 02:46:24.023
and employment throughout the community
and it does put food on the plates

02:46:24.023 --> 02:46:28.002
of workers and their families.

02:46:28.002 --> 02:46:35.014
The effect of this spending is widespread
and is directly related to the ability

02:46:35.014 --> 02:46:42.008
of people to consume or to spend,
influencing that multiplier effect,

02:46:42.008 --> 02:46:43.020
but it&apos;s real.

02:46:46.012 --> 02:46:52.015
Talking about the Winchelsea Bowls Club,
Councillor Wellington raised the issue

02:46:52.015 --> 02:46:54.020
of the expansion of the club.

02:46:54.020 --> 02:46:59.011
I think bowls
is really an intergenerational sport

02:46:59.011 --> 02:47:04.021
and it&apos;s gender neutral, so in
all those aspects it&apos;s just fantastic

02:47:04.021 --> 02:47:08.006
that you&apos;ve got a 20-year-old
bowling with an 85-year-old,

02:47:10.017 --> 02:47:12.007
no matter what the gender.

02:47:12.007 --> 02:47:17.016
So what we can do to enhance bowling
within our communities I think

02:47:17.016 --> 02:47:20.002
is a very positive thing.

02:47:20.002 --> 02:47:21.014
Thank you.

02:47:21.014 --> 02:47:23.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:47:23.002 --> 02:47:25.008
All those in favour.

02:47:25.008 --> 02:47:27.007
Opposed.

02:47:27.007 --> 02:47:28.021
And the motion is carried 8-1.

02:47:32.008 --> 02:47:35.008
Now we move on to 4.10,
Community Asset Committee Changes

02:47:35.008 --> 02:47:36.021
to Membership

02:47:36.021 --> 02:47:39.007
- Anderson Roadknight Reserve,
Anglesea Bike Park,

02:47:39.007 --> 02:47:40.019
and Connewarre Reserve.

02:47:40.019 --> 02:47:43.013
The recommendation
for this report requests that Council

02:47:43.013 --> 02:47:46.022
accept the resignation of members
from the Anderson Roadknight Reserve

02:47:46.022 --> 02:47:50.011
and Anglesea Bike Club Community Asset
Committees and appoints new members

02:47:50.011 --> 02:47:53.005
to these committees as well as
to the Connewarre Reserve

02:47:53.005 --> 02:47:54.020
Community Asset Committee.

02:47:54.020 --> 02:47:56.008
Do we have a mover of a motion?

02:47:56.008 --> 02:47:57.020
Councillor Bodsworth

02:47:57.020 --> 02:47:59.008
- as per the recommendation?

02:47:59.008 --> 02:48:00.020
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Yes.

02:48:00.020 --> 02:48:02.011
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And a seconder?

02:48:02.011 --> 02:48:03.023
Councillor Barker.

02:48:03.023 --> 02:48:06.005
And Councillor Bodsworth, do you wish
to speak?

02:48:06.005 --> 02:48:08.000
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Yes, thanks, Mayor.

02:48:08.000 --> 02:48:10.008
In the interests of time, I&apos;d just like
to thank all

02:48:10.008 --> 02:48:15.023
of our community asset committee members
past, present and future,

02:48:15.023 --> 02:48:19.011
including the people listed in our report,
but I&apos;d particularly like

02:48:19.011 --> 02:48:26.022
to acknowledge Ari Lingam&apos;s contribution
as the driving force behind the creation

02:48:26.022 --> 02:48:32.012
of the Anglesea Bike Park,
which was completed in 2006.

02:48:32.012 --> 02:48:36.021
I think it&apos;s pretty fair to say that
if it wasn&apos;t for Ari&apos;s advocacy

02:48:36.021 --> 02:48:40.007
and tenacity on that,
the bike park wouldn&apos;t exist and

02:48:40.007 --> 02:48:47.003
in that time, in that 16-odd years,
it&apos;s brought so much joy to so many people

02:48:47.003 --> 02:48:51.023
as well as being a significant part
of Anglesea&apos;s attractiveness to visitors.

02:48:51.023 --> 02:48:57.008
So a special shoutout to Ari
and great appreciation

02:48:57.008 --> 02:48:59.004
to the other people mentioned.

02:48:59.004 --> 02:49:01.004
Thanks.

02:49:01.004 --> 02:49:02.017
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:49:02.017 --> 02:49:05.006
Councillor Barker, did you want to speak
to the motion?

02:49:05.006 --> 02:49:06.018
CR PAUL BARKER: No, thanks.

02:49:06.018 --> 02:49:08.006
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No?

02:49:08.006 --> 02:49:09.018
Councillor Hodge?

02:49:09.018 --> 02:49:13.012
CR ROSE HODGE: Just very, very quickly,
I want to reiterate Councillor Bodsworth

02:49:13.012 --> 02:49:16.001
on Ari and the other people as well,
but I remember it was

02:49:16.001 --> 02:49:18.007
in December 2006 when that bike path was
opened.

02:49:18.007 --> 02:49:22.018
It was my first event as Mayor and it was
about 110 degrees,

02:49:22.018 --> 02:49:27.007
I remember it very well,
and Ari was a shining star then and

02:49:27.007 --> 02:49:32.000
he still was and he was a huge driver
in that area and has continued.

02:49:32.000 --> 02:49:34.014
So could you please pass
on my personal thanks to him too

02:49:34.014 --> 02:49:40.005
for being there for me for my first event
and also the great work that he&apos;s given,

02:49:40.005 --> 02:49:41.017
it&apos;s really been great.

02:49:44.009 --> 02:49:47.011
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Did you have
any closing remarks, Councillor

02:49:47.011 --> 02:49:49.018
- sorry, Councillor Wellington?

02:49:49.018 --> 02:49:51.008
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you.

02:49:51.008 --> 02:49:56.015
Sorry, I just wanted to briefly say thank
you to those volunteers that have retired

02:49:56.015 --> 02:50:01.019
and to all the volunteers who run these
committees and facilities for us.

02:50:01.019 --> 02:50:05.001
I&apos;m deeply disappointed
to see that we still require them all

02:50:05.001 --> 02:50:07.018
to do a Working With Children check.

02:50:07.018 --> 02:50:11.022
It&apos;s not a good policy
and it&apos;s a bureaucratic barrier put

02:50:11.022 --> 02:50:13.014
in people&apos;s way.

02:50:13.014 --> 02:50:15.010
There&apos;s a cost to it.

02:50:15.010 --> 02:50:17.005
It is clear that it&apos;s not good practice.

02:50:17.005 --> 02:50:20.011
You only should do Working
with Children checks when people actually

02:50:20.011 --> 02:50:23.009
have some realistic prospect
of working with children and many

02:50:23.009 --> 02:50:24.022
of these people do not.

02:50:24.022 --> 02:50:28.011
Obviously some of them would,
some of our communities would, but many

02:50:28.011 --> 02:50:31.017
of them do not and it&apos;s very poor practice
and I&apos;m very disappointed

02:50:31.017 --> 02:50:33.005
to see it&apos;s still there.

02:50:33.005 --> 02:50:38.006
But I hope it doesn&apos;t dissuade some
volunteers from continuing to come forward

02:50:38.006 --> 02:50:41.000
to do this important job.

02:50:41.000 --> 02:50:42.017
Thank you.

02:50:42.017 --> 02:50:44.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:50:44.005 --> 02:50:46.010
Councillor Bodsworth,
do you have any closing?

02:50:46.010 --> 02:50:48.004
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: No, thanks, Mayor.

02:50:48.004 --> 02:50:50.015
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: We&apos;ll put the motion
to the vote.

02:50:50.015 --> 02:50:52.003
All those in favour.

02:50:52.003 --> 02:50:53.023
And the motion is carried unanimously.

02:50:53.023 --> 02:50:58.007
We now move on to Review of SCS-004
Place Naming Policy.

02:50:58.007 --> 02:51:02.005
This report seeks Council&apos;s endorsement
for the draft Place Naming Policy

02:51:02.005 --> 02:51:04.001
to be placed on public exhibition.

02:51:04.001 --> 02:51:05.013
Do I have a mover?

02:51:05.013 --> 02:51:07.001
Councillor Schonfelder.

02:51:07.001 --> 02:51:08.013
And a seconder?

02:51:08.013 --> 02:51:10.001
Councillor Allen.

02:51:10.001 --> 02:51:11.015
Did you wish to speak to the motion?

02:51:11.015 --> 02:51:14.015
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: I&apos;ll just speak
very briefly and say that

02:51:14.015 --> 02:51:17.023
since being elected,
I&apos;ve been really heartened

02:51:17.023 --> 02:51:23.022
by the measures that we&apos;ve taken
as a Council towards reconciliation

02:51:23.022 --> 02:51:26.023
and I&apos;ve actually heard back
from many members

02:51:26.023 --> 02:51:32.020
of the community who are very enthusiastic
about us and they believe the time

02:51:32.020 --> 02:51:42.013
is right to forward the progress of trying
to achieve reconciliation.

02:51:42.013 --> 02:51:49.004
And I know that this policy is a review
of place naming and recently, Mayor,

02:51:49.004 --> 02:51:55.023
I visited relatives overseas and I went
to the museum of the City of New York

02:51:55.023 --> 02:52:00.005
and I learnt that Manhattan
is actually the native American Indian

02:52:00.005 --> 02:52:05.007
name for Manhattan Island
and I was really heartened by that,

02:52:05.007 --> 02:52:12.023
and I know that many of our areas
within our shire have Aboriginal names

02:52:12.023 --> 02:52:18.007
and there are also names
of areas that have English or

02:52:18.007 --> 02:52:23.007
non-Aboriginal names and I know as a part
of the reconciliation process

02:52:23.007 --> 02:52:25.006
we&apos;re addressing that.

02:52:25.006 --> 02:52:27.005
So I welcome this review.

02:52:27.005 --> 02:52:28.017
Thank you, Mayor.

02:52:28.017 --> 02:52:30.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:52:30.005 --> 02:52:31.017
Councillor Allen?

02:52:31.017 --> 02:52:33.005
CR GARY ALLEN: Thanks, Mayor.

02:52:33.005 --> 02:52:34.023
We&apos;re combining two policies into one

02:52:34.023 --> 02:52:39.003
- namely, the place making policy
with the plaque and memorials policy.

02:52:39.003 --> 02:52:42.010
If the recommendation is passed,
this draft policy will be put out

02:52:42.010 --> 02:52:46.021
to the community for four weeks
to seek feedback.

02:52:46.021 --> 02:52:49.023
Now, whilst not wishing
to comment specifically about any element

02:52:49.023 --> 02:52:54.023
of the policy, I was reminded a little bit
of the policy when I recently conducted

02:52:54.023 --> 02:52:59.021
a tour of the Lorne cemetery
for the Lorne Historical Society.

02:52:59.021 --> 02:53:03.014
The old cemetery was a variety
of memorials both colourful

02:53:03.014 --> 02:53:09.008
in their design and
with the stories also colourful, compared

02:53:09.008 --> 02:53:13.013
to the recent Lawn Cemetery,
that&apos;s L-A-W-N Cemetery,

02:53:13.013 --> 02:53:19.006
with admittedly the same colourful stories
but with the standard memorials.

02:53:19.006 --> 02:53:23.019
And I thought we are regulated in life
and now we are regulated and controlled

02:53:23.019 --> 02:53:25.007
in death.

02:53:31.012 --> 02:53:35.011
The Lorne community were recently told
they could not name a seat

02:53:35.011 --> 02:53:40.017
after an individual or have a wall
to remember those whose ashes have been

02:53:40.017 --> 02:53:42.010
scattered at sea.

02:53:42.010 --> 02:53:47.015
Now, this was not a Council regulation,
but it was a regulation

02:53:47.015 --> 02:53:56.001
by a similar authority
with ever increasing power over our lives.

02:53:56.001 --> 02:54:00.017
I&apos;ll be very interested to look
at the policy feedback that we receive

02:54:00.017 --> 02:54:03.014
by putting this draft out
for consultation.

02:54:03.014 --> 02:54:05.017
Thank you.

02:54:05.017 --> 02:54:07.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:54:07.005 --> 02:54:08.017
Councillor Wellington?

02:54:08.017 --> 02:54:11.002
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I just had
a quick question.

02:54:11.002 --> 02:54:21.020
As I read this proposal for names of roads
and other infrastructure,

02:54:21.020 --> 02:54:23.007
it could be traditional owner

02:54:23.007 --> 02:54:28.000
- you know, Indigenous names or
they could be other names.

02:54:28.000 --> 02:54:32.006
There&apos;s no compulsion
to name every street in the shire

02:54:32.006 --> 02:54:34.010
after Indigenous persons, is there?

02:54:34.010 --> 02:54:37.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No,
that&apos;s not the case.

02:54:37.016 --> 02:54:39.009
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Okay, thanks.

02:54:39.009 --> 02:54:42.023
The reason I asked that is
because I&apos;ve been told in Winchelsea that

02:54:42.023 --> 02:54:46.016
for some reason people associated
with new development had the impression

02:54:46.016 --> 02:54:50.006
that officers were saying to them that
they could only put forward Indigenous

02:54:50.006 --> 02:54:54.008
names and they didn&apos;t understand that
and it doesn&apos;t seem to be associated

02:54:54.008 --> 02:54:55.021
with any

02:54:55.021 --> 02:54:59.014
- well, certainly I don&apos;t believe that
the new developments

02:54:59.014 --> 02:55:03.016
of which I&apos;m aware have been compelled
to use Indigenous names

02:55:03.016 --> 02:55:05.003
and I think it&apos;s appropriate

02:55:05.003 --> 02:55:07.017
- I mean, I live in a place
with an Indigenous name,

02:55:07.017 --> 02:55:11.024
but it&apos;s certainly there in the mix
principally, which I see

02:55:11.024 --> 02:55:13.011
as being appropriate.

02:55:13.011 --> 02:55:19.020
But I wouldn&apos;t like to think we would sort
of implement a requirement that no

02:55:19.020 --> 02:55:23.001
other names were acceptable or appropriate

02:55:23.001 --> 02:55:25.020
So I just wanted
to clarify that this policy didn&apos;t do

02:55:25.020 --> 02:55:27.007
that.

02:55:27.007 --> 02:55:32.007
I&apos;ll be interested in the feedback
on this.

02:55:32.007 --> 02:55:35.015
There&apos;s obviously a lot of people
in communities (inaudible) you walk

02:55:35.015 --> 02:55:39.015
around the cemeteries, but you only need
to talk to people in small towns

02:55:39.015 --> 02:55:41.018
and you&apos;ll get the names
and family histories

02:55:41.018 --> 02:55:44.020
and the incredible contributions people
have made over the years

02:55:44.020 --> 02:55:48.003
and it&apos;s right that those people should
continue to be recognised.

02:55:48.003 --> 02:55:51.018
As long as we&apos;re not somehow precluding
that through this policy,

02:55:51.018 --> 02:55:56.010
which it didn&apos;t read to me as if we were,
but I was surprised to hear that feedback.

02:55:56.010 --> 02:55:59.018
However, I&apos;m happy for it to go out
to community and I&apos;ll make sure it goes

02:55:59.018 --> 02:56:05.002
to the people who gave me that feedback
and just see what their view on it is.

02:56:05.002 --> 02:56:06.015
Thank you.

02:56:06.015 --> 02:56:08.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:56:08.002 --> 02:56:10.022
Councillor Schonfelder,
did you have any closing remarks?

02:56:10.022 --> 02:56:12.015
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: No, thank you.

02:56:12.015 --> 02:56:14.003
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No.

02:56:14.003 --> 02:56:15.015
We&apos;ll put the motion to the vote.

02:56:15.015 --> 02:56:17.003
All those in favour.

02:56:17.003 --> 02:56:18.023
And the motion is carried unanimously.

02:56:18.023 --> 02:56:21.021
We now move on to 4.12,
Local Government Performance Reporting

02:56:21.021 --> 02:56:23.015
- 1 July-31 December 2022.

02:56:23.015 --> 02:56:26.023
This item presents the Local government
Performance Report to Council

02:56:26.023 --> 02:56:30.016
for the period of the 1st of July
to the 31st of December 2022.

02:56:30.016 --> 02:56:32.003
Do we have a mover of a motion?

02:56:34.016 --> 02:56:36.003
Councillor Barker.

02:56:36.003 --> 02:56:37.018
Is that as per the recommendation?

02:56:37.018 --> 02:56:39.005
Yes.

02:56:39.005 --> 02:56:41.000
And a seconder?

02:56:41.000 --> 02:56:42.023
Councillor Bodsworth.

02:56:42.023 --> 02:56:45.012
Councillor Barker, did you wish to speak
to the motion?

02:56:45.012 --> 02:56:47.001
CR PAUL BARKER: No, thanks, Mayor.

02:56:47.001 --> 02:56:50.007
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Bodsworth,
do you wish to speak to it?

02:56:50.007 --> 02:56:52.000
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: No, thanks, Mayor.

02:56:52.000 --> 02:56:54.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Would anybody like
to speak to the motion?

02:56:54.023 --> 02:56:56.010
Councillor Allen?

02:56:56.010 --> 02:56:59.013
CR GARY ALLEN: Look, many
of the service indicators are incomplete

02:56:59.013 --> 02:57:02.003
as they require a 12-month
period or that the surveys are

02:57:02.003 --> 02:57:05.006
to be conducted in January to March
and have not yet been completed.

02:57:08.001 --> 02:57:13.011
And I note with satisfaction that
there are fewer Council decisions made

02:57:13.011 --> 02:57:15.008
at closed meetings.

02:57:15.008 --> 02:57:18.020
This is resulting
in improved transparency due mainly

02:57:18.020 --> 02:57:22.017
to more tenders being awarded
in the open meeting,

02:57:22.017 --> 02:57:27.000
which I think has been a fantastic move.

02:57:27.000 --> 02:57:32.000
The timeframe to action food complaints
is very good, with most being completed

02:57:32.000 --> 02:57:36.009
within one day,
and perhaps we can give ourselves a bit

02:57:36.009 --> 02:57:39.024
of a pat on the back with the number
of Councillors attending Council meetings

02:57:39.024 --> 02:57:42.013
rising significantly since 2019.

02:57:42.013 --> 02:57:46.000
Thank you.

02:57:46.000 --> 02:57:47.012
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:57:47.012 --> 02:57:49.003
We&apos;ll now put the motion to the vote.

02:57:49.003 --> 02:57:51.013
All those in favour.

02:57:51.013 --> 02:57:54.007
And the motion is carried.

02:57:54.007 --> 02:57:55.019
I note that&apos;s 8.

02:57:58.011 --> 02:58:01.013
- Councillor Wellington,
Councillor Gazzard has just stepped out

02:58:01.013 --> 02:58:04.001
for a moment,
so that&apos;s why it&apos;s 8 that have been

02:58:04.001 --> 02:58:05.014
in favour.

02:58:05.014 --> 02:58:11.023
4.13, Award Contract Under 2022-23
Capital Works Program.

02:58:11.023 --> 02:58:15.019
This matter is being presented to Council
to seek higher powers of delegation

02:58:15.019 --> 02:58:20.000
for the CEO in relation
to one specific 2022-23

02:58:20.000 --> 02:58:23.016
Capital Works Project so that it can be
delivered prior to the winter months and

02:58:23.016 --> 02:58:25.004
to meet grant deadlines.

02:58:25.004 --> 02:58:27.011
Do we have a mover of a motion?

02:58:27.011 --> 02:58:28.023
Councillor Bodsworth

02:58:28.023 --> 02:58:30.011
- is it as per the recommendation.

02:58:30.011 --> 02:58:32.006
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Yes, thanks, Mayor.

02:58:32.006 --> 02:58:35.003
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And seconded
by Councillor Schonfelder.

02:58:35.003 --> 02:58:37.007
Did you wish to speak,
Councillor Bodsworth?

02:58:37.007 --> 02:58:40.003
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Briefly just
to say that this is an example

02:58:40.003 --> 02:58:43.009
of what Councillor Allen just mentioned,
where we&apos;re discussing more

02:58:43.009 --> 02:58:46.008
contract-related motions
in open Council meeting rather than

02:58:46.008 --> 02:58:49.017
in closed Council meeting, which I think
is a good thing.

02:58:49.017 --> 02:58:54.005
We&apos;re not able to discuss the budget
and other aspects of it,

02:58:54.005 --> 02:59:00.020
which are confidential,
but we can discuss the content

02:59:00.020 --> 02:59:06.010
of the report, and in this case,
we&apos;re looking at a restricted time window

02:59:06.010 --> 02:59:12.011
to get really important work done
before the winter season strikes,

02:59:12.011 --> 02:59:19.013
which requires that the CEO be able
to sign on to a contract without it having

02:59:19.013 --> 02:59:21.016
to come back to Council.

02:59:21.016 --> 02:59:24.023
So I think it&apos;s a sensible recommendation
given the time constraints.

02:59:24.023 --> 02:59:26.010
You also have a grant

02:59:26.010 --> 02:59:30.008
- we have some external funding deadlines
to meet in relation to this work,

02:59:30.008 --> 02:59:33.013
so there are a couple
of good reasons why it needs

02:59:33.013 --> 02:59:38.010
to be expedited and we don&apos;t want it
to have to come back to a council meeting.

02:59:38.010 --> 02:59:41.010
So I fully support the recommendation.

02:59:41.010 --> 02:59:42.022
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

02:59:42.022 --> 02:59:45.009
Councillor Schonfelder, did you wish
to speak to it?

02:59:45.009 --> 02:59:46.021
No.

02:59:46.021 --> 02:59:48.020
Would any other Councillors wish to speak?

02:59:48.020 --> 02:59:50.007
Councillor Wellington.

02:59:50.007 --> 02:59:53.017
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: (Inaudible) this
is a very important project.

02:59:53.017 --> 03:00:03.012
(Inaudible) suffered substantial damage
in (inaudible) that we had.

03:00:03.012 --> 03:00:09.017
I think this is an important project
to help address this (inaudible) get

03:00:09.017 --> 03:00:11.017
the report back to the CEO.

03:00:11.017 --> 03:00:13.005
There&apos;s no problem with it.

03:00:13.005 --> 03:00:14.017
Thank you.

03:00:14.017 --> 03:00:18.005
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Barker,
did you identify you wanted to speak

03:00:18.005 --> 03:00:19.018
as well?

03:00:19.018 --> 03:00:21.009
CR PAUL BARKER: Yes, thanks, Mayor.

03:00:21.009 --> 03:00:24.000
This recommendation is based
on time constraints bound

03:00:24.000 --> 03:00:25.012
to external grant funding.

03:00:25.012 --> 03:00:29.006
If it wasn&apos;t the key consideration would
be whether impact to works I might be keen

03:00:29.006 --> 03:00:31.024
to support it, but it&apos;s related
to external grant funding,

03:00:31.024 --> 03:00:34.017
so what we&apos;re voting on here
is rushing a piece of road works

03:00:34.017 --> 03:00:38.013
because we want to get our hands
on taxpayer funds from outside our shire.

03:00:38.013 --> 03:00:42.006
The reason this delegation of power
for spending exceeds the CEO&apos;s

03:00:42.006 --> 03:00:46.000
financial allocation of $600,000
is that a number of projects,

03:00:46.000 --> 03:00:50.005
most of which I don&apos;t think are critical,
have all been lumped together.

03:00:50.005 --> 03:00:53.003
Now, what happens when multiple projects
are lumped together?

03:00:53.003 --> 03:00:56.016
They create tenders that smaller
contractors simply cannot apply for.

03:00:56.016 --> 03:00:59.009
That leaves only larger companies
in a position to tender,

03:00:59.009 --> 03:01:02.018
meaning less competition,
resulting in a less competitive

03:01:02.018 --> 03:01:05.001
tender process, meaning we all pay more.

03:01:09.004 --> 03:01:14.010
Yeah, I&apos;d rather see a focus going
into specifically fixing Horseshoe Bend

03:01:14.010 --> 03:01:25.005
Road at the Thompsons Creek rectification
zone, but that was only built in

03:01:25.005 --> 03:01:29.016
- well, reconstructed in 2019, I think.

03:01:29.016 --> 03:01:31.011
Is that about

03:01:34.000 --> 03:01:37.000
- MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Mr Pike, did you want
to mention something.

03:01:37.000 --> 03:01:39.015
CHRIS PIKE: Through the Mayor,
just if I can offer a point

03:01:39.015 --> 03:01:42.004
of clarification to help Councillors
in their debate.

03:01:42.004 --> 03:01:45.001
Obviously Horseshoe Bend Road
is a significantly long road

03:01:45.001 --> 03:01:52.000
and the section that this contract would
relate to is here in urban Torquay close

03:01:52.000 --> 03:01:57.023
to the primary school,
the Torquay Coast Primary School, so south

03:01:57.023 --> 03:02:02.003
of South Beach Road roundabout.

03:02:02.003 --> 03:02:06.015
There&apos;s separate work being undertaken
around rectifying the damage

03:02:06.015 --> 03:02:12.023
at the actual bend in Horseshoe Bend Road
where the flood damage occurred.

03:02:12.023 --> 03:02:15.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thanks
for clarification.

03:02:15.004 --> 03:02:17.019
Did you have any further comments,
Councillor Barker?

03:02:17.019 --> 03:02:20.018
CR PAUL BARKER: Yeah, thanks
for that clarification, Mr Pike,

03:02:20.018 --> 03:02:24.006
but I see there&apos;s all these bits
and pieces going on on

03:02:24.006 --> 03:02:28.003
like the wombat crossing and all the rest
and we&apos;re getting taxpayer funds for that.

03:02:31.013 --> 03:02:33.019
I think we need to focus
on what&apos;s most important

03:02:33.019 --> 03:02:40.001
and that&apos;s the Thompson Creek damage,
but getting into

03:02:40.001 --> 03:02:44.000
all these other little bits and pieces,
I don&apos;t think it&apos;s essential.

03:02:44.000 --> 03:02:48.004
So again, you do you, I&apos;ll do me.

03:02:48.004 --> 03:02:51.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Bodsworth,
did you have any closing statements?

03:02:51.023 --> 03:02:53.017
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: No, thanks, Mayor.

03:02:53.017 --> 03:02:56.003
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: We&apos;ll put the motion
to the vote.

03:02:56.003 --> 03:02:57.015
All those in favour.

03:02:57.015 --> 03:02:59.003
And opposed.

03:02:59.003 --> 03:03:01.010
And the motion is carried, 8-1.

03:03:01.010 --> 03:03:05.010
We now move on to item 4.14,
Project Budget Adjustments

03:03:05.010 --> 03:03:06.023
and Cash Reserve Transfers

03:03:06.023 --> 03:03:08.010
- March 2023.

03:03:08.010 --> 03:03:11.010
This report is presented
for Council ratification and approval

03:03:11.010 --> 03:03:14.010
of proposed budget adjustments
and cash reserve transfers

03:03:14.010 --> 03:03:17.012
relating to the 2022-23 financial year.

03:03:17.012 --> 03:03:18.024
Do we have a mover?

03:03:18.024 --> 03:03:20.012
Councillor Allen

03:03:20.012 --> 03:03:21.024
- as per the recommendation?

03:03:21.024 --> 03:03:23.022
CR GARY ALLEN: As per the recommendation.

03:03:23.022 --> 03:03:26.008
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And do I have
a seconder, please?

03:03:26.008 --> 03:03:27.021
Councillor Bodsworth.

03:03:27.021 --> 03:03:29.016
Councillor Allen, do you wish to speak?

03:03:29.016 --> 03:03:31.008
CR GARY ALLEN: Yes, thank you, Mayor.

03:03:31.008 --> 03:03:37.002
I just wanted to focus on the item that
is reporting the transfer of $1,260,000

03:03:37.002 --> 03:03:40.015
from the Deans Marsh Community Hall
redevelopment

03:03:40.015 --> 03:03:43.018
to the Winchelsea Pool redevelopment.

03:03:43.018 --> 03:03:47.015
I along with Councillors Hodge
and Stapleton was

03:03:47.015 --> 03:03:52.024
at the Deans Marsh Festival on Sunday
and I and they heard mixed views

03:03:52.024 --> 03:03:54.014
about this recommendation.

03:03:56.017 --> 03:04:01.013
One consequence was referred in the
public question time by Tony Watts

03:04:01.013 --> 03:04:06.021
- namely, the ongoing maintenance issues
at the hall.

03:04:06.021 --> 03:04:11.021
Others were despondent that the project
has been placed on hold.

03:04:11.021 --> 03:04:15.013
People have been working very hard
over the past two years

03:04:15.013 --> 03:04:17.003
to reimagine the facility.

03:04:19.013 --> 03:04:23.010
Due to the issues faced
with the redevelopment of the hall

03:04:23.010 --> 03:04:25.024
and the comprehensive nature
of our consultation

03:04:25.024 --> 03:04:30.005
with the Deans Marsh community,
this project is not ready

03:04:30.005 --> 03:04:37.019
to progress in the 2023-24 financial year
and given the complexities identified,

03:04:37.019 --> 03:04:43.011
we will need grant funding as identified
by the CEO earlier this evening.

03:04:43.011 --> 03:04:46.023
And as stated in the report, this project
will be rescheduled

03:04:46.023 --> 03:04:53.012
for asset renewal in the 2026-27 budget,
thus giving time

03:04:53.012 --> 03:04:57.010
to source the necessary grant funding
if the project proceeds.

03:05:00.006 --> 03:05:05.019
It is therefore appropriate to allocate,
or reallocate, this asset renewal funding,

03:05:05.019 --> 03:05:11.008
which we know is an important element
of our future budgetary deliberations and

03:05:11.008 --> 03:05:15.010
is limited
to the Winchelsea Pool redevelopment

03:05:15.010 --> 03:05:20.003
project which has seen cost overrun.

03:05:20.003 --> 03:05:24.023
This is an asset that
will also be accessed by the Deans Marsh

03:05:24.023 --> 03:05:27.016
and District communities
and therefore I think it

03:05:27.016 --> 03:05:33.018
is a worthy project for that money
to be redirected too

03:05:33.018 --> 03:05:37.021
as the Deans Marsh Hall project isn&apos;t
ready to go out.

03:05:39.024 --> 03:05:43.011
Although it&apos;s painful in the Deans Marsh
community and I sympathise

03:05:43.011 --> 03:05:46.014
with the various views expressed
in that community,

03:05:49.008 --> 03:05:51.020
but it&apos;s just the reality, I&apos;m afraid.

03:05:51.020 --> 03:05:53.008
Thank you.

03:05:53.008 --> 03:05:54.020
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

03:05:54.020 --> 03:05:56.008
Councillor Bodsworth?

03:05:56.008 --> 03:05:59.001
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Just to agree
with Councillor Allen and

03:05:59.001 --> 03:06:02.003
to say I appreciate the report,
the transparency that it provides,

03:06:02.003 --> 03:06:05.015
and I think it&apos;s fairly self-explanatory.

03:06:05.015 --> 03:06:08.009
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Do any
other Councillors wish to speak?

03:06:08.009 --> 03:06:09.021
SPEAKER: Just very briefly.

03:06:09.021 --> 03:06:12.013
I&apos;d just like
to add that there have been prior examples

03:06:12.013 --> 03:06:15.009
of where money has been relocated.

03:06:15.009 --> 03:06:21.009
One such example was the Lions Park
in Moriac, where the soil was being tested

03:06:21.009 --> 03:06:28.012
for contamination and that money went
to Torquay for a Scouting project.

03:06:28.012 --> 03:06:32.023
So it has happened previously
and I sympathise

03:06:32.023 --> 03:06:38.001
with the Deans Marsh community
and I understand the sentiments expressed

03:06:38.001 --> 03:06:40.003
by Councillor Allen.

03:06:40.003 --> 03:06:41.015
Thank you.

03:06:41.015 --> 03:06:43.003
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

03:06:43.003 --> 03:06:44.016
Counsellor Barker?

03:06:44.016 --> 03:06:47.005
CR PAUL BARKER: I&apos;d like
to thank Victorian taxpayers.

03:06:47.005 --> 03:06:52.016
Without your contribution of $90,000,
we would not have been able to $74,595.

03:06:52.016 --> 03:06:55.014
It&apos;s only about 2 cents
for every Victorian taxpayer to chip in,

03:06:55.014 --> 03:06:57.002
so it&apos;s no biggy, right?

03:06:57.002 --> 03:06:59.014
But how many
of these small contributions are we

03:06:59.014 --> 03:07:03.017
all making to projects that have little
to no relevance to the funding source?

03:07:03.017 --> 03:07:06.014
It&apos;s disappointing
to see the Deans Marsh Hall redevelopment

03:07:06.014 --> 03:07:10.017
get bumped to the 26/27 financial year,
as noted by other Councillors,

03:07:10.017 --> 03:07:13.007
so we can focus on Winchelsea Pool budget.

03:07:13.007 --> 03:07:15.014
I&apos;m sure there will be many sad
to hear this.

03:07:17.016 --> 03:07:19.004
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

03:07:19.004 --> 03:07:21.005
Councillor Wellington?

03:07:21.005 --> 03:07:22.019
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: Thank you.

03:07:22.019 --> 03:07:26.005
I really very much empathise
with the Deans Marsh people.

03:07:26.005 --> 03:07:30.001
$1.2 million is a huge allocation
for a small community like that and then

03:07:30.001 --> 03:07:35.007
to have to sort
of forgo the Winchelsea Pool renewal

03:07:35.007 --> 03:07:39.005
is really a very important project,
obviously, to the Winchelsea community,

03:07:39.005 --> 03:07:42.023
but if I&apos;m still around
in whenever it was, 2026/27,

03:07:42.023 --> 03:07:46.002
when I think the project is due to come
up again,

03:07:46.002 --> 03:07:49.017
I&apos;ll certainly support Deans Marsh
with their hall.

03:07:49.017 --> 03:07:51.004
I do think that

03:07:51.004 --> 03:07:55.017
- I&apos;m concerned about the hall,
I&apos;m concerned about its condition,

03:07:55.017 --> 03:07:59.021
and I think Tony Watts&apos; question was
a very good question.

03:07:59.021 --> 03:08:03.014
We are the custodians of that hall
and it does have a heritage overlay

03:08:03.014 --> 03:08:07.008
and we should not
and cannot just allow demolition

03:08:07.008 --> 03:08:09.019
by neglect.

03:08:09.019 --> 03:08:13.024
So I&apos;ll be watching this current budget,
forthcoming budget process,

03:08:13.024 --> 03:08:15.013
to see what we&apos;re doing.

03:08:15.013 --> 03:08:23.001
If that hall is just left
with water undermining it, then it

03:08:23.001 --> 03:08:26.009
will just continue to deteriorate
and there will be no prospect

03:08:26.009 --> 03:08:31.009
of retaining the heritage that some people
think is a really important element of it.

03:08:31.009 --> 03:08:35.018
And the fact that it&apos;s listed
in our planning scheme as a property

03:08:35.018 --> 03:08:38.018
with heritage significance,
we should be taking that seriously

03:08:38.018 --> 03:08:40.019
and supporting it.

03:08:40.019 --> 03:08:44.022
So I thank Councillor Allen
and the Deans Marsh community

03:08:44.022 --> 03:08:47.018
for their tolerance of the situation
regarding the pool

03:08:47.018 --> 03:08:56.006
and throwing that money (inaudible)
Winchelsea, but I also will be looking

03:08:56.006 --> 03:09:01.010
to make sure that the Deans Marsh Hall
is probably maintained.

03:09:07.007 --> 03:09:08.019
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

03:09:08.019 --> 03:09:11.019
I think you&apos;ve stopped speaking there,
Councillor Wellington.

03:09:11.019 --> 03:09:14.015
I think we heard everything that
you were saying, but you seem

03:09:14.015 --> 03:09:16.002
to have frozen a little.

03:09:16.002 --> 03:09:17.015
I&apos;ll take that, thank you.

03:09:17.015 --> 03:09:20.001
Councillor Allen,
did you have any closing remarks?

03:09:20.001 --> 03:09:22.011
CR GARY ALLEN: Just
to thank Councillor Wellington

03:09:22.011 --> 03:09:24.023
for her sentiments expressed.

03:09:24.023 --> 03:09:30.007
But obviously there is division
within the Deans Marsh community

03:09:30.007 --> 03:09:33.011
and we can&apos;t gloss over that.

03:09:33.011 --> 03:09:38.024
The community is a little bit divided
about whether we retain or

03:09:38.024 --> 03:09:44.003
whether the hall is replaced and this
is one of the reasons I think why

03:09:44.003 --> 03:09:47.007
the project was delayed.

03:09:47.007 --> 03:09:52.016
But we must be diligent and continue
to work with the community

03:09:52.016 --> 03:09:55.006
to reach resolution.

03:09:55.006 --> 03:09:57.012
The drainage was one
of the reasons why there had

03:09:57.012 --> 03:10:01.015
to be massive maintenance
and a massive amount of money spent

03:10:01.015 --> 03:10:04.024
to redevelop the hall, which opens
up a whole series

03:10:04.024 --> 03:10:08.021
of questions which we can&apos;t explore this
evening.

03:10:08.021 --> 03:10:12.023
But I thank Councillor Wellington
for her concern and it&apos;s something that we

03:10:12.023 --> 03:10:15.008
will all be monitoring.

03:10:15.008 --> 03:10:16.021
Thank you.

03:10:16.021 --> 03:10:18.008
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Thank you.

03:10:18.008 --> 03:10:19.021
We now put the motion to the vote.

03:10:19.021 --> 03:10:22.013
All those in favour.

03:10:22.013 --> 03:10:25.021
All those opposed.

03:10:25.021 --> 03:10:27.013
Councillor Barker, did you vote?

03:10:27.013 --> 03:10:29.001
CR PAUL BARKER: Yes.

03:10:29.001 --> 03:10:30.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Opposed or for?

03:10:30.016 --> 03:10:32.004
CR PAUL BARKER: For.

03:10:32.004 --> 03:10:33.016
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: For.

03:10:33.016 --> 03:10:36.011
Okay, the motion is carried unanimously,
and that&apos;s eight.

03:10:36.011 --> 03:10:40.024
So we now move on to 4.16,
s6 Instrument of Delegation

03:10:40.024 --> 03:10:43.009
- Council to Members of Council Staff.

03:10:43.009 --> 03:10:47.007
The purpose of this report is
to present the s6 Instrument of Delegation

03:10:47.007 --> 03:10:50.013
from Council to members
of Council staff which has been reviewed

03:10:50.013 --> 03:10:52.007
and updated following changes.

03:10:52.007 --> 03:10:53.020
Have I skipped one?

03:10:55.021 --> 03:10:57.009
Sorry.

03:10:57.009 --> 03:10:58.023
In my eagerness, I skipped over it.

03:10:58.023 --> 03:11:00.023
Apologies for that.

03:11:00.023 --> 03:11:04.009
Moving on to 4.15, Instrument
of Appointment and Authorisation.

03:11:04.009 --> 03:11:05.024
I&apos;m glad no-one has fallen asleep.

03:11:05.024 --> 03:11:09.002
Actually, it was just a test
to make sure you&apos;re all awake.

03:11:09.002 --> 03:11:11.011
Planning &amp; Environment Act 1987.

03:11:11.011 --> 03:11:14.009
So the purpose of this report is
to seek Council&apos;s endorsement

03:11:14.009 --> 03:11:17.023
for authorised officers
under the Planning &amp; Environment Act 1987

03:11:17.023 --> 03:11:21.009
through the updated Instrument
of Authorisation and Appointment.

03:11:21.009 --> 03:11:24.018
This instrument requires updating due
to recent staff appointments.

03:11:24.018 --> 03:11:26.005
Do we have a mover of a motion?

03:11:26.005 --> 03:11:27.018
Councillor Barker

03:11:27.018 --> 03:11:29.005
- as per the recommendation?

03:11:29.005 --> 03:11:30.021
Seconded by Councillor Bodsworth.

03:11:30.021 --> 03:11:32.011
Did you wish to speak, Councillor?

03:11:32.011 --> 03:11:33.023
No?

03:11:33.023 --> 03:11:35.011
And Councillor Bodsworth?

03:11:35.011 --> 03:11:36.023
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: No, thanks.

03:11:36.023 --> 03:11:38.011
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No.

03:11:38.011 --> 03:11:40.006
Do any other Councillors wish to speak?

03:11:40.006 --> 03:11:41.018
No.

03:11:41.018 --> 03:11:43.006
We put the motion to a vote.

03:11:43.006 --> 03:11:44.018
All those in favour.

03:11:44.018 --> 03:11:46.013
And the motion is carried unanimously.

03:11:46.013 --> 03:11:48.001
We now move on to

03:11:48.001 --> 03:11:50.001
- and that&apos;s eight, Councillor Wellington.

03:11:50.001 --> 03:11:52.007
Councillor Gazzard is still
out of the meeting.

03:11:52.007 --> 03:11:54.017
We now move on to 4.16,
s6 Instrument of Delegation

03:11:54.017 --> 03:11:56.013
- Council to Members of Council Staff.

03:11:56.013 --> 03:11:59.023
The purpose of this report is
to present the s6 Instrument of Delegation

03:11:59.023 --> 03:12:03.011
from Council to members
of Council staff which has been reviewed

03:12:03.011 --> 03:12:06.008
and updated following changes
to relevant legislation.

03:12:06.008 --> 03:12:07.021
Do I have a mover of a motion?

03:12:07.021 --> 03:12:09.008
Councillor Schonfelder

03:12:09.008 --> 03:12:10.021
- as per the motion?

03:12:10.021 --> 03:12:12.008
Seconded Councillor Barker.

03:12:12.008 --> 03:12:14.011
Councillor Schonfelder do you wish
to speak?

03:12:14.011 --> 03:12:16.005
CR ADRIAN SCHONFELDER: No, thank you.

03:12:16.005 --> 03:12:17.017
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: No.

03:12:17.017 --> 03:12:19.005
Councillor Barker?

03:12:19.005 --> 03:12:20.019
CR PAUL BARKER: No, thanks, Mayor.

03:12:20.019 --> 03:12:22.024
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Anyone else wish
to speak?

03:12:22.024 --> 03:12:24.011
No.

03:12:24.011 --> 03:12:25.024
We put the motion to a vote.

03:12:25.024 --> 03:12:27.011
All those in favour.

03:12:27.011 --> 03:12:28.024
Motion is carried unanimously.

03:12:28.024 --> 03:12:31.009
Once again, that&apos;s eight,
Councillor Wellington.

03:12:31.009 --> 03:12:33.005
Kate Gazzard is still out of the meeting.

03:12:33.005 --> 03:12:35.017
CR HEATHER WELLINGTON: I did have my hand
up to speak.

03:12:35.017 --> 03:12:37.015
I just wanted
to say that these are really

03:12:37.015 --> 03:12:39.002
important documents.

03:12:39.002 --> 03:12:42.011
We&apos;re relying on officers to tell us
if there&apos;s any substantial change or

03:12:42.011 --> 03:12:45.017
anything we should be aware of
because they&apos;re so (inaudible) that&apos;s

03:12:45.017 --> 03:12:47.011
all I wanted to say and I did vote for it.

03:12:47.011 --> 03:12:48.023
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Great.

03:12:48.023 --> 03:12:50.011
Thank you.

03:12:50.011 --> 03:12:51.023
Sorry about that.

03:12:51.023 --> 03:12:54.001
With the delay with your internet,
it was hard

03:12:54.001 --> 03:12:56.023
to see that you were wanting to speak,
so apologies on that one.

03:12:56.023 --> 03:12:59.010
We now move on to 4.17, Conflict
of Interest Records.

03:12:59.010 --> 03:13:02.003
This item presents Conflict
of Interest Records received

03:13:02.003 --> 03:13:03.021
since the previous Council meeting.

03:13:03.021 --> 03:13:05.017
Do we have a mover of a motion?

03:13:05.017 --> 03:13:07.004
Councillor Bodsworth

03:13:07.004 --> 03:13:08.017
- as per the motion?

03:13:08.017 --> 03:13:10.011
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: Yes, thanks, Mayor.

03:13:10.011 --> 03:13:12.002
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: And a seconder?

03:13:12.002 --> 03:13:13.015
Councillor Stapleton.

03:13:13.015 --> 03:13:15.021
Would you like to speak,
Councillor Bodsworth?

03:13:15.021 --> 03:13:17.008
CR MIKE BODSWORTH: No, thanks.

03:13:17.008 --> 03:13:19.009
MAYOR LIZ PATTISON: Councillor Stapleton?

03:13:19.009 --> 03:13:20.021
No.

03:13:20.021 --> 03:13:22.021
Would anybody like to speak
to this motion?

03:13:22.021 --> 03:13:24.009
No.

03:13:24.009 --> 03:13:25.021
We&apos;ll put the motion to the vote.

03:13:25.021 --> 03:13:27.009
All those in favour.

03:13:27.009 --> 03:13:29.004
And the motion is carried unanimously.

03:13:29.004 --> 03:13:31.005
Once again, that&apos;s eight voted
on that one.

03:13:31.005 --> 03:13:32.017
Now, that was

03:13:32.017 --> 03:13:34.005
- we whizzed through a few there.

03:13:34.005 --> 03:13:37.013
So there is no urgent business
and we now actually have a closed section.

03:13:37.013 --> 03:13:40.001
So we have one confidential item
to consider tonight.

03:13:40.001 --> 03:13:42.017
We will now say good night
to everybody watching from home

03:13:42.017 --> 03:13:44.005
and thank you for joining us.

03:13:44.005 --> 03:13:46.012
Thank you
for our loyal listeners in the gallery.

03:13:46.012 --> 03:13:48.004
We much appreciate your attendance.

03:13:48.004 --> 03:13:49.017
Thank you so much.

03:13:49.017 --> 03:13:53.003
And we now will need you to leave, though,
so we can move into confidential.

03:13:53.003 --> 03:13:56.001
Can I have a Councillor to move a motion
to go into confidential?

03:13:56.001 --> 03:13:57.014
Yes, that&apos;s right.

03:13:57.014 --> 03:13:59.001
Councillor Hodge.

03:13:59.001 --> 03:14:00.014
Councillor Allen.

03:14:00.014 --> 03:14:02.001
Thank you.

03:14:02.001 --> 03:14:03.014
All those in favour.

03:14:03.014 --> 03:14:05.009
And the motion is carried unanimously.

03:14:05.009 --> 03:14:06.021
And that&apos;s eight.

03:14:06.021 --> 03:14:09.007
Can Governance please turn
off the live streaming.

03:14:09.007 --> 03:14:11.016
Thank you, everyone,
for your attendance tonight.

